$556 MILLION OF RATED DEBT AFFECTED
New York, March 14, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Renown Health's (NV) A3 long-term
and underlying ratings on $556 million of outstanding revenue bonds.
Conduit issuers of the bonds include the City of Reno and Washoe County.
The outlook has been revised to stable from negative.
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE: The A3 long-term rating reflects
Renown Health's position as Reno's leading provider of healthcare
services. Renown Health is an integrated delivery system,
offers tertiary and quaternary services, and enjoys a sizable regional
footprint. The revision of the outlook to stable from negative
reflects Renown's continued improvement in operating performance
and the further strengthening of the organization's balance sheet.
Renown's significant debt burden makes Renown particularly susceptible
to operating pressures, as the organization has historically relied
on above average operating cashflow margins in order to achieve acceptable
debt service coverage levels for the A3 rating category. The expectation
is that Renown will continue to improve performance measures and achieve
coverage levels more consistant with the past. A return to poorer
performance could result in a downgrade.
STRENGTHS
*Improved operating performance, with operating cashflow margin
reaching 10% in fiscal year (FY) 2011 (ended June 30) compared
to 9% in FY 2010, and operating margin measuring 1.5%
versus 0.1%; year to date (per unaudited financial
statements) through six months of FY 2012, performance remains strong,
with operating cashflow margin measuring 10.7%, and
operating margin measuring 2.1%; (FY 2010 results do
not reflect new accounting guidance adopted in FY 2011; FY 2012 results
exclude a $5.7 million one-time premium deficiency
reserve)
*Improved cash position, with cash on hand improving to 188
days as of fiscal year end (FYE) 2011 (June 30) versus 166 days at FYE
2010; year to date (per unaudited financial statements) cash remains
strong measuring 182 days as of December 31, 2011
*Sizable integrated delivery system with leading market share of 66%;
significant regional presence with nine imaging centers, a number
of owned physician practices, a second hospital in southern Reno,
and a joint venture interest in a community hospital in Gardnerville,
Nevada; Renown operates a healthplan (which represents approximately
25% of operating revenues) and employs 189 physicians
*Modest current capital needs
*Exclusive provider of certain services, including the region's
only pediatric intensive care unit and Level II trauma center, leading
to a high Medicare case mix index of 1.85 in FY 2011
*Proactive, seasoned management, which has been responsible
for Renown's aggressive response to the region's significant
economic pressures
CHALLENGES
*Persistance of economic challenges in the region; despite some
improvement, Nevada continues to post the highest unemployment rate
in the country; In January, Moody's downgraded the City
of Reno's seniormost tax backed rating to Aa3 from Aa2, and
affirmed the city's negative outlook
*Ongoing operating pressures with exposure to Medicaid increasing
to 21.5% of gross revenues in FY 2011 compared with 18.7%
in FY 2010 and 14.1% in FY 2008; charity care and bad
debt expense combined has increased in each of the last five years;
a $2.5 million reduction in county payments is expected
in FY 2012
*High leverage; despite the improved operating performance,
Renown's debt measures are weak for the rating category with an
unfavorable ratio of debt-to-cash flow of 6.6 times
in FY 2011, and Moody's-adjusted maximum annual debt
service (MADS) coverage of 3.4 times; cash to debt remains
weak for the rating category (though improved) at 77%
*Competitive operating environment with competition from two hospitals,
and a historically competitive payer market
OUTLOOK
The revision of the outlook to stable from negative reflects Renown's
continued improvement in operating performance and the further strengthening
of the organization's balance sheet. Renown's significant
debt burden makes Renown particularly susceptible to operating pressures,
as the organization has historically relied on above average operating
cashflow margins in order to achieve acceptable debt service coverage
levels for the A3 rating category. The expectation is that Renown
will continue to improve performance measures to achieve coverage levels
more consistant with the past. A return to poorer performance could
result in a downgrade.
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP
Significant improvement of debt measures; significant growth of market
share and improvement of the competitive environment
WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN
Failure to improve operating performance to historical levels; a
material increase in debt without commensurate increase in cash flow or
liquidity; material loss of market share;
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY USED
The principal methodology used in this rating was Not-For-Profit
Hospitals and Health Systems, published in January 2008.
Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for
a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Although this credit rating has been issued in a non-EU country
which has not been recognized as endorsable at this date, this credit
rating is deemed "EU qualified by extension" and may still
be used by financial institutions for regulatory purposes until 30 April
2012. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the
Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available
on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors
Service's information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Analytics' information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity,
obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has
issued the rating.
Bradley E. Spielman
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's FIS Domestic Sales Office - San Francisco CA
One Sansome St. Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94104
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Deepa Patel
Analyst
Public Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
MOODY'S AFFIRMS RENOWN HEALTH'S (NV) A3 REVENUE BOND RATING; OUTLOOK REVISED TO STABLE FROM NEGATIVE