APPROXIMATELY $1.1 BILLION IN DEBT AFFECTED
New York, March 26, 2012 --
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the City of San Jose's
general obligation bond ratings to Aa1 from Aaa. The city's
various lease revenue bond ratings have been downgraded to Aa3 from Aa2.
The outlook for the ratings is stable.
RATING RATIONALE
The rating reflects the multi-year erosion of the city's
general fund reserves. This decline is indicative of the difficulty
the city has faced to manage costs versus weakened revenues resulting
from the economic downturn and a very slow and tenuous recovery.
The rating and outlook incorporate our expectation that the city's
fiscal position will remain stable albeit at a lower level than in recent
years. The city's management is also being significantly
challenged to manage retirement costs and faces arduous barriers to reduce
the impact of those obligations.
The general fund bonds are secured by the city's unlimited property
tax pledge. The various leases are backed by a pledge to budget
and appropriate lease payments in exchange for numerous leased assets.
The two notch rating distinction between the current lease ratings and
the city's general obligation rating represents Moody's standard notching
for essential purpose, fixed asset leases relative to a California
issuer's general obligation rating. Broadly speaking the two notches
reflect the risk of abatement (and the related lack of seismic insurance
coverage) and the narrower, general fund security pledge for leases
compared to the unlimited property tax pledge securing general obligation
bonds.
STRENGTHS
-Exceptionally large Silicon Valley economy with solid resident
wealth levels for a large city
-Aggressive pursuit of opportunities to effectively manage retirement
costs
-Satisfactory fiscal position for the rating level
CHALLENGES
-Four consecutive years of audited deficits
-Increasing retirement cost burden
-Difficult barriers to reducing retirement costs
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP
-Significant and sustained improvement to the city's fiscal
position
-Implementation of a strategy to address long-term retirement
cost impacts
-Strengthening of the local economy
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN
-Additional diminution of the city's fiscal position
-Inability to effectively manage retirement costs
The principal methodology used in this rating was General Obligation Bonds
Issued by U.S. Local Governments published in October 2009.
Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for
a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Although this credit rating has been issued in a non-EU country
which has not been recognized as endorsable at this date, this credit
rating is deemed "EU qualified by extension" and may still
be used by financial institutions for regulatory purposes until 30 April
2012. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the
Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available
on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential
and proprietary Moody's Investors Services information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity,
obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and
for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist
between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of
entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to
the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A
member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member
of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process
page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time
before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not
be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that
it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information
that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page
on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Michael Wertz
Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's FIS Domestic Sales Office - San Francisco CA
One Sansome St. Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94104
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Eric Hoffmann
Senior Vice President
Public Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
MOODY'S DOWNGRADES SAN JOSE G.O. AND LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO Aa1 and Aa3 RESPECTIVELY; OUTLOOK REMAINS STABLE