THE CORPORATION HAS $300.9 MILLION RATED DEBT OUSTANDING
New York, September 21, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the City of Baltimore (MD) Hotel
Corporation's Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds, Senor Series
2006A to Ba1 from Baa3 and Subordinate Series 2006B to Ba2 from Ba1.
The senior lien bonds are outstanding in the amount of $247.5
million and the subordinate lien bonds are outstanding in the amount of
$53.4 million.
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
The downgrade is based on lower than expected revenues as senior lien
debt service requirements increase from $12.7 million to
$14.4 million and subordinate lien debt service increases
from $3.1 million to $3.5 million in FY 2012
due to the beginning of principal repayment on the bonds. The Ba1
reflects the hotel's solid financial performance during the economic downturn
and recovery of revenue over the past two years. Hotel performance
in occupancy and average daily rate approximated Moody's financial stress
scenarios when these bonds were initially rated; however, revenues
continue to fall short of expected levels. The hotel is generally
outperforming its competitive set in the Baltimore market and maintains
solid reserve levels that have not been used during this period of stress.
These reserves include site specific hotel occupancy taxes (HOT) collected
at the property and the ability to use up to $7 million of HOT
collected city-wide that must be appropriated from the city's budget,
if needed. In addition, 50% of the debt service reserve
fund is supported by $8.5 million surety policy provided
by Syncora Guarantee (rated Ca, developing outlook), which
Moody's believes now provides a substantially lower level of credit protection.
LEGAL SECURITY: The bonds will be secured by loan payments from
the corporation equal to debt service, which will in turn be secured
by the net revenues of the hotel and a first lien mortgage on the facility,
both of which will be pledged directly to bondholders. In addition,
the city has covenanted to budget and appropriate annually for the purposes
of paying debt service an amount equal to the hotel occupancy taxes generated
by the hotel, the property taxes paid by the hotel to the city,
and up to $7 million of city-wide hotel occupancy taxes(equal
to 25% of maximum annual debt service on the Series 2006A and 2006B
bonds combined). The bonds are additionally secured by various
reserve funds.
INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES: None.
STRENGTHS
* High level of ongoing municipal support. Tax revenue contributions
could total up to 86% or more of senior lien debt service in the
stabilized year
*Substantial reserves provide good protection from revenue shortfalls
*Well positioned in a historically strong hospitality market
*Hilton brings substantial expertise, resources, and brand-name
recognition to the project, along with providing a substantial financial
guarantee
CHALLENGES
*The project operates in a highly competitive market, with five
other high quality hotels located nearby, along with a number of
limited service hotels and several new properties expected to be constructed
in the coming years
*Initial revenue performance has been well below expected levels due
to the economic recession and lower demand for hotel space
*Reserves have weakened due to reduced credit strength of the surety
policy providers for 50% of the senior lien debt service reserve
fund and the lack of funding of the cash trap reserve
*The hotel is dependent in large part on the convention center's ability
to compete successfully with convention centers in other cities along
the Eastern seaboard, an increasingly crowded field.
Outlook
The negative rating outlook is based on Moody's expectation that economic
conditions will make it difficult for the hotel to generate revenues that
cover all expenses and debt service requirements. The outlook also
considers the current level of reserves, which are lower than initially
expected and are likely to decline in the coming years as they are used
to cover shortfalls in operating performance.
What Could Change the Rating - UP
RevPAR increases to levels contemplated in the initial financing and full
funding of the cash trap reserve could place upward pressure on the rating.
What Could Change the Rating - DOWN
If hotel financial performance continues at levels that do not allow annual
revenues to cover debt service requirements and expenses and if any additional
reserves or HOT collections are needed to meet all operating and debt
service requirements.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Generic Project Finance
Methodology published in December 2010. Please see the Credit Policy
page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors
Service's information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Analytics'
information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity,
obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor
and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information
received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process
page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time
before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not
be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that
it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information
that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page
on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Kurt Krummenacker
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Esra Akyol
Associate Analyst
Public Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
MOODY'S DOWNGRADES THE BALTIMORE HOTEL CORPORATION'S BONDS; OUTLOOK REMAINS NEGATIVE