New York, March 13, 2012 -- The following release represents Moody's Investors Service's summary
credit opinion on Alpha Natural Resources and includes certain regulatory
disclosures regarding its ratings. This release does not constitute
any change in Moody's ratings or rating rationale for Alpha. Moody's
current ratings for Alpha Natural Resources are:
Long Term Corporate Family Ratings domestic currency rating of Ba2
Probability of Default rating of Ba2
Senior Unsecured (domestic currency) domestic currency rating of Ba3,
68 - LGD4
Senior Unsec. Shelf (domestic currency) domestic currency rating
of (P)Ba3
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating rating of SGL-1
RATINGS RATIONALE
Alpha's Ba2 corporate family rating reflects its position as one of the
top three U.S. coal companies in terms of production and
reserves, its operating diversity with approximately 150 coal mines
and a presence in Appalachia and the Powder River Basin (PRB), its
ability to export coal though several East Coast and Gulf terminals,
blending opportunities and synergies that arise from the Massey merger,
and its 5 billion tons of reserves. The rating also reflects its
very strong liquidity position, including $586 million of
cash and cash equivalents, and availability of $1.1
billion under the revolver and AR securitization facilities.
Challenges for the Ba2 CFR include high business concentration in Central
Appalachia, where the industry is facing a secular decline and challenging
market conditions, including difficult geology, increasing
costs, heightened MSHA scrutiny of mine safety, ongoing coal-to-gas
substitution, and expected coal plant retirements due to aging fleet
and tightening environmental standards. The ratings are also constrained
by inherent volatility of met coal prices and current weakness in the
seaborne met coal market, as well as the inherent geological and
operating risks associated with mining.
Rating Outlook
The negative outlook reflects weakening operating performance due to the
headwinds facing the US coal industry, and in particular the Central
Appalachian region, including increasing costs due to difficult
geology and regulatory pressures; weak international demand for metallurgical
coal due to the ongoing financial crisis in Europe, slowing growth
in steel production rates in China and additional supplies coming online
globally; and weak domestic demand for steam coal due to ongoing
coal to gas substitution, warm weather and environmental regulations
that disadvantage coal.
What Could Change the Rating - Up
An upgrade is unlikely over the next 12-18 months but the outlook
could be stabilized if operating performance improves and Debt/EBITDA
is considered sustainable below 3.0x, free cash flow to debt
is above 5%, and EBIT/ Interest is sustainable above 1.5x.
What Could Change the Rating - Down
Factors that could lead to a downgrade include a deterioration of prices,
further cost increases, and permitting, regulatory,
or litigation matters that impact output and costs. An increase
in leverage above 3x EBITDA on a sustained basis, persistent free
cash flow to debt below 5%, sustained EBIT to interest below
1.5x, or an erosion of liquidity would be signs pointing
to a possible downgrade.
The principal methodology used in rating Alpha Natural Resources,
Inc. was the Global Mining Industry Methodology published in May
2009. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade
Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada
and EMEA published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page
on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Although this credit rating has been issued in a non-EU country
which has not been recognized as endorsable at this date, this credit
rating is deemed "EU qualified by extension" and may still
be used by financial institutions for regulatory purposes until 30 April
2012. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the
Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available
on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following :
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%)
and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may
exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names
of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported
to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%.
A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a
member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has
issued the rating.
Anna Zubets-Anderson
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Brian Oak
MD - Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's Disclosures on Credit Ratings of Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.