London, 02 August 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service today changed its rating outlook for ArcelorMittal
to negative from stable. Moody's affirmed ArcelorMittal's
Baa3 senior unsecured rating, its P-3 Commercial Paper rating,
and the Baa3 rating for debt issued by ArcelorMittal, ArcelorMittal
Finance and ArcelorMittal USA. The change in outlook reflects Moody's
more negative appraisal of worldwide steel market conditions over the
next six months, in combination with ArcelorMittal's relatively
weak credit metrics.
"With the company's near-term operating performance more
likely to decline than improve, progress toward strengthening leverage
and cash flow ratios depends on debt reduction, which relies on
asset sales or credit-protection measures. The company is
taking steps to reduce debt and improve operating performance, however,
the challenging economic and steel industry environment may undermine
the full force of these credit-reinforcing actions," says
Steve Oman, Senior VP-lead analyst for the steel industry
in EMEA at Moody's.
Stabilizing the outlook will require both a sizable reduction of debt
and an improvement in operating performance. If steel market conditions
continue to be similar to or, as we expect, slightly worse
than the first half of 2012, we will maintain a negative outlook
-- as opposed to lowering the company's ratings -- as
long as the company is on track to reduce gross debt by a significant
amount, of the magnitude of $5 billion, over the next
six months. In the event the company's operating performance
appears to be moving materially below recent levels (for example,
less than $7.5 billion of adjusted EBITDA compared to $8.5
billion for the LTM ended 30 June), then further debt reduction
would be necessary to maintain the Baa3 rating. Key credit metrics
supportive of our Baa3 rating are gross debt/EBITDA leverage below 3.5x
(currently 3.9x) and a ratio of retained cash flow (RCF) to gross
debt of at least 16% (currently 14%).
RATINGS RATIONALE
ArcelorMittal's performance has turned down, as have our expectations
for the second half of 2012. We expect the second half of the year
to be adversely impacted by the sluggish global economy, lower steel
prices, and cooling in China. We are estimating the company
will have adjusted EBITDA of approximately $7.8 billion
in 2012, with modest improvement expected in 2013. Based
on 30 June 2012 adjusted gross debt of $32.8 billion,
debt/EBITDA would be around 4.2x at the end of 2012, well
above the 3.5x debt/LTM EBITDA target we have said is necessary
for maintaining the Baa3 senior unsecured rating.
Moody's expects debt will be reduced in the second half of 2012.
ArcelorMittal has been active in selling non-core investments and,
in 2012, has closed on or announced disposals representing $1.5
billion in cash proceeds, with the majority of the proceeds used
to repay debt. We expect further divestitures in the second half
of the year but whether or not they'll be sufficient in size to
get debt/EBITDA to 3.5x is not clear. Challenging industry
conditions could affect buyers' appetites, financing capacity
and valuations. And, if ArcelorMittal's cash from operations
declines from the first half's $2.75 billion it will
not fully cover anticipated second half capex ($2.15 billion)
and dividends ($600 million), thereby consuming a portion
of the cash raised via asset sales.
The $5 billion of debt reduction noted above is not an absolute
debt reduction target but indicates the rough magnitude of debt reduction
needed to get leverage to a level Moody's normally associates with
a cyclical company operating in the down part of the business cycle.
Other factors that will influence the rating in the near term include
trends and outlook within the steel industry, the company's
response to the operating environment in terms of asset sales and credit-protection
measures, cash flow generation and liquidity.
ArcelorMittal's liquidity is strong and puts them in a good position
to weather a downturn. The company has access to approximately
$10 billion of credit facilities and had $4.5 billion
of cash at 30 June. This compares to $5 billion of debt
maturities over the next 18 months. Change in working capital is
more likely to be a source than a use of cash over the next two quarters
and free cash flow is likely to be close to breakeven if not positive.
Factors that support ArcelorMittal's Baa3 rating are its size,
geographic and product diversification, growing iron ore operations,
which support its own operations as well as provide an additional source
of revenue, and strong liquidity. Additionally, company
management is committed to retaining its investment grade rating.
The principal methodology used in rating ArcelorMittal, ArcelorMittal
Finance and ArcelorMittal USA was the Global Steel Industry Methodology
published in January 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on
www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
ArcelorMittal is the world's largest steel company. It operates
approximately 65 integrated and minimill steel-making facilities
in over 20 countries, which have a production capacity of around
125 million tonnes of crude steel per year. The company also has
sizable captive supplies of iron ore and coal and a trading and distribution
network. Over the last 12 months, the company shipped 83
million tonnes of steel and had sales of $93 billion.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entities or their designated
agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare each of the ratings are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entities, obligations or credits satisfactory for the purposes of
issuing these ratings.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning the ratings is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible
Service(s) to the rated entities or their related third parties within
the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the
special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided
to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the
ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for
further information.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%)
and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may
exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names
of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported
to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%.
A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a
member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
In addition to the information provided below please find on the ratings
tab of the issuer page at www.moodys.com, for each
of the ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the lead rating
analyst and the Moody's legal entity that has issued each of the
ratings.
Steven P Oman
Senior Vice President
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Olivier Beroud
Managing Director
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Moody's changes ArcelorMittal's rating outlook to negative from stable (Baa3 senior unsecured)