Approximately $12 billion of rated debt affected
New York, May 09, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service changed the rating outlook for Chesapeake
Energy Corporation (Chesapeake) to negative from stable. Moody's
also changed to negative from stable the rating outlooks for Chesapeake
Midstream Partners, L.P. (CHKM) and Chesapeake Oilfield
Operating, L.L.C. (COO). Chesapeake's,
CHKM's and COO's Ba2 Corporate Family Ratings (CFR) and Ba3
senior unsecured ratings were affirmed. Chesapeake's Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating remains SGL-3. These rating actions
follow Chesapeake's reported first quarter results that point to
an even larger capital spending funding gap for 2012 caused primarily
by lower natural gas prices but also by increased spending.
RATINGS RATIONALE
"The negative outlook reflects the escalating execution risk of
Chesapeake's plan for funding its large capital spending budget,
rising leverage metrics and accompanying liquidity concerns,"
commented Pete Speer, Moody's Vice President. "The
company's already diminished cash flows are vulnerable to further
declines in natural gas prices and it remains dependent on completing
asset sales and other financing transactions with third parties to maintain
adequate liquidity and fund its transition towards higher liquids production."
The recent disclosures related to the chief executive officer's
personal financing transactions to fund his participation in the Founder
Well Participation Program have raised conflict of interest questions
and reflect poorly on Chesapeake's corporate governance.
These issues further confirm our existing views regarding the CEO's
dominant role at Chesapeake and his strong influence on the company's
risk appetite and growth objectives. This influence is reflected
in the company's aggressive financial policies and complicated structure
which are incorporated into our ratings. However, if the
resulting SEC inquiry, shareholder litigation or the audit committee's
review of the CEO's personal financing transactions raises additional
issues or adversely effects the company's execution of its funding
strategy then there could be negative ratings implications.
Chesapeake's latest guidance is for capital spending to exceed operating
cash flow in 2012 by around $10.5 billion, up from
$8 billion in its February guidance. This funding gap could
continue to rise if natural gas prices decline further, lowering
the company's earnings and increasing its compliance risk with its
bank credit facility debt covenants in the second half of 2012.
Year to date Chesapeake has raised nearly $4 billion through a
bond offering and planned monetization transactions. We view volumetric
production payments (VPP) and the recent subsidiary preferred stock transactions
as debt and therefore the company's debt (reflecting Moody's
adjustments) has increased to approximately $23.6 billion
at March 31, 2012 from $19.2 billion at the beginning
of the year. Consequently, Debt/proved developed (PD) reserves
and Debt/average daily production have increased to around $12.30/boe
and $35,700/boe, respectively, at March 31,
2012.
"We are also concerned that the company's leverage metrics
could remain elevated or continue to increase," said Speer.
In order for Chesapeake to reverse this rise in leverage metrics and maintain
adequate compliance headroom with its credit facility covenants it must
execute its plan to meet most of its remaining funding needs through asset
sales, reduce its reported debt and continue to grow its production
volumes. If the company has to instead rely more heavily on debt
funding then its leverage metrics could remain at levels inconsistent
with its current ratings.
The affirmation of Chesapeake's Ba2 CFR is supported by its very
large proved reserve and production scale, big acreage positions
in multiple basins across the US, low operating costs and successful
execution through the drillbit. The company is among the largest
independent exploration and production companies rated by Moody's,
with reserve and production scale comparable much higher rated investment
grade E&Ps. Chesapeake has acreage positions in many oil and
wet gas plays that are very attractive to both peers and financial investors
and a strong track record of completing its planned monetization transactions.
Liquidity issues or further increases in leverage metrics could result
in Chesapeake's ratings being downgraded. Debt/average daily production
and Debt/PD reserves sustained above $35,000/boe and $12/boe
and RCF/Debt below 20% could result in a ratings downgrade.
The outlook could return to stable if the company completes its planned
asset sales, reduces its leverage metrics and improves its liquidity.
In order for the ratings to be upgraded Chesapeake's leverage metrics
have to decline significantly and its liquidity will have to substantially
improve and be less reliant on monetization transactions. Debt/average
daily production, Debt/PD, and Retained Cash Flow (RCF)/Debt
approaching $25,000/boe, $9/boe and 35%
on a sustainable basis could result in a ratings upgrade to Ba1.
The outlooks for CHKM and COO were changed to negative because of their
dependence on Chesapeake for a substantial majority of their revenues
and Chesapeake's ownership interest in those entities. CHKM
is a master limited partnership that primarily provides natural gas gathering
services. Chesapeake owns 50% of CHKM's general partner
and a sizable amount of its limited partner interests. COO is a
wholly owned oilfield services subsidiary of Chesapeake.
The principal methodology used in rating Chesapeake was the Global Independent
Exploration and Production Industry Methodology published in December
2011. The principal methodologies used in rating CHKM and COO were
the Global Midstream Energy Industry Methodology published in December
2010 and the Global Oilfield Services Industry Methodology published in
December 2009, respectively. Other methodologies used include
Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies
in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for
a copy of these methodologies.
Moody's current ratings for Chesapeake Energy and its affiliates are:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Long Term Corporate Family Ratings (domestic currency) of Ba2
Probability of Default Rating of Ba2
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating of SGL-3
Senior Unsecured (domestic currency) Rating of Ba3
Senior Unsecured (foreign currency) Rating of Ba3
Senior Unsecured Shelf (domestic currency) Rating of (P)Ba3
LGD Senior Unsecured (domestic currency) Assessment of 71 - LGD5
LGD Senior Unsecured (foreign currency) Assessment of 71 - LGD5
Chesapeake Energy Corporation is an independent exploration and production
company based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued
by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's
Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf,
London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following :
parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential
and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%)
and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may
exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names
of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported
to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%.
A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a
member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has
issued the rating.
Peter Speer
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Steven Wood
MD - Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's changes Chesapeake Energy outlook to negative