Negative outlook assigned to all ratings
New York, November 28, 2012 --
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the City of Detroit's (MI) General
Obligation Unlimited Tax (GOULT) and Certificates of Participation (COPs)
ratings to Caa1 from B3, and has also downgraded the city's General
Obligation Limited Tax (GOLT) rating to Caa2 from Caa1. These downgrades
reflect the city's ongoing precariously narrow cash position and
a weakened state oversight framework following the repeal of Public Act
4 (PA 4). The city's GO, COPs and GOLT ratings have
been removed from review for possible downgrade and the outlook has been
revised to negative. The negative outlook on the GO, COPS
and GOLT ratings is based on the rising possibility that the city could
file for bankruptcy or default on an obligation over the next 12 to 24
months, the general uncertainty of state oversight as challenges
to Public Act 72 (PA 72) persist following the repeal of PA 4, and
the city's ongoing inability to implement reforms necessary to regain
financial stability.
Concurrently, Moody's has downgraded the ratings for the Detroit
Water and Sewage Enterprise Revenue debt one notch to Baa3 (Senior Lien)
and Ba1 (Second Lien) as the rising risk of a city bankruptcy filing brings
ongoing uncertainty regarding the treatment of these securities in the
event of a filing. Ratings for the Detroit Water and Sewage Enterprise
Revenue Bonds have been removed from review for possible downgrade and
the outlook has been revised to negative. The negative outlook
for the water and sewer debt is based on the increasing possibility that
the city could file for bankruptcy over the next 12 to 24 months.
Strengths
-Focused and dedicated executive management team supported by a
strong working relationship with the Governor's office
-State oversight provided by Michigan Public Act 72 and FSA
-Escrowed bond proceeds available following successful completion
of the MFA financing deal
Challenges
- Weak liquidity profile, requiring active cash flow management
techniques, including debt refinancing, to meet operating
needs
-Ongoing state oversight of the city's finances which may result
in appointment of an emergency financial manager, which is the first
step to filing for bankruptcy
-Challenges to timely implementation of restructuring provisions
outlined in the Financial Stability Agreement; ongoing political
instability
-Potential termination payment due for swap agreements issued in
conjunction with Certificates of Participation
Outlooks
The negative outlook on the GO, COPS and GOLT ratings is based on
the increasing possibility that the city could file for bankruptcy or
default on an obligation over the next 12 to 24 months, the general
uncertainty of state oversight as challenges to PA 72 persist following
the repeal of PA 4, and the city's ongoing inability to implement
reforms necessary to regain financial stability. The negative outlook
for the water and sewer debt is based on the rising possibility that the
city could file for bankruptcy on an obligation over the next 12 to 24
months.
What Could Change the GO, GOLT and COPs Ratings -- UP (or removal
of the negative outlook)
- Material operating surpluses, achieved through structurally
balanced financial results that will carry forward to future fiscal years
- A material improvement in the city's unrestricted cash and investment
position such that the city continues to be less dependent on cash flow
borrowing
-Improved liquidity and cash management such that the city's ability
to ensure timely debt service payments are not in question
-Removal of uncertainty surrounding state oversight legislative
authority
What Could Change the GO, GOLT and COPs Ratings -- DOWN
- Revenue challenges that continue to exceed expenditure (and alternate
revenue) solutions
- Continued operating deficits leading to heightened cash-flow
weakness
- Further increase of the city's debt leverage
- Increase in likelihood of either a bankruptcy filing or plan
to default on debt obligations
-Elimination of legislative authority for state oversight/assistance
What Could Change the Water Rating -- UP (or removal of the negative
outlook)
-Statutory or other legal action to definitively remove the system's
assets from the estate of the city
- Stabilization or reversal of the city's trajectory towards bankruptcy
- Removal of statutory authority for the city to file for bankruptcy
What Could Change the Water Rating -- DOWN
-Bankruptcy filing, or increasing likelihood of a filing,
by the City of Detroit
-Weak operating performance resulting in decreased debt service
coverage levels
-Further increased debt ratio
-Weakening of the service area through economic forces or wholesale
contract changes
What Could Change the Sewage Rating -- UP (or removal of the negative
outlook)
-Statutory or other legal action to definitively remove the system's
assets from the estate of the city
-Stabilization or reversal of the city's trajectory towards bankruptcy
- Removal of statutory authority for the city to file for bankruptcy
What Could Change the Sewage Rating - DOWN
-Bankruptcy filing, or increasing likelihood of a filing,
by the City of Detroit
-Weak operating performance resulting in decreased debt service
coverage levels
-Further increased debt ratio
-Weakening of the service area through economic forces or wholesale
contract changes
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGIES USED
The principal methodology used in this rating was General Obligation Bonds
Issued by U.S. Local Governments published in October 2009.
Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for
a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued
by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's
Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf,
London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
and public information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and
for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist
between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of
entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to
the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A
member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member
of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process
page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time
before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not
be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that
it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information
that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page
on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Genevieve Nolan
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
100 N Riverside Plaza
Suite 2220
Chicago, IL 60606
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Henrietta Chang
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Public Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's downgrades Detroit's GOULT bonds and COPs to Caa1 from B3 and GOLT bonds to Caa2 from Caa1; Water and Sewage Revenue Senior and Second Lien Bonds downgraded to Baa3 and Ba1