Approximately $4.2 billion of debt securities affected
New York, April 23, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has downgraded all of the debt ratings of Pitney
Bowes Inc. ("Pitney Bowes"), including the senior
unsecured rating to Baa1 from A2 and its short-term rating to Prime-2
from Prime-1. This concludes the review initiated on March
15, 2012. The rating outlook is stable.
RATINGS RATIONALE
"The revised ratings reflect our expectation that Pitney Bowes'
business and credit profile will be challenged over the intermediate term
due to the ongoing secular decline in traditional mail delivery,
as well as our expectation for worsening mail volume trends and increasing
competition from alternative web-based providers,"
said Moody's Vice President Gregory Fraser. Given the continued
erosion in core mailing and production mail volumes (i.e.,
postal meter and production mail equipment installed bases), we
also believe Pitney Bowes could target acquisitions to offset revenue
decline in the core business units and supplement its organic growth initiatives
in digital hybrid, cloud-based and software offerings.
Pitney Bowes' new initiatives are slowly gaining traction and will
initially have lower relative margins, which means they are not
yet profitable enough to offset the legacy business decline. Though
past acquisitions have been modest and funded with internal cash,
future acquisitions will likely be larger and debt-financed.
"At the Baa1 rating, Pitney Bowes has some flexibility to
continue the transition of its business model to restore growth via external
means, if necessary, while also contending with rising competitive
challenges," said Fraser.
As a result of these challenges, we expect Pitney Bowes' operating
margins will decline to the 14% to 15% range (from 15.4%
at December 2011) and debt to EBITDA will rise to the 3x to 3.5x
range (from 2.7x) on a Moody's adjusted basis. These metrics
are within the range for other Baa1-rated cross industry peers
(i.e., median operating margin of 18.5%
and debt to EBITDA of 3x).
..Ratings downgraded include:
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Senior Unsecured Rating to Baa1 from A2
Senior Unsecured Shelf Rating to (P)Baa1 from (P)A2
Subordinate Shelf Rating to (P)Baa2 from (P)A3
Preferred Shelf Rating to (P)Baa3 from (P)Baa1
Commercial Paper Rating to P-2 from P-1
Pitney Bowes International Holdings, Inc.
Preferred Stock Rating to Baa3 from Baa1
Despite our expectation for continued erosion of its key markets,
we believe Pitney Bowes will maintain leadership positions in its core
mailing and production mail businesses. We also expect the company
to benefit from cost reduction and restructuring efforts, and experience
some modest equipment revenue growth due to a mix shift to enterprise
products and increased backbone services for a downsized United States
Postal Service. Further, revenue and earnings are expected
to remain highly visible given that about 80% of revenue is derived
from recurring sources that provide some resiliency.
Pitney Bowes maintains good liquidity with the expectation of free cash
flow in the range of $150 to $200 million (down from an
average of about $400 million over the last 5 years), cash
balances of at least $300 million (cash and equivalents were $869
million as of December 2011), and full access to a $1.25
billion committed bank facility maturing May 2013 (likely to be extended).
During the fourth quarter of 2012, $550 of long term debt
is scheduled to mature, which we expect Pitney Bowes to repay through
a combination of refinancing and domestic cash.
The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that over the intermediate
term Pitney Bowes will generate good profitability and cash flow despite
the challenges of transforming its business model, growing its revenue
base and reversing the decline in profitability. The outlook also
reflects our expectations that Pitney Bowes will continue to invest in
its business and that acquisitions may increase in number and size.
Over time with continued pressure from the secular and competitive challenges,
ratings could be downgraded if: (i) Pitney Bowes' adjusted
operating margins fell near or below 13%; (ii) adjusted debt
to EBITDA was sustained above 3.5x; (iii) the company cannot
reverse the trend of revenue and profit declines; or (iv) Pitney
Bowes makes acquisitions that could signal the need to pursue growth through
meaningful external investment. Ratings could be raised if Pitney
Bowes: (i) demonstrates steady organic revenue growth; (ii)
sustains adjusted operating margins above 16%; and (iii) adheres
to its conservative financial practices which include maintaining good
liquidity and a moderately leveraged balance sheet such that adjusted
debt to EBITDA is expected to be sustained below 2.5x.
Moody's subscribers can find additional information in the Pitney Bowes
Credit Opinion published on www.moodys.com.
The principal methodology used in rating Pitney Bowes was the Global Technology
Hardware Rating Methodology published in October 2010. Please see
the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this
methodology.
With headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut, Pitney Bowes is
a leading global provider of integrated mail, messaging and document
management solutions that includes postage meters, mailing equipment
and related document messaging services and software, mail and marketing
services. Revenue was $5.3 billion in 2011.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued
by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's
Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf,
London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following :
parties involved in the ratings, public information, confidential
and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information, and
confidential and proprietary Moody's Analytics information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com
for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and
for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist
between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of
entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to
the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A
member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member
of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation;
however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process
page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time
before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not
be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that
it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information
that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page
on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Gregory A. Fraser
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Robert Jankowitz
Associate Managing Director
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's downgrades Pitney Bowes (sr. unsec. to Baa1, short-term to P-2); outlook stable