Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Enter the above code here:
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's upgrades ratings of $147.14 mm of TruPS CDO notes issued by MMCaps Funding XVII, Ltd.

Global Credit Research - 08 May 2013

Moody's also affirmed rating of $70.95 mm of notes.

New York, May 08, 2013 -- Moody's Investors Service announced today that it has upgraded the rating on the following notes issued by MMCaps Funding XVII, Ltd.

U.S. $162,000,000 Class A-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2035 (current outstanding balance of $ 94,644,676.61), Upgraded to Aa3 (sf); previously on March 20, 2012 Upgraded to A3 (sf);

U.S. $19,500,000 Class A-2 Floating Rate Notes Due 2035 (current outstanding balance of $19,500,000), Upgraded to A2 (sf); previously on March 20, 2012 Upgraded to Baa1 (sf);

U.S. $33,000,000 Class B Floating Rate Notes Due 2035 (current outstanding balance of $33,000,000), Upgraded to A3 (sf); previously on March 20, 2012 Upgraded to Baa3 (sf);

Moody's also affirmed the ratings on the following notes:

U.S.$35,475,000 Class C-1 Floating Rate Notes Due 2035 (current outstanding balance of $35,475,000), Affirmed to Ca (sf); previously on March 27, 2009 Downgraded to Ca (sf);

U.S.$35,475,000 Class C-2 Floating Rate Notes Due 2035 (current outstanding balance of $35,475,000), Affirmed to Ca (sf); previously on March 27, 2009 Downgraded to Ca (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes are primarily a result of the deleveraging of the senior notes and an increase in the transaction's overcollateralization ratios since the last rating action in March 2012.

Moody's notes that the Class A-1 notes have been paid down by approximately 27.2% or $35.36 million since the last rating action, due to diversion of excess interest proceeds and disbursement of principal proceeds from redemptions and sales of underlying assets. As a result of this deleveraging, the Class A-1 notes' par coverage improved to 213.43% from 174.47% since the last rating action, as calculated by Moody's. Based on the latest trustee note valuation report dated March 1, 2013, the Class A/B Principal Coverage Ratio and the Class C Principal Coverage Ratio are reported at 136.62% (limit 125.0%) and 93.61% (limit 102.10%), respectively, versus February 24, 2012 levels of 129.81% and 93.47%, respectively. Going forward, the senior notes will continue to benefit from the diversion of excess interest and the proceeds from future redemptions of any assets in the collateral pool.

Moody's also notes that the deal benefited from a slight improvement in the credit quality of the underlying portfolio. Based on Moody's calculation, the weighted average rating factor (WARF) improved to 1081 compared to 1166 as of the last rating action date. The Moody's cumulative assumed defaulted amount has declined to $42.6 million from $49.7 million as of the last rating action date.

Due to the impact of revised and updated key assumptions referenced in our rating methodology, key model inputs used by Moody's in its analysis, such as par, weighted average rating factor, Moody's Asset Correlation, and weighted average recovery rate, may be different from the trustee's reported numbers. In its base case, Moody's analyzed the underlying collateral pool to have a performing par balance of $202 million, defaulted/deferring par of $42.6 million, a weighted average default probability of 23.55% (implying a WARF of 1081), Moody's Asset Correlation of 23.03%, and a weighted average recovery rate upon default of 9.55%. In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly modeled, qualitative factors are part of rating committee considerations. Moody's considers the structural protections in the transaction, the risk of triggering an Event of Default, recent deal performance under current market conditions, the legal environment, and specific documentation features. All information available to rating committees, including macroeconomic forecasts, inputs from other Moody's analytical groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature and severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence the final rating decision.

MMCAPS Funding XVII, Ltd., issued in September 2005, is a collateralized debt obligation backed by a portfolio of bank and insurance trust preferred securities.

The portfolio of this CDO is mainly comprised of trust preferred securities (TruPS) issued by small to medium sized U.S. community banks and insurance companies that are generally not publicly rated by Moody's. To evaluate the credit quality of bank TruPS without public ratings, Moody's uses RiskCalc model, an econometric model developed by Moody's KMV, to derive their credit scores. Moody's evaluation of the credit risk for a majority of bank obligors in the pool relies on FDIC financial data received as of Q4-2012. For insurance TruPS without public ratings, Moody's relies on the insurance team and the underlying insurance firms' annual financial reporting to assess their credit quality. Moody's also evaluates the sensitivity of the rated transaction to the volatility of the credit estimates, as described in Moody's Rating Implementation Guidance "Updated Approach to the Usage of Credit Estimates in Rated Transactions" published in October 2009.

The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to Rating TRUP CDOs" published in May 2011. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The transaction's portfolio was modeled using CDOROM v.2.8.9 to develop the default distribution from which the Moody's Asset Correlation parameter was obtained. This parameter was then used as an input in a cash flow model using CDOEdge. CDOROM v.2.8.9 is available on moodys.com under Products and Solutions -- Analytical models, upon return of a signed free license agreement.

Moody's performed a number of sensitivity analyses of the results to certain key factors driving the ratings. We analyzed the sensitivity of the model results to changes in the portfolio WARF (representing an improvement or a deterioration in the credit quality of the collateral pool), assuming that all other factors are held equal. If the WARF is increased by 200 points from the base case of 1081, the model-implied rating of the Class A-1 notes is one notch worse than the base case result. Similarly, if the WARF is decreased by 141 points, the model-implied rating of the Class A-1 notes is one notch better than the base case result.

In addition, Moody's also performed one additional sensitivity analyses as described in the Special Comment "Sensitivity Analyses on Deferral Cures and Default Timing for Monitoring TruPS CDOs" published in August 2012. In the first, we gave par credit to banks that are deferring interest on their TruPS but satisfy specific credit criteria and thus have a strong likelihood of resuming interest payments. Under this sensitivity analysis, we gave par credit to $15.8 million of bank TruPS. In the second sensitivity analysis, we ran alternative default-timing profile scenarios to reflect the lower likelihood of a large spike in defaults. Below is a summary of the impact on all rated notes (shown in terms of the number of notches' difference versus the current model output, where a positive difference corresponds to lower expected loss), assuming that all other factors are held equal:

Sensitivity Analysis 1:

Class A-1: +1

Class A-2: +1

Class B: +1

Class C-1: 0

Class C-2: 0

Sensitivity Analysis 2:

Class A-1: 0

Class A-2: 0

Class B: 0

Class C-1: 0

Class C-2: 0

Moody's notes that this transaction is subject to a high level of macroeconomic uncertainty, as our outlook on the banking sector remains negative, although there have been some recent signs of stabilization. The pace of FDIC bank failures continues to decline in 2013 compared to 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, and some of the previously deferring banks have resumed interest payment on their trust preferred securities. Our outlook on the insurance sector is stable.

Further information on Moody's analysis of this transaction is available on www.moodys.com.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

Moody's did not receive or take into account a third-party assessment on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets or financial instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction in the past six months.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Rachid Ouzidane
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Rodrigo Araya
Senior Vice President/Manager
Structured Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Moody's upgrades ratings of $147.14 mm of TruPS CDO notes issued by MMCaps Funding XVII, Ltd.
No Related Data.

 

© 2013 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

 


CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

 


ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable, including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

 


MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

 


For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

© 2013 Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.
Regional Sites: