Moodys.com
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
New Issue:

MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa1 RATING TO UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND'S COMBINED $115 MILLION OF 2010 SERIES D AND E AUXILIARY FACILITY AND TUITION REVENUE BONDS AND AFFIRMS OUTSTANDING RATINGS; OUTLOOK IS STABLE

30 Nov 2010

SYSTEM WILL HAVE $1.1 BILLION OF RATED DEBT OUTSTANDING INCLUDING THE CURRENT OFFERING

Higher Education
MD

Moody's Rating

ISSUE

RATING

Auxiliary Facility and Tuition Revenue Bonds (Tax Exempt), 2010 Series D

Aa1

  Sale Amount

$34,195,000

  Expected Sale Date

12/08/10

  Rating Description

Public University Revenue Bonds

 

Auxiliary Facility and Tuition Revenue Bonds (Taxable Build America Bonds), 2010 Series E

Aa1

  Sale Amount

$80,805,000

  Expected Sale Date

12/08/10

  Rating Description

Public University Revenue Bonds

 

 
Moody's Outlook   Stable
 

Opinion

NEW YORK, Nov 30, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa1 rating to the University System of Maryland's combined $115 million of fixed-rate tax-exempt 2010 Series D Auxiliary Facility and Tuition Revenue Bonds and taxable 2010 Series E Auxiliary Facility and Tuition Revenue Bonds (Build America Bonds). Moody's has also affirmed the Aa1 on the System's outstanding rated debt (described below in Rated Debt section). The System will have $1.16 billion of debt outstanding including the current offering. The System's outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's Aa1 rating on the University System reflects its very strong student and research market positions as a multi-campus public university system serving a Aaa-rated state. The System generates consistently positive operating margins, has a large and growing financial resource base and conservative debt structure with limited amount of variable-rate debt and no interest rate swaps.

LEGAL SECURITY: The System's Auxiliary Facility and Tuition Revenue Bonds are payable from a broad pledge of tuition revenues and auxiliary facility fees, with total pledged revenues equating to $1.37 billion in FY 2010, compared to $116.4 million of pro-forma maximum annual debt service in FY 2012, including the Series 2010 D and E bonds. The Series 2003 Revolving Loan Program Bonds are unlimited obligations of the System payable from any legally available sources.

USE OF PROCEEDS: Various capital projects across multiple campuses as well as costs of issuance

DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES: The System has a modest amount of variable-rate debt outstanding (less than 6%) and has not engaged in the use of interest rate swaps as part of its debt program.

STRENGTHS

*Large and growing multi-campus public university system operating 11 degree granting institutions located throughout the State of Maryland, as well as a large base of on-line enrollment. In fall 2009, the System enrolled 111,079 full-time equivalent students, representing a 14% increase over fall 2005 enrollment. Management reports a 2.6% increase in headcount enrollment in fall 2010 over fall 2009.

*Positive operating margins and well diversified revenue base. During FY 2007-2009, the System generated a 2.8% three-year average operating margin by Moody's calculation with annual debt service coverage averaging 2.9 times during this timeframe. Per draft unaudited financial statements, the System achieved a 2.4% surplus in FY 2010. In addition to student charges, which represent approximately 37% of operating revenue, the System also relies heavily on state appropriations for 27% of operating revenue (State has Aaa G.O. rating), and grants and contracts (26%).

*Large research enterprise, with nearly $870 million of research expenditures in FY 2009 and over $900 million in FY 2010 based on draft financials. The System's grants and contract revenue is well diversified, with approximately 66% coming from federal sources (27% of total funding from Department of Health and Human Services), 16% state, and 18% private.

*Manageable future borrowing plans, with approximately $115 million of new debt anticipated annually, offset by the relatively rapid amortization of the System's outstanding debt. The System typically issues 20-year bonds with level debt service. The System has a relatively small proportion of its debt issued in a variable-rate mode (less than 6%) and does not have any interest rate swap agreements. This bond issuance represents an acceleration of FY 2011 borrowing in order to take advantage of attractive interest rates, and we do not anticipate additional new money borrowing by the System through the rest of FY 2011.

CHALLENGES

*Continuing budget pressures at the State with an uncertain longer-term impact on operating and capital support for the System, despite relatively healthy funding in recent years. Per the draft 2010 unaudited financial statements, state operating appropriations declined to $925.9 million, a 10.2% decline compared to FY 2009, after taking into consideration a $133 million cash transfer back to the state. The System continues to focus on operating expense containment and expects to implement furloughs again in FY 2011.

*Moderate pressure on financial resource growth as a result of planned cash funding of certain capital projects with accumulated reserves (up to $200 million estimated during FY 2010 and FY 2011) and past investment losses sustained by the foundations. Expendable financial resources of the System and its foundations totaled nearly $1.4 billion in FY 2009 ($1.5 billion based on draft unaudited financials for FY 2010) and covered debt 1.4 times in FY 2009 and draft FY 2010 expendable financial resources cover $1.16 billion of pro-forma debt 1.35 times. In Moody's opinion, a relatively high proportion of the System's endowment (including Foundation assets) is invested in alternative asset classes, which tend to be less liquid.

*Significant capital needs in order to absorb future enrollment growth projections and in order to adequately tackle ongoing repair and renovation of existing facilities. Potential pressure on state capital support would be a credit concern.

MARKET POSITION/COMPETITIVE STRATEGY: LARGE AND GROWING MULTI-CAMPUS PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM SERVING Aaa-RATED STATE; SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY

Moody's expects that the System will continue to demonstrate enrollment growth, with certain campuses designated as growth institutions and management projecting strong enrollment growth over the next decade. The System is finalizing a multi-year strategic plan through 2020, which includes a focus on improving access and affordability of higher education within the state, significant growth of the System's research activities, and ongoing transformation of educational delivery methods.

The System includes 11 degree-granting higher education institutions (of the 13 public institutions in Maryland). In fall 2009, the System enrolled a consolidated 111,079 full-time equivalent (FTE) students and management estimates a roughly 2.6% increase in headcount enrollment in fall 2010. More than half of the enrollment growth in fall 2010 was concentrated at University of Maryland University College which focuses on education of adult and part-time students. The System operates one of the largest on-line and distance learning higher education programs, with a significant number of locations overseas and over 19,000 (headcount) students enrolled at overseas sites. The System also continues to focus on opening regional centers in high traffic areas within Maryland offering degree programs.

Student demand remains healthy, with strong application volume. In fall 2009, 53% of freshmen applicants were accepted. However, the matriculation ratio of accepted students has declined, with 33% of accepted freshmen enrolling in fall 2009 (compared to 45% in fall 2003) reflecting a highly competitive market. The System draws a relatively large share of its students from outside of Maryland (24.6% of the entering freshmen class in fall 2009). The System is focused on increased higher education participation rates within the state and has a goal of growing the volume of transfer students from community colleges to the System, with articulation agreements with all Maryland community colleges in place.

The System is also a major research enterprise, with research activities conducted by various campuses as well as at its research center--University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. The System has also been a partner in establishing four affiliated research parks. In FY 2009, research expenses were nearly $870 million (over $905 million in FY 2010 based on draft unaudited financials). Moody's believes that the System's grants and contract revenue is well diversified, with approximately 66% coming from federal sources (27% of total funding from Department of Health and Human Services), 16% state, and 18% private.

The System has not directly owned or operated health care enterprises since 1984, when the System's major health care delivery systems were spun off into a separate corporation, the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS). Moody's rates the debt of UMMS A2, with a stable outlook. There are significant financial exchanges between the System and UMMS, per an annually renewable contract between the two entities, although most capital planning and construction is done independently. For more information on the University of Maryland Medical System, please see Moody's last rating report dated December 9, 2009.

OPERATING PERFORMANCE: HEALTHY OPERATING PERFORMANCE AND DIVERSIFIED REVENUE BASE; PRESSURE ON STATE FUNDING REQUIRES COST CONTAINMENT AND TUITION GROWTH

Moody's expects that the System will maintain its track record of positive operating performance, with the System generating a 2.8% average surplus during FY 2007-2009 and maintaining a continued focus on cost-containment measures and resumed tuition increases. The System's operating base is large, with close to $3.8 billion of operating revenue in FY 2009 on a Moody's-adjusted basis ($3.9 billion estimated for FY 2010). Revenues are well diversified among student charges (37%), state appropriations (27%), and grants and contracts (26%, excluding Pell grants). In light of pressure on State funding as described below, management is increasingly focused on expense containment and operating efficiency. FY 2011 will represent the third year that the System has mandated staff furloughs (up to 10 days) as a means of cost containment.

The System implemented fairly large tuition increases in the earlier part of this decade to offset declines in state funding, but froze tuition during the past four years in exchange for replacement dollars from the State. Despite flat tuition rates, net tuition per student has remained healthy at $8,966 in FY 2009, and overall net tuition revenue has grown nicely during this timeframe as a result of enrollment growth. The System has implemented tuition increases in fall 2010, with individual increases varying significantly by campus. Management projects that these tuition increases will generate approximately $39 million of additional revenue for the System in FY 2011. We expect that the System will need to continue to increase tuition in order to help offset state funding reductions.

Moody's maintains a Aaa general obligation rating with a stable outlook on the State of Maryland reflecting the State's strong economy and high personal income levels, offset by significant upcoming budget pressure and above average debt burden. For more information on the State's credit profile, please read our report published on November 8, 2010.

The State faces continuing budget pressures with an uncertain impact on operating and capital support for the System. The System did not receive any federal stimulus funding (ARRA) in FY 2010 to supplement state funding, and state appropriations per the draft unaudited financial statements for FY 2010 declined over 10% compared to FY 2009 after taking into consideration a $133 million cash transfer back to the state. For FY 2011, the System's state appropriation is $1.056 billion. Cash transfers back to the state have not been required to date. The System expects to receive quarterly appropriations from the State on time and has not been notified of any delays in cash flow funding from the State.

BALANCE SHEET POSITION: FUNDRAISING AND HEALTHY OPERATING PERFORMANCE OFFSET SPENDING OF RESERVES ON CAPITAL PROJECTS; SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF OFF-BALANCE SHEET PRIVATELY DEVELOPED PROJECTS AFFILIATED WITH THE SYSTEM

After dipping in FY 2009 due to investment losses, the System's total financial resource base resumed growth in FY 2010, with an estimated $2.05 billion of total financial resources in FY 2010 (based on draft unaudited FY 2010 financials including draft figures for the System's component units). Expendable financial resources in FY 2009 covered debt and operations 1.4 and 0.4 times, respectively. Based on draft unaudited financials, expendable financial resources in FY 2010 cover pro-forma debt 1.35 times and cover $3.8 billion of FY 2010 expenses 0.4 times.

The System's endowment and Foundation investments experienced a 24.6% investment loss during FY 2009, and management reports a positive 13.4% return in FY 2010. In Moody's opinion, a relatively high proportion of the System's endowment (including the foundations' assets) is invested in alternative asset classes, which tend to be less liquid. The investment portfolio managed by the foundations ($722.5 million as of September 30, 2010) includes an asset allocation of approximately: 23.5% public equities (including hedge funds that both long and short public equities), 14.4% private equity, 26.2% other hedge funds, 8% marketable real estate, 12.4% energy and natural resources, 8% real estate, and 8% fixed income and cash. Moody's concerns about the liquidity of the endowment and Foundation assets are mitigated by the System's maintenance of typically over $1 billion of cash balances (outside of the endowment) invested in funds held by and managed by the State Treasurer as mandated by statute. As of June 30, 2009, the System (excluding the Foundations) had $1.17 billion of unrestricted cash and investments with monthly liquidity. This monthly liquidity covered 121 days of cash expenses in FY 2009.

The System has planned to spend down some of its unrestricted reserves on capital projects, including a dormitory facility at the College Park campus and a campus utility building. Although these capital plans may moderately slow resource growth, they have been offset by continued healthy operating performance and strong fundraising. The System is in the midst of a $1.8 billion comprehensive fundraising campaign with a goal of completing the campaign by end of 2011. Management reports that the System had received $1.46 billion of gifts and pledges through FY 2010, with $890 million of cash received.

The System's pro-forma direct debt including the Series 2010 D and E bond issuance will increase to $1.16 billion. Management does not anticipate any additional new money borrowing through the end of FY 2011 and anticipates approximately $115 million of gross debt issuance annually in the near term. Moody's believes that the System's debt structure is conservative, with largely fixed rate debt, no interest rate swap agreements, and the majority of rated debt issued with a 20 year maturity. Over the past five years, the System has made over $350 million of principal payments on outstanding debt.

In addition to its direct debt liabilities, the System has over $414 million of privatized student housing at multiple campuses and privatized utility improvements at College Park. The holders of the privatized housing and utility system bonds do not have legal recourse to the assets and revenues of the System, but Moody's continues to monitor the performance of these projects and the System's level of involvement and support. Several of the privatized projects have generated below forecasted cash flows and debt service coverage and have been downgraded to below investment grade as a result. To date, the System has not provided notable direct or indirect financial support to the projects. In addition to these existing projects, the System is in the early stages of working with a private developer, who will develop a mixed-use project on the East Campus near College Park. The total project cost could exceed $500 million, and the project could include retail, a hotel, market-rate residential housing, and possibly graduate housing which would be leased directly to students. The project would be on System land leased to the developer per a ground lease. The project is in the early stages of development, and Moody's has not reviewed any legal documents to determine potential credit impact on the System. We will continue to monitor the evolution of this large scale project as it becomes more concrete and legal documents are available.

The actuarial accrued liability related to the System's other post-retirement benefits (OPEB) will be recognized at the State-level, and the System is obligated to pay annual premiums as a percentage of active employees' salaries to the State of Maryland to fund current costs as well pay a defined amount to fund future costs.

Outlook

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations of ongoing enrollment growth, positive operations and ability to absorb potential future cuts in state funding, and manageable plans for future borrowing.

What could change the rating--UP

Continued growth in reserve levels coupled with strengthened student demand and operating performance

What could change the rating--DOWN

Large increase in projected borrowing above that outlined by management; sustained cuts in state funding pressuring the System's operating performance

KEY INDICATORS (FY 2009 financial data and fall 2009 enrollment data; figures in parentheses are draft unaudited FY 2010 financial ratios)

Total Full Time Equivalent Enrollment: 111,079

Total Financial Resources: $1.9 billion ($2.05 billion)

Moody's Adjusted Total Operating Revenues: $3.8 billion ($3.9 billion)

Pro-Forma Direct Debt: $1.16 billion

Expendable Financial Resources to Direct Debt: 1.39 times (1.35 times)

Expendable Financial Resources to Operations: 0.4 times (0.4 times)

Operating Margin: 2.0% (2.4%)

Reliance on Student Charges: 37% (39%)

Reliance on Grants and Contracts (excluding Pell Grants): 26% (27%)

Reliance on State Operating Appropriations: 27% (24%)

State of Maryland General Obligation Rating: Aaa

Unrestricted Monthly Liquidity: $1.17 billion

Monthly Days Cash on Hand: 121 days

RATED DEBT

Series 1997, 1998, 1999 A&B, 2000, 2001 A&B, 2002, 2003A, 2006, 2007, 2008A, 2008B, 2009A, 2009B (Build America Bonds), 2009C, 2009D Bonds, 2010A and 2010B (Build America Bonds), 2010C, 2010D, 2010E (Build America Bonds): Aa1 rating

Series 2003B: Aa1 rating, insured by Assured Guaranty (Assured Guaranty's current financial strength rating is Aa3 with a negative outlook), 2004-2010 maturities are insured

Series 2004A&B: Aa1 rating, certain maturities insured by National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. (formerly MBIA), which has a financial strength rating of Baa1 with a developing outlook

Series 2005A: Aa1 rating, certain maturities insured by National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. (formerly MBIA), which has a financial strength rating of Baa1 with a developing outlook

Revolving Loan Program Bonds (2003A): Aa1 (Multiannual mode with a 3 year tender; next mandatory tender scheduled for 6/1/13)

CONTACTS

University System of Maryland: Jim Sansbury, 301-445-1939

Financial Advisor: Jeremy Bass, Public Financial Management, 617-330-6914

METHODOLOGY:

The principal methodology used in this rating was Public College and Universities published in November 2006.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, and public information.

Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available on the credit satisfactory for the purposes of assigning a credit rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Analysts

Kimberly S. Tuby
Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service

Karen Kedem
Backup Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service

Contacts

Journalists: (212) 553-0376
Research Clients: (212) 553-1653


Moody's Investors Service
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
USA

MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa1 RATING TO UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND'S COMBINED $115 MILLION OF 2010 SERIES D AND E AUXILIARY FACILITY AND TUITION REVENUE BONDS AND AFFIRMS OUTSTANDING RATINGS; OUTLOOK IS STABLE
No Related Data.
© 2020 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND/OR ITS CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S (COLLECTIVELY, "PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE SUCH  CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY'S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS ("ASSESSMENTS"), AND  OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND  PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND  PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES  ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR  PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and Moody's investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody's Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody's Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​​​​​
Moodys.com