Moodys.com
Close
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
New Issue:

MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa2 RATING AND NEGATIVE OUTLOOK TO MCCLEAN COUNTY, KY JUSTICE CENTER CORPORATION FIRST MORTGAGE REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS

08 Nov 2010

APPROXIMATELY $932 MILLION IN SIMILAR DEBT OUTSTANDING

Kentucky (Commonwealth of)
State
KY

Moody's Rating

ISSUE

RATING

First Mortgage Refunding Revenue Bonds (Courthouse Annex Project), Series 2010

Aa2

  Sale Amount

$2,605,000

  Expected Sale Date

11/08/10

  Rating Description

Lease Rental

 

Opinion

NEW YORK, Nov 8, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating with a negative outlook to McLean County , KY Justice Center Corporation First Mortgage Refunding Revenue Bonds (Courthouse Annex Project) Series 2010

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating is based on the credit quality of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (issuer rating of Aa1, with a negative outlook), the subject-to-appropriation nature of the payments supporting the bonds, and the commonwealth's significant reliance on appropriation-backed financings to fund capital investments. Proceeds of the Series 2010 bonds will be used to refund for debt service savings debt issued to finance the construction of a courthouse used by the commonwealth's Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC).

Kentucky retired the last of its outstanding general obligation bonds in 1995. Kentucky issues debt indirectly by entering into lease/financing agreements with various state agencies. The issuer rating represents the commonwealth's implicit general obligation rating and reflects a record of financial control, including close monitoring of revenues and proactive responses to lowered revenue estimates. This strength is offset by low per-capita income levels, above-average debt levels and low pension funded levels. In addition, Kentucky's economy remains dependent on a weakened manufacturing sector, although it has diversified in recent years.

Kentucky's negative outlook reflects a trend of reliance on non-recurring budget balancing measures, which, in addition to use of federal stimulus funds, include debt restructuring for near-term savings and authorized issuance of debt to cover teacher retiree health insurance costs. The state has resorted to these measures in the face of significant fiscal stress related to the economic downturn. The enacted budget for the fiscal 2011-2012 biennium relies on these measures, together with some expenditure cuts, other recurring measures, and projected revenue growth for balance. The ability of the commonwealth to meet expected expenditure reduction and revenue growth targets, without the need for additional reliance non-recurring measures, will be a key near-term credit consideration. Additionally, Kentucky's low retirement system funding levels are a concern. The commonwealth has enacted various legislative items that are expected to improve retirement system funding over time and also address retiree health costs, limiting the amount of biennial borrowing needed and avoiding the need for future borrowing. The success of these measures in improving funding levels and providing for retiree health costs will also factor into Moody's credit assessment.

Credit strengths are:

-Commonwealth's reliance on appropriation-backed debt

-History of active financial control

Credit challenges are:

-Revenue weakness amid a slowing economy, leading to significant fiscal stress and reliance on non-recurring measures

-Dependence on weakened manufacturing sector, particularly auto manufacturing

-Low per-capita income

-Above-average debt ratios

-Weak pension system funding

-Trend of borrowing to satisfy current costs for teacher retiree health benefits

-History of late budget adoption, although recent budgets have been timely

PAYMENTS FOR DEBT SERVICE PROVIDED UNDER BIENNIALLY RENEWABLE LEASE

The bonds are payable solely from lease rental payments from the commonwealth's Administrative Office of the Courts under a lease agreement with the corporation. Per the lease, AOC is obligated to make rental payments, including payment of a "Use Allowance" equal to debt service and an "Operating Costs Allowance" payment to cover operating costs. AOC is obligated to make semi-annual rental payments of the "Use Allowance" directly to the trustee two business days prior to the debt service payment due dates. The "Operating Costs Allowance" payment is made to the county. Rental payments are made pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement, which is automatically renewable for successive biennial periods unless terminated in writing by AOC.

AOC covenants in the lease to seek sufficient legislative appropriations to make rental payments for each biennial period. The General Assembly has no obligation to make appropriations for rental payments, and AOC has no obligation to renew the lease. The commonwealth is highly reliant on lease-appropriation financings for capital projects and has no history of non-appropriation for these financings. Under the Mortgage Deed of Trust, a mortgage lien on the project has been granted to the trustee. In addition, the interests of the corporation in the lease (excluding the Operating Costs Allowance) have been assigned to the trustee. In the event of a default on the bonds, the trustee may sell or re-let the facility to benefit bondholders.

The lease may be amended to reduce AOC's required rental payments. Any such amendment, however, would be contingent on the county's assumption of the reduced portion and confirmation by Moody's that the outstanding rating on the bonds would not be withdrawn or downgraded as a result of the amendment.

LEASE PERMITS ABATEMENT, RENTAL CREDITS

Should the project be destroyed or damaged such that it is rendered unusable by AOC, rental payments may be abated until AOC regains use of the project. As protection against such an event, rental interruption insurance sufficient to cover 24 months of debt service is required per the lease. In addition, the lease provides for an assessment of whether or not the project could be sufficiently renovated in 24 months. If the project cannot be sufficiently repaired within 24 months , insurance proceeds will be used to discharge the bonds. Per the lease, casualty insurance is provided at the greater of the amount of bonds outstanding or the full insurable value of the project.

Certain rental credits are permitted if AOC incurs operating costs in performing maintenance or other functions that are the obligation of the County under the lease. These credits, however, may only be taken against the Operating Costs Allowance, which AOC pays to the county for operating costs.

For additional information on the Commonwealth of Kentucky, please see Moody's October 18, 2010 report.

Outlook

Kentucky's credit outlook is negative. The commonwealth's economic and financial weakening has led to sizable budget deficits, which the commonwealth has dealt with largely through the use of one-time resources, including a draw-down of reserve balances and borrowing for budget relief. Kentucky faces ongoing budget pressure over the biennium as it seeks to stabilize its finances. The commonwealth has a history of active financial management that has enabled it to address fiscal instability. The commonwealth's ability to maintain fiscal stability by meeting planned expenditure, revenue, and debt targets over the next fiscal year without additional reliance on one-time resources is a key credit consideration. As the economic recovery takes hold, it will be important for the commonwealth to find alternatives to non-recurring budgetary solutions and to rebuild reserves.

What could change the rating - UP:

-Long-term economic and revenue growth, with structural balance in state finances and limited reliance on non-recurring resources

-Build-up and maintenance of reserves.

What could change the rating - DOWN:

-Continued economic slowing, even after a national upturn, resulting in weaker revenue performance that strains commonwealth finances

-Depletion of reserves with no replenishment in step with other comparably rated states

-Trend of ongoing reliance on non-recurring resources, particularly use of additional deficit financing, to balance the commonwealth's budget

-Lack of a fiscal plan that will maintain budget balance when federal fiscal stimulus funding is no longer available

-Trend of negative GAAP basis ending balances

-Indications of strained liquidity

-Failure to address declining pension system funded levels

-Failure of the commonwealth to pass a timely budget, leading to an extended shutdown of state government, even if debt service continues to be paid

The principal methodology used in this rating was The Fundamentals of Credit Analysis for Lease-Backed Municipal Obligations published in October 2004.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following: parties involved in the ratings, public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available on the credit satisfactory for the purposes of assigning a credit rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Analysts

Maria Coritsidis
Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service

Lisa Heller
Backup Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service

Edith Behr
Senior Credit Officer
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service

Contacts

Journalists: (212) 553-0376
Research Clients: (212) 553-1653


Moody's Investors Service
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
USA

MOODY'S ASSIGNS Aa2 RATING AND NEGATIVE OUTLOOK TO MCCLEAN COUNTY, KY JUSTICE CENTER CORPORATION FIRST MORTGAGE REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​​​
Moodys.com