Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
21 Jan 2000
MOODY'S CONFIRMS DEBT RATINGS OF SEALY MATTRESS CO.; OUTLOOK CHANGED TO POSITIVE
Moody's Investors Service confirmed the B3 ratings of Sealy Corporation's $125 million of 9.875% senior subordinated notes and $128 million (face amount) of 10.875% senior subordinated discount notes, both due 2007. Moody's also confirmed the Ba3 rating of its $550 million secured credit facility, which includes a $100 million revolving credit and $450 million (original amount) of term loans. The company's senior implied rating is B1 and the senior unsecured issuer rating is B2. The outlook has been changed to positive from stable.
The rating confirmations continue to reflect the company's continued market leadership of the US bedding industry, which is largely dominated by the top three producers, Sealy, Serta and Simmons; highly recognizable brand names, including Sealy, Sealy Posturepedic, and Stearns & Foster; improving operating results and profit margins during fiscal 1999; and the corresponding enhancement of its debt protection measures. However, despite the fact that Sealy's leverage has diminished since its 1997 recapitalization by Bain Capital, its debt burden remains high and its interest coverage moderate. The ratings also take into consideration the inherent risks of the mature and increasingly competitive bedding industry; and the possibility that Sealy will pursue debt-financed acquisitions or use its cash flow for expansionary purposes aimed at growing market share and improving its operating efficiencies. While margin competition does exist in the industry, to date, the major players have acted as responsible competitors.
The change in the rating outlook to positive from stable reflects Moody's expectation that Sealy's market position and cash flow will continue to strengthen and will more firmly support the company's heavy debt burden. Nevertheless, its total debt is not likely to decline substantially in the near term. To the extent that the cash Sealy generates in the future is not retained in the business, the rating outlook may be revised.
With total sales approaching $1 billion, Sealy Corporation has retained its status as the largest bedding manufacturer in North America, followed by Serta, Inc. (#2), and Simmons Company (#3). Buoyed by the strength of the US economy, the bedding industry remains fairly robust, despite its mature status. Unit growth was in the mid-to-high single digit range during 1999, slightly higher than the 1998 figure. Fiscal 2000 growth is expected to remain healthy despite a possible slowdown of the US economy. The bedding industry, which is roughly $3.9 billion in size, remains highly competitive with the top mattress manufacturers representing nearly 60% of the overall market, the balance accounted for by smaller producers. Looking ahead, the top manufacturers will likely continue to roll-up smaller ones, thereby driving market share gains. In any event, leverage ratios across the industry will likely remain fairly high.
Sealy's market share gained modestly in 1999, largely at the expense of the smaller regional manufacturers who are finding it increasing difficult to compete with the large national brands. Brand strength could become an increasingly important rating consideration as retailers continue to rationalize their suppliers and lower their inventory levels.
For the last twelve months ended August 29, 1999, the company's revenues and EBITDA increased to approximately $954 million and $136 million (14% margin), respectively, compared with approximately $891 million and $110 million (12% margin) at the end of fiscal 1998 (ended November 30th). During the first nine months of 1999, unit volume increased by slightly more than 5%, slightly higher than that of the industry, while average unit selling price improved by a little more than 4%, the latter attributable to an improved sales mix of higher margin products. During the year, the company introduced the highly successful Sealy Posturepedic Golden Anniversary Line (mid-price point) and the Crown Jewel DSS Line and focused on selling its premium priced Stearns & Foster brand. Historically, price increases have not play a material role in increasing the Sealy's sales or profitability. However, the fact that the company re-engineers its product line every 2-3 years generally allows for higher average unit selling prices.
Given a possible weakening of the US economy in fiscal 2000, Sealy could be challenged in its efforts to sell higher levels of premium-priced products. As a result, there could be some margin pressure.
Sealy's improved manufacturing process appears to be paying operational dividends as the company has been able to achieve modest plant efficiencies, a reduction in manufacturing overhead and reduced prices for raw materials. For the last twelve ended August 29, 1999, cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales decreased by approximately 110 basis points to 55% boosting gross margins by the equivalent amount to 45%. Much of this improvement reflects an increase in sales of higher end units. Despite higher marketing expenses associated with increased sales volume and additional cooperative advertising and promotions, operating margin (EBIT) improved to nearly 12% from 10% in fiscal 1998. Going forward, aggressive advertising will likely remain a key component in the company's efforts to further strengthen its brand name and increase its market share.
Despite the substantial improvements in Sealy's profitability during 1999, additional margin improvements could be difficult to achieve. Profit enhancements may only be modest and largely the result of greater capacity.
Reflecting Sealy's stronger cash flow, its EBITA leverage has declined since late 1997 and its other credit measures have also improved from weaker levels. With total debt of nearly $707 million at August 29, 1999, almost 65% of which was secured bank debt, the company's trailing twelve month debt-to-EBITA stood at approximately 5.7-times (5.2-times EBITDA) versus nearly 7.0-times EBITA (6.3-times EBITDA) at the end of fiscal 1998. Additionally, EBITA-to-total interest expense has improved to almost 2-times (2.1-times using EBITDA) from 1.5-times (1.6-times using EBITDA) during the same period. Additional improvements in the company's full year 1999 leverage and interest coverage are possible. After spending a heavy $33.1 million on capital expenditures during 1998, largely due to the acquisitions of new facilities in High Point, North Carolina, management scaled back to $21 million over the last twelve months. Retained cash (EBITDA minus Capex minus cash interest expense minus taxes) remains fairly modest at roughly 8% of total funded debt.
Notwithstanding the notable reduction in Sealy's EBITA leverage, Moody's remains cautious with regard to its future debt levels. The potential is high for either debt-financed acquisitions or other expansion-related investments. Sealy will likely focus on aggressively grow its cashflow rather than reducing its debt. The company's financial flexibility benefits from substantial unused availability under the $100 million revolving credit facility.
During the third quarter of 1999, Sealy contributed $29.8 million, primarily cash, to Mattress Holdings International, LLC (MHI) a company controlled by Sealy's controlling stockholder, Bain Capital, Inc. The company's investment in MHI was used to enhance business relationships and to help build incremental retail sales. Although additional contributions are likely, they are currently limited to 5% of its total assets.
Headquartered in High Point, North Carolina, Sealy Corporation is the largest bedding manufacturer in North America. It manufacturers and sells a complete line of mattress and box springs, including those sold under the Sealy, Sealy Posturepedic, and Stearns and Foster brand names. The company's sales approach $980 million.
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.