MOODY'S CONFIRMS OHIO UTILITY RATINGS
Moody's Investors Service confirmed the ratings on 11 utilities serving electric customers in the state of Ohio. The state passed its electric restructuring bill on June 22, 1999, after intense and lengthy negotiations. The bill's final form garnered tremendous support, as evidenced by the House's 87-to-9 vote and the Senate's 29-to-3 vote. The bill makes choice of generation supplier available to all customers on January 1, 2001, with a modest rate reduction for residential customers. The Ohio legislature left details regarding stranded cost recovery and other aspects of the transition to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO), but reduced uncertainty about many aspects of the transition. Moody's regards the structural features established by the bill as neutral for the Ohio companies, noting that the significant financial implications will result from the PUCO proceedings. The rating agency continues to anticipate at least moderate amounts of stranded cost recovery in current ratings.
The legislation's major tax policy changes removed what had been significant hurdles to electric sector restructuring. Utilities will now collect taxes based upon kilowatt-hour customer usage rather than utility revenue dollars. Also, utility electric generation property will now be taxed at the 25% corporate property tax rate while the transmission and distribution property will continue to be taxed at 88%. The bill's tax revenue reimbursement provisions minimize the impact of the property tax change on counties and other localities which are dependent upon these taxes, particularly for school funding.
Municipal utilities are excluded from the bill's provisions, and co-ops can elect to retain their certified service areas with some flexibility, thus also being excluded from its provisions. While they may not be directly affected by its provisions if they choose to be excluded, they none-the-less will be influenced by the changing market structure within the state. Moody's will examine this impact as the market and management strategy evolve.
The ratings and outlooks confirmed for the investor-owned utilities are:
Cincinnati Gas and Electric, Senior Secured A3, Outlook Stable;
Cleveland Electric Illuminating, Senior Secured Ba1, Outlook Stable;
Columbus Southern Power Company, Senior Secured A3, Outlook Stable;
Dayton Power and Light Company, Senior Secured Aa3, Outlook Stable;
Monongahela Power Company, Senior Secured A1, Outlook Stable;
Ohio Edison Company, Senior Secured Baa2, Outlook Stable;
Ohio Power Company, Senior Secured A3, Outlook Stable; and
Toledo Edison Company, Senior Secured Ba1, Outlook Stable.
The ratings and outlooks confirmed for the large joint municipal power agency, municipal utility, and co-op within the state are:
American Municipal Power (AMP - Ohio), Project One Revenue Bonds A1, Outlook Stable;
Cleveland Public Power, Revenue Bonds A2, Outlook Stable; and
Buckeye Power, Senior Secured A1 and Commercial Paper P-1; Outlook Stable.
The fact that stranded cost details have been delegated to the PUCO is probably one major reason the bill was passed this year. Political wrangling over the details of stranded cost recovery might otherwise have proved too contentious to allow passage. The state's utilities have widely diverse exposures to potentially stranded costs - those historical costs that might not have been recoverable in competitive markets. The utilities must file a request for stranded cost recovery with the PUCO within 90 days of the bill's effective date, and the PUCO is required to respond with a final order by October 31, 2000. The bill allows stranded cost recovery over a period of up to 5 years, and possibly 10 years for regulatory assets, beginning January 2001. Stranded costs will be recovered either through frozen rates for those customers who prefer to stay with the incumbent utility as their generation supplier, or through a competitive transition charge (CTC) determined through the PUCO filing.
The restructuring bill sets January 1, 2001, as the date all customers will be able to choose their electric generation supplier. That date is also the commencement of what the state is calling the five-year market development period. All residential customers will receive a five percent reduction in their generating cost portion of their bills on that date to ensure that they also see some of the benefits of competition. Bilateral contracts negotiated previously between utilities and their large customers are preserved during the market development period. FirstEnergy's utilities (Cleveland Electric Illuminating, Ohio Edison, and Toledo Edison) will continue their current rate reduction plans through the market development period. Rates are otherwise frozen at levels reflecting the modest residential generation rate cut.
The bill designates electric generation, aggregation service (called "supply" in the UK and Australia), power marketing, and power brokering as services that will be fully subject to competition on January 1, 2001. Certain other services will be subject to competition once certain conditions are met. The utilities will be required to legally separate competitively offered services from the regulated transmission and distribution services when competition arrives, unless a plan justifying cost allocation under functional separation is approved by the PUCO. Moody's expects utilities to pursue functional separation at this point and to present their cost-allocation plans as part of the PUCO filing. However, they may choose to legally separate transmission and distribution from generation and other competitively offered services at some point, which may have negative implications for fixed income investors.
To deal with potential market power issues, the bill requires membership in an independent regional transmission organization (RTO) for any utility owning or controlling transmission. The state's utilities are pursuing two separate types of RTO, the Alliance and the Midwest Independent System Operator. Both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates wholesale transmission, and the PUCO prefer to see one, broad RTO, but currently allow some flexibility as differences between the two approaches are ironed out. The legislation does not require generation asset divestiture.
A summary of the bill can be found on the web at www.lsc.state.oh.us/analyses/s0003-rh.pfd.
© 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.