Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
27 Sep 2004
MOODY'S DOWNGRADES ENERGEN CORP.'S DEBT RATINGS (TO Baa2 SR. UNS.) AND CONFIRMS ALABAMA GAS CO.'S (A1 SR. UNS.), BOTH WITH STABLE OUTLOOKS
Approximately $560 Million of Debt Securities Affected
New York, September 27, 2004 -- Moody's Investors Service downgraded the debt ratings of Energen
Corporation (Holdco) to Baa2 senior unsecured/(P)Baa2 senior unsecured
shelf from Baa1/(P)Baa1 and confirmed those of its utility subsidiary
Alabama Gas Company (Alagasco, the utility) at A1 senior unsecured.
Energen's ratings are downgraded to reflect greater exposure to
E&P activities, notably the mounting execution risk in continuing
to grow its E&P business so as to meet its stated long-term
earnings growth targets. The confirmation of Alagasco's ratings
at a rating level four notches above Energen's reflect our view
that the utility's credit profile remains unaffected by its parent
or Energen Resources (Resources, Energen's E&P subsidiary),
and that there is a measure of protection provided by regulatory oversight.
The rating outlook is stable for both entities, acknowledging management's
financially conservative and steadfast approach to its business model
and a proven track record in its "acquire & exploit" E&P
strategy. These rating actions end a rating review prompted by
Energen's recent debt-financed $263 million acquisition
of natural gas reserves in the San Juan Basin by Resources and a re-assessment
of Alagasco's relationship with Energen and Resources.
These rating actions tie Energen's rating more closely to the business
risk profile of Resources' E&P business -- less
to that of Alagasco -- and better reflect Energen's role as
the financing vehicle for Resources. Resources has steadily developed
over time to comprise roughly 70% of Energen's capitalization,
earnings, and cash flow. Given the critical mass that it
has accrued, Resources faces a rising hurdle in continuing to grow
at a pace that will enable Energen to meet its target average EPS growth
of 7-8% a year. Given the natural declines in its
existing reserve base, Resources will be challenged to make periodic
sizable acquisitions. This execution risk is magnified by higher
than historical capital outlays that Resources would need to make amidst
rising reserve acquisition multiples, which reflect high commodity
prices and declining production in mature North America basins.
Indeed, in the five-year period ending 2008, Energen
budgets $1 billion of reserve acquisitions -- about the same
amount it has spent over the course of the past nine years and increasing
the level of execution risk per acquisition.
The four-notch rating differential between Energen and Alagasco
reflects the distinct financial positions that the company maintains for
each of its two sole lines of business. There is no operational
integration between the two. The fact that Alagasco is a SEC registrant
separate from Energen highlights its discrete, self-financing
nature. Alagasco enjoys no explicit ring-fencing provisions
from regulatory or financing agreements other than broad restrictions
under an Alabama state statute. Nevertheless, the requirement
for Alagasco to get regulatory approval before any financing helps to
prevent a debt-financed distribution of such a size that would
weaken Alagasco's credit quality. Moody's believes
that such a scenario is highly unlikely given Energen's conservative
management and the relative strength of Resources. Alagasco generates
little if any excess cash flow that could be swept to Holdco or to support
The stable rating outlooks anticipate Energen's continuing to execute
on its long-held "acquire & exploit" E&P strategy
with consistent results, including realizing expected levels of
incremental production from the newly-acquired San Juan properties
over the next two years. In addition, we assume that Energen
maintains its conservative financial policies. The outlook incorporates
periodic gas reserve acquisitions to the extent that they are in keeping
with Energen's well-articulated five-year plan,
acquisition criteria, and financial policies. The ratings
anticipate acquisitions of a size that more than offset natural declines
in Resources' existing reserves so as to manage Energen's
business mix at near current levels over time (assets and earnings derived
from E&P no higher than in the 70% range; the balance
from Alagasco), while maintaining F&D costs at around its current
historic levels and continuing its record of organic reserve replacement.
A rating downgrade could result if an acquisition veers significantly
from the company's long-held parameters (e.g.,
long-lived North American onshore gas reserves with exploitation
potential, expected production mostly hedged), is unduly debt-financed,
or produces results significantly below expectations.
Energen's asset mix and business and financial model make a rating
upgrade unlikely in the foreseeable future. Financial performance
that varies significantly from our expectations will cause us to reassess
Energen's ratings. Among those financial measures that we
will monitor include, on a consolidated basis: adequate financial
flexibility as measured by the ability to generate free cash flow after
production replacement, earnings retention (dividend payouts expected
in the 20% range), and capitalization (debt ratio expected
in the 40% range). At Resources, key indicators include:
full-cycle costs in the high teens/boe, drillbit F&D
costs in the $5/boe range, and debt burden on proven developed
reserves in the $2/boe range. For Alagasco, key metrics
include: retained cash flow/debt at around 20%, dividend
payouts in the 70% range, and debt/capital in the 40%
For Alagasco, we expect continued consistent results to be derived
from the Rate Stabilization and Equalization mechanism (RSE, a self-adjusting
rate formula which is in place at least through 1/1/08), weather
normalization, a supportive regulatory environment, and a
management committed to maintaining Alagasco's capital structure
in line with allowed levels under the RSE (ROE a band of 13.15%
to 13.65%, 60% equity/capital cap).
These underpinnings should result in gradual, small increases in
earnings over time from normal additions to rate base. We do not
expect external growth at Alagasco. Given Alagasco's stability,
any change in its rating could be a result of a currently unanticipated
change in its regulatory framework or Energen's financing model
that exposes Alagasco's credit more to those of Energen and Resources.
ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES' OPERATIONS
Over the past nine years since Energen initiated its E&P growth strategy,
Resources' reserves have steadily grown 15-fold to roughly
230 million boe, solidifying its position among independent U.S.
oil and gas producers. From its beginnings as a Black Warrior Basin
coal bed methane Section 29 play in Energen's home base of Alabama,
Resources has cumulated a credible operating track record and a more diversified
portfolio of conventional and coal bed methane reserves in the San Juan
Basin (56% of reserves, pro forma the latest acquisition),
the Permian Basin (23%), the Black Warrior Basin (16%),
and North Louisiana/East Texas (5%). Its reserves are durable:
mostly proven developed (about 80%) with an above-average
reserve life (proven developed R/P of 13 years).
Resources has increased its reserves steadily through acquisitions every
other year or so to offset natural declines of about 8% a year,
supplemented by internal additions from exploiting its existing non-producing
and undeveloped reserves. It engages in nominal exploration activity.
Resources' operating metrics are solid. The company has been
successful in maintaining better than average reserve replacement and
F&D costs (all-sources F&D costs of just under $5/boe)
while improving cash-on-cash returns (leveraged full-cycle
ratios recently in the 300% range). Resources has been conservatively
financed ($2/boe of proven developed reserves and about $2
interest/boe produced). It continually hedges the majority of its
expected production (over 80% of production hedged for the rest
of 2004, about 60% hedged currently for 2005) in order to
ensure meeting its earnings targets (7-8% average annual
eps growth) and continuing its record of modest annual dividend increases.
In August, Energen paid $263 million to purchase 40 mmboe
of San Juan reserves, half of which are behind pipe and undeveloped.
In addition, it expects to spend $50 million in developing
these properties. The consideration paid is about $102,800/boe
current daily production, $122,400/boe based on all-in
for future development costs. The full valuation reflects Energen's
expectation of doubling production from these properties over the next
two years and desire to intensify acreage in a core area. The valuation
and 100% debt financing entailed in this acquisition place an onus
on the company to realize expected incremental production over this time
frame. This concern is mitigated by Resources' familiarity
of the area (it has seven years of experience in the San Juan Basin,
including acreage nearby), long experience in coal bed methane (mostly
in the Black Warrior, and more recently the Fruitland coal in the
San Juan where the new reserves are located) and approvals in hand to
down-space locations in the acquired properties.
Headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, Energen Corporation
is a holding company whose subsidiaries engage in natural gas and crude
oil production and natural gas distribution.
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.