Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
18 Oct 2001
MOODY'S LOWERS FORD'S RATING TO A3; CONFIRMS A2 LONG-TERM AND P-1 SHORT-TERM RATING OF FORD CREDIT; AND, LOWERS HERTZ'S RATING TO Baa1. OUTLOOK FOR ALL COMPANIES IS NEGATIVE.
Approximately $41.5 Billion of Debt Securities Affected.
New York, October 18, 2001 -- Moody's Investors Service lowered the senior debt rating of Ford Motor
Company to A3 from A2, and confirmed the A2 long-term and
Prime-1 short-term ratings of Ford Motor Credit.
The rating outlook for both companies is negative. Moody's also
lowered the long- and short-term ratings of Hertz Corporation
to Baa1 from A3 and to Prime-2 from Prime-1 respectively.
The rating outlook for Hertz is Negative. These rating actions
conclude a review for possible downgrade that was initiated on August
The downgrade of Ford's rating reflects the erosion in the company's longer-term
competitive position in North America. This erosion stems from
the increasingly competitive environment in the high-margin U.S.
SUV, light truck and minivan markets, which accounts for the
majority of Ford's earnings and cash flow. Moreover, the
returns generated by Ford's domestic car operations and its international
business have been chronically poor. In contrast, many of
its non-U.S. competitors have a more diversified
earnings stream: they earn acceptable returns on cars sold in the
U.S. where they have a younger and more affluent customer
base within the U.S. car market relative to Ford; they
are entering the lucrative U.S. truck, SUV and minivan
markets; and, they also enjoy solid profitability in their
This weakening in Ford's competitive position is occurring as the U.S.
automobile market is entering a cyclical downturn that could be exacerbated
by the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. This
will create a very challenging near-term environment for the company,
and will result in weak cash generation and debt protection measures through
2002. In response, Ford is undertaking various restructuring
initiatives intended to reduce employment levels and lower capacity.
It is also contemplating further initiatives that could reshape its operating
structure and strengthen the rebound in financial performance that would
accompany the eventual recovery in the U.S. automotive market.
Subsequent to past cyclical downturns, various restructuring and
product enhancement programs undertaken by Ford, in combination
with rising demand, have enabled it to enjoy a robust recovery in
earning, cash generation and debt protection measures. Ford's
ability to successfully lay the groundwork for an operational and financial
recovery when the U.S. market picks up will be critical
to sustaining the current rating level and to avoiding additional pressure
on the A3 rating.
Ford's negative outlook reflects the uncertainty surrounding the potential
depth and duration of the current downturn, the scope of the restructuring
efforts that might ultimately be implemented by the company, and
the degree to which its financial performance will improve when demand
recovers. We expect that over the coming quarters, the likely
severity of the U.S. downturn and the full scope of Ford's
restructuring efforts will become more clear. During this period,
Moody's will have an opportunity to more precisely assess the timing and
magnitude of the cash costs associated with the full range of any restructuring
efforts to be implemented by Ford, the impact that these efforts
will have on the company's fixed cost position and break-even levels,
and the degree to which the company can lay an effective foundation for
strengthening its financial performance beyond 2002. Important
considerations in assessing this foundation will include: 1) Ford's
ability to reduce domestic capacity, lower hourly wage and benefit
expenditures, consolidate platforms, and achieve additional
efficiencies in both its supplier and dealer networks; and,
2) the market share, pricing and industry-shipment assumptions
that are the back drop for Ford's future operating model.
Ford's liquidity position should afford it with adequate financial flexibility
as its operating model and the market environment take shape over the
near term. At the end of the third quarter Ford's manufacturing
operations had a sizable liquidity position based on cash, marketable
securities and VEBA balances of approximately $15 billion,
and the exceptionally long 28-year average life of its $12.1
billion in debt. Moreover, Ford's decisions to cut its dividend
and to pursue other near-term cash conservation efforts will be
constructive. Despite a potential underfunded pension liability
based on recent market performance, Moody's expects that Ford's
intermediate-term funding requirements for this liability should
be relatively modest. We also anticipate expenditures associated
with tire-related litigation will not represent a material drain
The confirmation of Ford Motor Credit Company's ratings are based on the
company's sound operating and financial position, the high quality
and liquidity of its assets, its importance to Ford, and the
relatively stronger position of the finance company's creditors vis-a-vis
the parent's. The finance subsidiary's ratings are closely linked
with Ford's given the interrelationship and business ties between the
two companies; yet Ford Credit remains positioned to operate as a
prudent finance company, with more stable business metrics through
economic cycles. Moody's believes that these finance company characteristics
present an incrementally better credit proposition for debt investors
than do the parent's, and the one-notch rating differential
reflects this conclusion.
Moody's believes that Ford Credit is a well-managed, technologically
sophisticated finance company. The company has operated with sound
levels of alternative liquidity to support both its debt-paying
ability and its ongoing business operations through market stresses,
and is well-positioned today. Short-term debt levels
have declined materially through 2001, with the finance company
making greater use of the long-term and short-term structured
finance markets. One consequence is a vastly increased level of
bank line coverage of outstanding commercial paper. Moody's also
noted that weakness in the auto market, and the economy generally,
will continue to be adverse credit factors: financng customer performance
is weakening, Ford's new car volumes and pricing are under pressure,
and the residual valuations on off-lease vehicles are under stress.
Yet Moody's believes that Ford Credit's underwriting, pricing and
credit reserve policies, as well as its asset-linked capital
standards, provide appropriate protection against market cyclicality.
Ford Credit's overall position is strongly influenced by its multifaceted
relationship with Ford. Ford's new vehicle sales volume directly
influences Ford Credit's origination volumes, and vehicle quality
and pricing influence lease residual valuations. The parent's marketing
policies influence the loan-versus-lease decision and financing
customer quality, with deep incentives attracting higher-quality
borrowers. Also, Ford is effectively an obligor to Ford Credit,
because Ford reimburses the credit company for any incentivized retail
loans back to market rate, over the term of the loans.
Nonetheless, Moody's believes that the position of Ford Credit's
debtholders is and will remain incrementally stronger than that of Ford's
creditors. The rating agency concluded that Ford Credit's debt
and equity constituents are both motivated to ensure that the company
maintains sufficiently prudent financial metrics, operating standards,
and asset quality measures to continue its operations through any range
of stresses. Ford Credit provides exceptional services to Ford
by ensuring that financing is available to its dealers and targeted retail
customers, even through economic stresses, and by serving
as a customer relations link. In this regard, the highly
liquid nature of prime auto finance loans, including a deep securitization
market, provides flexibility for the finance company to provide
these services, even through a difficult environment, if it
continues to operate prudently. For these same reasons, Moody's
believes that the current protocols of intercompany independence will
be broadly maintained. Moody's long-term debt ratings are
opinions about the likelihood of default as well as recovery or loss upon
default. In light of its expectations as to Ford Credit's ongoing
operations, the rating agency indicated that the superior recovery
prospects for the finance company creditors, although unlikely to
be tested, warrants a single notch rating differential from the
The downgrade of the Hertz rating and its negative outlook reflect the
erosion in the company's operations due to the severely weakened environment
for business and leisure travel in the U.S. This weakness
is the result of the general slow down in the U.S. economy,
and the additional burdens placed on the travel industry following the
terrorist attacks. The rating action also reflects the significant
operational and financial relationship between Hertz and Ford.
Hertz is the single largest buyer of Ford vehicles; Ford is Hertz's
largest supplier of fleet vehicles; it provides most of these vehicles
on a repurchase basis; and, Ford extends a $500 mil.
liquidity facility to Hertz. In addition, Ford has recently
increased its ownership of Hertz to 100% from 82%.
This relationship has provided a lift to Hertz's long-term and
short-term ratings. Consequently, the erosion in Ford's
credit quality diminishes the degree of ratings lift afforded to Hertz.
In taking this rating action on Ford and Ford Motor Credit Company Moody's
noted that it is continuing its review of the A2 long-term and
Prime-1 short-term ratings of General Motors Corporation
(GM) and General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) for possible downgrade.
GM faces many of the same competitive and cycilcal-downturn challenges
facing Ford. Moody's anticipates that it will shortly conclude
the review of GM's operational and competitive challenges, and resolve
issues relating to the possibility of GM and GMAC having different long-
and short-term ratings.
Ford Motor Company, headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan,
is the world's second largest automobile manufacturer. Ford Motor
Credit Company, also headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan,
is the world's largest auto finance company.
Hertz Corporation, headquartered in Park Ridge, New Jersey,
is the world's largest rent-a-car company and is a leader
in the rental and lease of construction and material handling equipment.
Jay A. Siegel
Senior Vice President
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: (215) 967-6233
SUBSCRIBERS: (215) 967-6233
J. Bruce Clark
Senior Vice President
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: (215) 967-6233
SUBSCRIBERS: (215) 967-6233
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.