MOODY'S UPGRADES SOME KMART RATINGS (SR. UNSECURED TO Ba1); RATING OUTLOOK IS POSITIVE
Moody's Investors Service raised the ratings on the debt and preferred stock and confirmed the Not Prime commercial paper rating of Kmart Corporation based on the company's ongoing progress in improving merchandising, operations, and financial performance. The rating outlook is positive. Prospectively, the company's ratings could be raised if it continues to improve its financial performance. Key to that improvement is a successful upgrade of its management information systems and logistics, thereby enabling the firm to make additional meaningful progress in improving merchandising and operations and further enhancing earnings, cash flow and debt protection measures. This completes the rating review begun on March 2, 1999.
Ratings upgraded are:
Kmart Corporation -- $2.5 billion bank revolving credit facility; senior unsecured debt, medium term notes, guaranteed industrial development bonds, and its issuer rating to Ba1 from Ba2; non-guaranteed industrial development bonds, and lease certificates to Ba3 from B1; unsecured senior debt shelf registration to (P)Ba1 from (P)Ba2; subordinated debt shelf registration to (P)Ba3 from (P)B1; preferred stock shelf registration to (P)"ba3" from (P)"b1"
S. S. Kresge Company -- guaranteed industrial development revenue bonds to Ba1 from Ba2.
Kmart Financing I -- Guaranteed Trust Convertible Preferred Securities to "ba3" from "b1"; preferred stock shelf registration to (P)"ba3" from (P)"b1".
Kmart Financing II -- Preferred stock shelf registration to (P)"ba3" from (P)"b1".
Kmart Financing III -- Preferred stock shelf registration to (P)"ba3" from (P)"b1".
Kmart Financing IV -- Preferred stock shelf registration to (P)"ba3" from (P)"b1".
Ratings confirmed are:
Kmart Corporation -- the company's rating for commercial paper at Not Prime.
During the last few years, Kmart management has made substantial progress in improving its performance. This improvement is evident across the business. In the areas of merchandising, Kmart's initial roll-out and subsequent line extensions of home products under the Martha Stewart brand has met with resounding success. The Sesame Street children's apparel is likely to be another successful product line and point of differentiation for the company over the long-term. Further, the significant improvement in women's apparel area represents a return to the level of productivity not seen in the women's area since 1996. The company's Pantry concept is appealing to time-starved consumers and assists in boosting sales productivity. These initiatives or successes are indicative of both greater product and customer knowledge and also reflect Kmart's success in beginning to again connect with its traditional customer. On the operations side of the business, the company has continued to reduce its cost structure to a more competitive level and has improved its in-stock level and customer service.
The rapid growth of discount store retailing and the ongoing consolidation occurring in this segment of retailing is raising the bar for all competitors as stronger competitors prosper and weaker competitors fall by the wayside. This trend will continue to pressure Kmart to further increase its sales productivity, improve its systems and logistics, enhance in-stocks, and remain cost competitive. During the last few years, the pricing environment in discount retailing has been relatively benign, giving competitors some pricing flexibility. However, should the economy slow or should Wal-Mart, the pricing leader, decide to increase its pricing aggressiveness to gain share, Kmart could find it more difficult to increase sales or maintain margins. Further, the raising of the competitive bar is requiring that Kmart and its competitors consistently execute strategies effectively if they are to prosper. In the past, Kmart has suffered from poor execution of strategies, such as occurred in the women's apparel area in 1997. Given the tougher competitive environment and the importance of execution, Moody's will continue to consider to what extent there will be consistency and sustainability to Kmart's execution of strategies.
Kmart has achieved solid comparable store sales growth, in part as a result of its roll-out of the Big K format. The company expects to complete the roll-out of this format during the next year. Thereafter, Kmart can pursue a number of different strategies to enhance growth and shareholder returns. As part of the evaluation of Kmart's ongoing credit quality, Moody's will consider Kmart's ongoing financial flexibility, its growth strategies, and any strategies the company could employ to enhance shareholder value and/or achieve further growth or enhance earnings or returns.
Key to any further rating upgrade is whether improved earnings, cash flow, and debt protection measures are consistently sustainable. Integral to achieving that performance over the long-term, Moody's believes, is improvement in merchandising and operations which require enhanced logistics and management information system capabilities. Kmart management has worked both internally and with external consultants to identify the areas requiring attention and investment and these initiatives are a top priority for the firm. Development and implementation of strategies has begun and the company has initiated a search for a new Chief Information Officer. Progress in these areas, Moody's believes, are of critical importance in improving the company's competitive position and thereby its earnings and cash flow.
Kmart Corporation, headquartered in Troy, Michigan, is one of the largest discount retailers in the United States.
© 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.