Approximately $205.3 Million of Structured Securities Affected
New York, August 08, 2012 -- Moody's has affirmed all classes of Notes issued by Crest 2003-2,
Ltd. due to key transaction parameters performing within levels
commensurate with the existing ratings levels. The rating action
is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial
real estate collateralized debt obligation (CRE CDO and Re-Remic)
transactions.
Moody's rating action is as follows:
Cl. A-1, Affirmed at Aa2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Aa2 (sf)
Cl. A-2, Affirmed at Aa2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Aa2 (sf)
Cl. A-3, Affirmed at Aa2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Aa2 (sf)
Cl. B-1, Affirmed at Baa2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Baa2 (sf)
Cl. B-2, Affirmed at Baa2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Baa2 (sf)
Cl. C-1, Affirmed at Ba2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)
Cl. C-2, Affirmed at Ba2 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)
Cl. D-1, Affirmed at Caa1 (sf); previously on
Aug 17, 2011 Downgraded to Caa1 (sf)
Cl. D-2, Affirmed at Caa1 (sf); previously on
Aug 17, 2011 Downgraded to Caa1 (sf)
Cl. E-1, Affirmed at Caa3 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Caa3 (sf)
Cl. E-2, Affirmed at Caa3 (sf); previously on
Oct 27, 2010 Downgraded to Caa3 (sf)
RATINGS RATIONALE
Crest 2003-2, Ltd. is a static CRE CDO transaction
backed by a portfolio of commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS)
(88.6% of the pool balance), real estate investment
trust (REIT) debt (5.3%), credit tenant leases (CTL)
(3.6%) and one CRE CDO class (2.3%).
As of the June 28, 2012 Trustee report, the aggregate Note
balance of the transaction has decreased to $258.9 million
from $325.0 million at issuance, with the paydown
directed to the Class A-1, Class A-2 and Class A-3
Notes.
There are six assets with a par balance of $24.5 million
(9.6% of the current pool balance) that are considered credit
risk securities and seventeen assets with a par balance of $61.2
million (24.0% of the current pool balance) that are considered
defaulted securities as of the June 28, 2012 Trustee report.
While there have been minimal realized losses to date, Moody's
does expect significant losses to occur to the credit risk and defaulted
securities.
Moody's has identified the following parameters as key indicators of the
expected loss within CRE CDO transactions: weighted average rating
factor (WARF), weighted average life (WAL), weighted average
recovery rate (WARR), and Moody's asset correlation (MAC).
These parameters are typically modeled as actual parameters for static
deals and as covenants for managed deals.
WARF is a primary measure of the credit quality of a CRE CDO pool.
We have completed updated assessments for the non-Moody's rated
collateral. The bottom-dollar WARF is a measure of the default
probability within a collateral pool. Moody's modeled a bottom-dollar
WARF of 3,829 compared to 3,351 at last review. The
current distribution of Moody's rated collateral and assessments
for non-Moody's rated collateral is as follows: Aaa-Aa3
(4.2% compared to 3.6% at last review),
A1-A3 (2.8% compared to 5.8% at last
review), Baa1-Baa3 (16.1% compared to 18.8%
at last review), Ba1-Ba3 (27.2% compared to
30.4% at last review), B1-B3 (14.5%
compared to 14.8% at last review), and Caa1-C
(35.2% compared to 26.7% at last review).
WAL acts to adjust the probability of default of the collateral in the
pool for time. Moody's modeled to a WAL of 2.3 compared
to 1.9 at last review.
WARR is the par-weighted average of the mean recovery values for
the collateral assets in the pool. Moody's modeled a fixed
WARR of 13.1% compared to 14.7% at last review.
MAC is a single factor that describes the pair-wise asset correlation
to the default distribution among the instruments within the collateral
pool (i.e. the measure of diversity). Moody's
modeled a MAC of 7.7% compared to 8.9% at
last review.
Moody's review incorporated CDOROM® v2.8, one of Moody's
CDO rating models, which was released on January 24, 2011.
The cash flow model, CDOEdge® v3.2.1.2,
was used to analyze the cash flow waterfall and its effect on the capital
structure of the deal.
Changes in any one or combination of the key parameters may have rating
implications on certain classes of rated notes. However,
in many instances, a change in key parameter assumptions in certain
stress scenarios may be offset by a change in one or more of the other
key parameters. Rated notes are particularly sensitive to changes
in recovery rate assumptions. Holding all other key parameters
static, changing the recovery rate assumption down from 13.1%
to 3.1% or up to 23.1% would result in average
rating movement on the rated tranches of 0 to 2 notches downward and 0
to 2 notches upward, respectively.
The performance expectations for a given variable indicate Moody's forward-looking
view of the likely range of performance over the medium term. From
time to time, Moody's may, if warranted, change these
expectations. Performance that falls outside the given range may
indicate that the collateral's credit quality is stronger or weaker than
Moody's had anticipated when the related securities ratings were issued.
Even so, a deviation from the expected range will not necessarily
result in a rating action nor does performance within expectations preclude
such actions. The decision to take (or not take) a rating action
is dependent on an assessment of a range of factors including, but
not exclusively, the performance metrics.
Primary sources of assumption uncertainty are the extent of growth in
the current macroeconomic environment and commercial real estate property
markets. While commercial real estate property values are beginning
to move in a positive direction along with a rise in investment activity
and stabilization in core property type performance, a consistent
upward trend will not be evident until the volume of investment activity
steadily increases, distressed properties are cleared from the pipeline,
and job creation rebounds. The hotel sector is performing strongly
and the multifamily sector continues to show increases in demand.
Moderate improvements in the office sector continue with minimal additions
to supply. However, office demand is closely tied to employment,
where growth remains slow. Performance in the retail sector has
been mixed with lackluster sales driven by discounting and promotions.
However, rising wages and reduced unemployment, along with
increased consumer confidence, is helping to spur consumer spending.
Across all property sectors, the availability of debt capital continues
to improve with increased securitization activity of commercial real estate
loans supported by a monetary policy of low interest rates. Moody's
central global macroeconomic scenario reflects healthier growth in the
US and US growth decoupling from the recessionary trend in the euro zone,
while a mild recession is expected in 2012. Downside risks remain
significant, although they have moderated compared to earlier this
year. Major downside risks include an increase in the potential
magnitude of the euro area recession, the risk of an oil supply
shock weighing negatively on consumer purchasing power and home prices,
ongoing and policy-induced banking sector deleveraging leading
to a tightening of bank lending standards and credit contraction,
financial market turmoil continuing to negatively impact consumer and
business confidence, persistently high unemployment levels,
and weak housing markets, any or all of which will continue to constrain
growth.
The methodologies used in this rating were "Moody's Approach to Rating
SF CDOs" published in May 2012, and "Moody's Approach to Rating
Commercial Real Estate CDOs" published in July 2011. Please see
the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these
methodologies.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued
by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's
Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf,
London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has
issued the rating.
Milan Parikh
Associate Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Michael Gerdes
MD - Structured Finance
Structured Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's Affirms All Classes of Crest 2003-2, Ltd.