Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's Assigns Aa2 Rating to LADWP (CA) - Power Revenue Bonds

Global Credit Research - 01 Mar 2017

New York, March 01, 2017 -- Issue: Power System Revenue Bonds, 2017 Series B; Rating: Aa2; Rating Type: Underlying LT; Sale Amount: $346,000,000; Expected Sale Date: 03/07/2017; Rating Description: Revenue: Government Enterprise

Summary Rating Rationale

Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's (CA) (LADWP) $346 million Power System Revenue Bonds, 2017 Series B. Moody's has maintained the Aa2 rating on LADWP's $8.5 billion of outstanding parity revenue bonds. The outlook is stable.

The current offering is a refunding for present value savings of outstanding Power System Revenue Bonds 2007 Series A, Subseries A-1 and Subseries A-2.

The rating recognizes the strong supportiveness of the Los Angeles Mayor and City Council reflected in the 2016 approval of an annual increase in the base rate for the next five years. Moreover, the rate action incorporated changes to LADWP's electric rate structure that provides additional cost recovery stability to maintain financial strength while LADWP's management transforms the electric utility's power resource mix. In addition, as reflected in the electric utility's forecasts, adherence to board policy financial metric targets and the addition of new sources of financial liquidity have maintained a sound credit position.

The audited FY 2016 financial results and forecasted FY 2017 adjusted debt service coverage were both in excess of two times coverage. Fixed charge coverage averaged 1.60 times between 2014-2016 and was 1.79 times in FY 2016. Days liquidity on hand remains strong.

The Aa2 rating includes our consideration of LADWP's flexibility as an unregulated monopoly providing essential electricity service to customers in Los Angeles, California (City of Los Angeles rated Aa2). The rating considers as a strength the benefits of size (LADWP is the largest U.S. municipal electric utility); the utility's diverse and competitive power supply; and its ownership, control and reliable operation of a transmission network that represents about 25% of the state's transmission grid. Importantly, such control gives LADWP the ability to manage both carbon reduction and meet its renewable energy portfolio requirements more effectively than if it were part of the state's restructured market. LADWP has no dominant customers and has very competitive retail rates relative to the state average and more specifically, relative to Southern California Edison Company (SCE: A2 stable). LADWP's transition out of its dependence on coal-fired generation, the associated execution risk of its transformative power resource plan and the expected increased debt leverage are risks. LADWP's record of strong management of its power supply and its measured approach at implementing changes to meet state regulatory requirements are a positive.

Our rating acknowledges that while LADWP has had a more complicated process for setting electric rates than typically found for a municipal utility, the recent rate process has yielded several important changes to strengthen LADWP's flexibility in meeting challenges ahead.

We anticipate LADWP continuing to execute its carbon reduction plan despite an expected slower federal regulatory pace. LADWP remains in compliance with the numerous state statutes and executive orders dealing with carbon reduction and renewable energy standards. In 2016, LADWP provided its retail load with 25% of energy from renewable sources. In this vein, we believe LADWP's 2016 acquisition of a portion of the Mead Phoenix and Mead Adelanto transmission lines will assist it with a focus on reliability in the further integration of renewables regionally into its power supply mix. The transmission line acquisition through the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) has linked LADWP with the Palo Verde energy hub, providing more opportunities for lower cost energy. That said, a new executive order by Governor Brown requires electric utilities to achieve by 2030, 50% of their retail demand served with renewable energy and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 40% from 1990 levels. This represents significant new challenges.

As part of this longer-term challenge is the planned reduction in coal-fired generation as part of LADWP's fuel mix. LADWP's divestiture from the Navajo coal unit is now complete. However, potential stranded cost questions remain regarding the future of the 1,800 MW coal-fired Intermountain Power Plant (IPP) after the 2027 IPP contract ends. Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) is in discussions to locate at the site by 2025 a natural gas fired plant or another energy production technology. There are also questions about the role of the Southern Transmission System (STS), a major transmission line from IPP to southern California that is owned by IPA, in which LADWP is the major participant through a take-or-pay contract with SCPPA for 59.5% of total STS debt obligations amounting to $330 million.

We think additional debt leverage could potentially create rate pressure as LADWP continues to finance improvements to the reliability of the distribution system, the repowering of its coastal natural gas units, and the procurement of new renewable and gas fired energy resources. The LADWP capital improvement plan is $8.1 billion over the next five years. Importantly, and a key data point in our stable outlook, is the fact that after the five year capital improvement plan is completed, LADWP's debt ratio is expected to remain near current level of around 70% as the principal is amortized and internal funds are contributed on a pay as you go basis to the plan.

While higher electricity rates is a longer-term potential risk, most LADWP customers on average use about 30% less electricity than the national average due to the temperate weather as a primarily coastal service territory. Generally, electricity bills are a lower percentage of household income compared to elsewhere. Also, retail rates have a volume based rate structure which somewhat protects lower income rate payers. Low power users saw a 2.5% average annual increase; medium power users 3.0% and top tier power users 4.7%. Even with higher rates in 2016-2017, LADWP remains competitive against neighboring utilities. On a prospective basis, forecasts incorporate higher retail rates to fund new debt.

We understand that while the City of Los Angeles (General Obligation, unlimited tax bonds rated Aa2; stable outlook) has been faced with related financial stress and the burdens of its past pension commitments, no additional General Transfers (above the current 8% of operating revenues) have been requested of the utility over the past several years.

Rating Outlook

The stable rating outlook reflects our view that the electric utility continues to manage well the transition of its power resources to less carbon content, while maintaining system reliability and meeting its well established record of sound finances and competitive rates. New rate structure has provided additional stability and flexibility to meet reasonable cost pressures and maintain sound financial margins.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

The long-term rating is now at one of the highest rating levels for a US public power electric utility and a higher rating would require significant and consistent improvement in financial metrics, while leverage is moderated and LADWP is successful at its power supply transformation plan.

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

If the LA City Council does not adopt sufficient future rate increases necessary to ensure that LADWP maintains expectations for financial metrics including its pension commitments

LADWP's rates become externally regulated

Costs to transition out of IPP become significant

General Fund transfer becomes a significant operating burden on the utility

Legal Security

LADWP power revenue bonds are issued pursuant to Section 609 of the City Charter and the Master Bond Resolution. The bonds are special obligations of LADWP payable only from the Power Revenue Fund. There is a sum-sufficient rate covenant and there is no debt service reserve requirement. The LADWP has maintained a Debt Reduction Trust Fund of approximately $500 million that can be used for payment of debt service. There is an additional bonds test of net income for 12 of 18 consecutive months shall amount to 1.25 times maximum annual adjusted debt service on all parity obligations. LADWP water bonds (rated Aa2) are separately-secured, payable from the Water Revenue Fund.

Use of Proceeds

2017 Series B bonds will refinance several series of outstanding bonds for present value savings.

Obligor Profile

LADWP is the third largest California electric utility in terms of consumption, behind Pacific Gas & Electric Company (A3) and SCE. LADWP is the nation's largest municipal electric utility.

Methodology

The principal methodology used in this rating was US Public Power Electric Utilities With Generation Ownership Exposure published in March 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

Regulatory Disclosures

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Daniel Aschenbach
Lead Analyst
Project Finance
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street
New York 10007
US
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Angelo Sabatelle
Additional Contact
Project Finance
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.