Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's Downgrades Slovenia's Sovereign Rating to Ba1 from Baa2, Outlook Negative

Global Credit Research - 30 Apr 2013

New York, April 30, 2013 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded Slovenia's government bond rating to Ba1 from Baa2. The outlook remains negative.

The decision to downgrade Slovenia's sovereign rating was driven by the following key factors:

1) The state of Slovenia's banking sector

2) The marked deterioration of Slovenia's government balance sheet

3) Uncertain funding prospects that heighten the probability that external assistance will be needed

RATINGS RATIONALE

The first key factor underpinning today's rating action is the ongoing turmoil in the country's banking system and the high likelihood that the sovereign will be required to provide further assistance and capital injections. Asset quality at the banks deteriorated considerably in 2012 and has continued to deteriorate since. At Nova Ljubljanska Banka (Caa2/negative/E), the country's majority state-owned lender and largest bank, non-performing loans (NPLs) reached 28.2% of total loans in 2012. NPLs reached 28% at Nova Kreditna Banka Maribor (Caa2/negative/E), the second largest bank, and were approximately 20% system-wide at end-2012. The authorities have been injecting capital and providing assistance to the three largest banks since 2011, and Moody's expects bank asset quality to continue to deteriorate given the weak economic environment. The economy entered recession once again in 2012, contracting by 2.3% as a result of the banking crisis, and Moody's forecasts that the economy will contract by a further 1.9% in 2013 before a weak recovery in 2014 where growth is expected to reach 0.2%. Risks remain skewed firmly to the downside and the economic outlook will depend to a large degree on the stabilization of the banking crisis.

Delays in establishing the Bank Asset Management Company (BAMC, the "bad bank"), following a political transition, suggest that the sovereign remains heavily exposed to contingent liabilities. Moody's estimates bank recapitalization costs in the order of 8-11% of GDP. In Moody's opinion, implementing the BAMC's mandate is essential for stabilizing the banking system.

The second key factor underlying Moody's decision to downgrade Slovenia's government bond rating is the substantial increase in Slovenia's government debt metrics. Slovenia's general government debt at the end of 2012 reached an estimated 54.1% of GDP, up from 22% in 2008. Slovenia's fiscal debt burden remains among the lowest in the euro area, where the average is approximately 93% of GDP. The ratio for Slovenia, however, is likely to exceed 60% at the end of 2013 and not expected to stabilize until 2014-15 at above 65% of GDP, excluding BAMC debt issuance. However, the level at which debt metrics for Slovenia will peak is very uncertain and will depend in part on whether the government will need to provide further assistance to the banking system. The level will also depend on the new government's fiscal targets, which are likely to be less ambitious than the previous government's targets, and on the macroeconomic outlook. Risks are skewed negatively and debt levels could exceed 70-75% of GDP after the banking system's issues have been resolved, but are unlikely to reach unsustainable levels. Nevertheless, risks to bondholders have increased and the sovereign's cost of funding is likely to be prone to volatility.

Given the marked deterioration of the government's balance sheet and the sovereign's limited debt tolerance as reflected by its increasing cost of funding, Moody's has changed its assessment of Slovenia's government financial strength, the third factor in Moody's sovereign bond rating methodology, to 'medium' from 'high'. The adjustment to the factor score leads to a change in the sovereign's rating range as indicated by our methodology to Ba1-Ba3 from Baa2-Ba1.

The third key factor leading to the rating action is the uncertain funding environment facing Slovenia, which heightens the risk that the sovereign will require external assistance to meet its financial obligations. Moody's notes that Slovenia's recent efforts to manage the sovereign's liabilities have been relatively successful. The sovereign issued 18-month treasury bills to retire outstanding instruments maturing in June 2013, easing liquidity concerns and decreasing rollover risk. With the treasury bill swap, Moody's estimates that the sovereign now holds enough liquidity to meet its funding needs through the end of the year, excluding a potential capital infusion to the banking sector.

Despite the recent success, the sovereign's cost of funding remains elevated and sensitive to financial market confidence. Slovenia's vulnerability to external shocks, like those brought about by the crisis in Cyprus, could make it difficult for the sovereign to fund itself at sustainable rates, which increases the likelihood that authorities would need to request an external assistance program.

The negative outlook reflects Moody's view that the challenges of the banking system remain substantial. The weak macroeconomic environment amplifies these challenges and increases the possibility of losses to bondholders.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Although unlikely in the near future, a substantial improvement in economic conditions, a more benign funding environment, and stabilization of the banking system without more support being required than what authorities currently expect would lead to a stable outlook.

Slovenia's sovereign rating could be downgraded again in the event that the sovereign experiences a material deterioration in funding conditions; such a deterioration is most likely to result from economic or financial shocks arising from Slovenia's banking sector or from the euro area sovereign debt crisis. A substantial weakening of Slovenia's macroeconomic environment could also jeopardize the stabilization of debt metrics, resulting in a loss of creditworthiness.

CEILINGS

As part of this rating action, Moody's has made the following adjustments to country ceilings for corporate and structured ratings:

Local Currency Bond Ceiling -- Baa2 (from A3)

Local Currency Deposit Ceiling -- Baa2 (from A3)

Foreign Currency Bond Ceiling -- Baa2 (from A3)

Foreign Currency Deposit Ceiling -- Baa2 (from A3)

The lower ceilings reflect the increased risk of events which would, in Moody's view, damage the credit standing of substantially all debt issuers in Slovenia, including severe economic and financial dislocation such as would be expected in the unlikely event of Slovenia leaving the euro area.

The local currency country risk ceiling reflects the maximum credit rating achievable in local currency for a debt issuer domiciled in Slovenia. The foreign currency bond and deposit ceilings are assessed to be in line with the local currency ceilings given that Slovenia uses the euro as its legal tender.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in this rating was "Sovereign Bond Ratings Methodology" published in September 2008. Rating ceilings were set in accordance with "Local Currency Country Risk Ceiling for Bonds and Other Local Currency Obligations" published in March 2013. Please refer to the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for details.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Jaime C. Reusche
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Bart Jan Sebastian Oosterveld
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Moody's Downgrades Slovenia's Sovereign Rating to Ba1 from Baa2, Outlook Negative
No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.