Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
08 Dec 2010
Approximately $18 billion of debt affected
New York, December 08, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service affirmed Dominion Resources' (Dominion)
Baa2 senior unsecured rating and upgraded Virginia Electric and Power
Company's (VEPCO) senior unsecured rating to A3 from Baa1.
Moody's also affirmed the Prime-2 commercial paper ratings
at both Dominion and VEPCO. The rating outlooks for both Dominion
and VEPCO are stable.
Dominion's Baa2 senior unsecured rating is supported by the diversity
of its operations, approximately two-thirds of which are
related to rate-regulated business activities. These regulated
activities are primarily related to the corporate crown jewel, VEPCO,
a vertically integrated electric utility as well as a sizeable natural
gas transmission business and local gas distribution (primarily East Ohio
Gas Company). Dominion is considered to be well positioned within
the Baa2 rating category, given its overall business and operating
risk profile, but also based on our expectation that the company
will produce consolidated financial credit metrics that are still appropriate
for the rating category. These metrics include the ratio of cash
flow before working capital adjustments to debt in the 16% -
18% range and retained cash flow to debt in the low-teen's.
Dominion's rating is only modestly constrained by its more risky non-regulated
merchant generation operations.
The A3 senior unsecured rating for VEPCO primarily reflects the Virginia
and North Carolina regulatory and political environments, which
we believe provide a reasonably supportive and transparent suite of recovery
mechanisms. The rating also reflects our expectations that VEPCO
will produce key financial credit metrics more in the range of the A-rating
category over the near, intermediate and longer-term horizon,
including ratio's of cash flow to debt in the low 20% range
and RCF to debt in the high-teen's.
Moody's acknowledges that, historically, we maintained
a 1-notch ratings differential between VEPCO and Dominion;
however, the two-notch differential between VEPCO's
A3 senior unsecured and Dominion's Baa2 senior unsecured is now
considered to be more appropriate for the following reasons: 1)
the significant amount of parent holding company debt as a percentage
of total consolidated debt, despite the organization structure which
also includes numerous subsidiaries that have no direct debt, but
instead are allocated debt internally via the parent; 2) our expectations
for increasingly stringent environmental mandates, which are likely
to add to the costs and investment requirements for the merchant generation
fleet at Dominion without the benefits of seeking regulatory recovery;
and, 3) the significant challenges facing the approximately 9GW
merchant generation fleet, which includes our expectations for continuing
relatively low natural gas and power prices. As a result of these
merchant generation pressures, Dominion's consolidated financial
profile may decline, albeit modestly over the next few years.
Dominion's stable rating outlook primarily reflects our expectation that
the company will not materially alter its overall business and operating
risk profile but will continue to focus primarily on regulated investment
opportunities. The stable outlook also reflects our expectation
that Dominion will produce key financial credit metrics that are commensurate
with the Baa2 ratings category with a ratio of cash flow from operations
before working capital adjustments to debt in the high teen's range.
VEPCO's stable rating outlook primarily reflects the supportive suite
of recovery mechanisms provided by the Virginia and North Carolina regulatory
commissions as well as the generally supportive political and regulatory
environments that currently exists in those states. The stable
outlook also reflects a continued strong financial credit profile,
where cash flow to debt metrics are expected to remain above 20%
while leverage ratios stay around the 45% range over the next several
VEPCO's rating could be upgraded into the mid-to high-A
ratings category if VEPCO is able to produce a ratio of CFO pre-w/c
to debt above 25% for a sustained period of time. Moody's
already ascribes a material benefit to the VA and NC regulatory environments
which maintain jurisdiction over the majority of VEPCO's rate base.
Nevertheless, should these supportive environments and suite of
recovery mechanisms improve even further, ratings could be upgraded
without a sustained improvement in the financial profile. For Dominion.
a rating upgrade appears unlikely over the near to intermediate-term
horizon, primarily due to our view that Dominion is most likely
going to produce key cash flow to debt metrics in the mid to high teen's
range. Nevertheless, should Dominion produce materially higher
financial credit metrics, for example, where the ratio of
cash flow to debt approximates the low 20% range for a sustained
period of time, then the ratings could be upgraded. Separately,
ratings could also be upgraded without a material increase in the financial
profile should Dominion divest itself of its more risky non-regulated
generation businesses, or embark on similar, corporate risk
VEPCO's ratings could be downgraded back to the Baa-category
if VEPCO's financial profile began to exhibit an unexpected deterioration,
perhaps triggered by an unexpectedly negative regulatory outcome or significant
political intervention in the rate making process. The most likely
scenario to trigger such an event could be the next bi-annual rate
review, where the initial filings are expected in mid-2011,
unless delayed. Nevertheless, we view a more contentious
regulatory environment as highly unlikely at this time. The ratings
could be also downgraded if VEPCO's CFO pre-w/c to debt ratio declined
to the high-teen's range or if its CFO pre-w/c interest
coverage ratio fell below the 4x range for a sustainable period of time
and without any clear path to recovery. A Dominion rating downgrade
also appears unlikely at this time, given Dominion's solid position
within its existing rating category. Nevertheless, a material
weakening of its consolidated financial or liquidity profile (where the
ratio of cash flow to debt fell to the mid to low teen's range for
a sustained period of time), unexpectedly large swings in its collateral
and hedging program that negatively impacts liquidity availability or
an unexpectedly more contentious regulatory environment at VEPCO could
weaken Dominion's credit profile. Absent any mitigating actions
that would address such deterioration, could ultimately result in
a rating downgrade.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Regulated Electric and
Gas Utilities published in August 2009.
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors
Service information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the issuer or obligation satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining
a credit rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Senior Vice President
Infrastructure Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
William L. Hess
MD - Utilities
Infrastructure Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's affirms Dominion's Baa2 senior unsecured; upgrades VEPCO's A3 senior unsecured; outlooks stable
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.