Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
11 Mar 2008
Moody's affirms Financial Security Assurance at Aaa
New York, March 11, 2008 -- Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the Aaa insurance financial strength
ratings of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and its affiliated
insurance operating companies. Moody's has also affirmed the Aa2
senior unsecured ratings of parent company, Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd. These rating affirmations reflect Moody's assessment
of FSA's strong capital position despite some deterioration in its HELOC
book, as well as the firm's strengthened market position.
The rating outlook remains stable.
OVERVIEW OF RATING APPROACH
As outlined in Moody's Rating Methodology for Financial Guarantors,
we have evaluated FSA along five key rating factors: 1) franchise
value and strategy, 2) insurance portfolio characteristics,
3) capital adequacy, 4) profitability, and 5) financial flexibility.
Of these factors, capital adequacy is given particular emphasis.
To estimate capital adequacy, Moody's has applied its traditional
portfolio risk model for determining stress losses on the non-mortgage
related portion of FSA's insured portfolio and alternative stress tests
for the mortgage and mortgage-related CDO exposure. For
mortgage-related exposures, stress losses were estimated
using assumptions consistent with a scenario where 2006 subprime first
lien mortgages realize an average of 21% cumulative pool losses,
with other vintages and products stressed accordingly. Stress-level
losses for RMBS transactions were assessed on a transaction-by-transaction
Losses estimated under the approach described above were present valued
to reflect estimates of the payout pattern that would emerge, based
on the collateral type. These factors resulted in aggregate present
value discounts to principal loss estimates of approximately 8%
for RMBS. (FSA's two ABS CDO exposures did not generate any
loss under Moody's 21% stress scenario.) Non mortgage
risks are discounted within the portfolio model based on estimates of
payout patterns as well.
In comparing estimated stress losses to claims paying resources and associated
rating levels, Moody's combines an estimated loss distribution for
mortgage risks with one for non-mortgage risks, assuming
a correlation between the two that ranges from 90% (for Aaa) down
to 30% (for Baa3). Claims paying resources are then compared
to the indicated capital need, at the target benchmark (1.3x
capital needed to cover stress-case losses).
KEY RATING FACTORS -- CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Based on the risks in FSA's portfolio, as assessed by Moody's according
to the approach outlined above, estimated stress-case losses
would be in the range of $4.5 billion, including approximately
$1.1 billion from its mortgage exposures, with home
equity lines of credit (HELOC) being the main contributor. This
compares to Moody's estimate of FSA's claims paying resources of approximately
$6.5 billion, resulting in a total capital ratio of
over 1.4x, which exceeds the 1.3x Aaa "target" level.
Moody's further noted that in the most likely or "expected" scenario,
FSA's insured portfolio will incur lifetime losses of approximately $1.2
billion in present value terms, and that FSA's current claims-paying
resources cover this expected loss estimate by over 5x.
In February 2008, FSA received a $500 million capital injection
from its parent, the Dexia Group, to shore up the guarantor's
financial resources, helping the firm maintain capital resources
above Moody's "target" total capital ratio at a time
of high underwriting growth for the firm and greater credit uncertainty.
KEY RATING FACTORS -- BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL PROFILE
In Moody's opinion, the current level of stress in the market has
benefited FSA's business prospects relative to many of its peers,
who have experienced a decline in market share in light of credit concerns
over large ABS CDO and mortgage exposures. FSA has been able to
take advantage of the current environment by generating high quality business
at historically strong premium rates. FSA's broad and deep relationships
with issuers, as well as its prominent market position and execution
capabilities in several market sectors, provide the company with
a solid foundation from which to capitalize on today's market conditions.
The rating agency added that FSA's large underwriting volume is
also an important indicator of the perceived value of financial guaranty
insurance by the capital markets more generally. Financial guarantors
perform a valued credit and underwriting intermediation function that
has translated into improved market pricing and liquidity for the insured
securities. Moody's believes, however, that FSA's
current competitive strength is likely to weaken somewhat as financial
market conditions normalize and as certain other guarantors gain or regain
With respect to underwriting and risk management, Moody's believes
that FSA's conservative underwriting strategy has resulted in a generally
high-quality and well-diversified insurance portfolio,
but that single risk and sectoral concentrations such as those evidenced
by the company's second lien mortgage portfolio will need to be
monitored closely going forward.
Moody's added that, while FSA's ABS CDO exposure is
modest, the company has approximately $80 billion of exposure
to pooled corporate debt obligations (CDOs). The majority of this
exposure is in synthetic form, with the rest being CLOs and to a
smaller extent mostly older vintage CBOs. The rating agency believes
that the risks presented by such exposures are manageable by FSA given
the conservative underwriting strategy of the firm, with all deals
originated since 2003 being Aaa at origination or attaching above Aaa
subordination levels in the case of synthetic transactions.
Moody's also believes that the company's non-core asset management
activities, including GICs, place incremental negative pressure
on its ratings. The rating agency noted that FSA had to correct
a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting of hedging
transactions in 2005, and that it recently received a Wells Notice
from the SEC. The SEC staff is considering recommending a civil
injunctive action and/or administrative proceedings against FSA,
alleging violations of some anti-fraud provisions of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities Act of 1933. This action by
the SEC follows a lengthy investigation of practices in the municipal
GIC market. FSA, along with other financial institutions,
received a subpoena from the SEC in November 2006. The U.S.
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York has also been
pursuing a criminal investigation into these matters. Moody's
will continue to follow the situation for material developments.
FSA's near term profitability is expected to be somewhat volatile,
as new business production is likely to remain strong for some time and
as possible additional credit losses are realized. However,
some earnings stability is provided by the company's large in-force
portfolio, which will continue to provide significant premium revenue
In terms of financial flexibility, FSA, like other financial
guarantors, benefits from its ability to pay claims over an extended
period of time, typically scheduled interest and principal at maturity.
Moody's said that FSA's ownership by Dexia is considered to be a
strength, as evidenced by its capacity and willingness to provide
FSA with additional funding at a time when some publicly traded guarantors
were struggling to raise capital in very challenging market conditions.
Moody's believes that holding company liquidity is adequate, supported
by dividend capacity from Financial Security Assurance Inc.
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. is the main operating
company of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. (FSA Holdings,
Aa2 senior debt rating) and the parent of other wholly-owned financial
guaranty insurers in a stacked structure. FSA Holdings is a subsidiary
of Dexia Credit Local (senior debt at Aa1, BFSR at B+),
which is the largest operating company within the Dexia Banking Group.
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
Senior Vice President
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.