Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
20 Apr 2011
London, 20 April 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service has today affirmed Iceland's Baa3 local
and foreign currency government bond ratings and their negative outlook,
as well as the Prime-3 rating for the country's short-term
Today's announcement comes despite the recent majority "no"
vote in the country's referendum on the revised Icesave agreement,
which Moody's had previously said (February 2011) would most likely
result in a negative rating action. However, today's
affirmation of the rating recognizes the following developments that led
Moody's to reach a more benign assessment of the referendum outcome:
(1) Despite the rejection of the revised agreement to resolve the dispute
over the Icesave offshore bank deposit scheme, the British and Dutch
governments are now expected to receive initial payments from the Landsbanki
estate soon for the costs they incurred in covering their citizens'
Icesave deposits. In addition, the Landsbanki estate now
expects to be able to make significantly higher payments to priority claimholders
as asset recoveries have been much higher than expected earlier.
The outstanding Icesave obligation and potential liability to the government
might therefore be reduced significantly in the coming months regardless
of the referendum outcome.
(2) Moody's also expects Iceland's programme of support from
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to remain on track. The fifth
review was scheduled for 27th April and there will certainly be a delay
while the IMF assesses the implications of the referendum outcome.
However, it seems unlikely that there will be a significant delay
or blockage of the programme as occurred in 2009.
(3) Public statements indicate that the Nordic governments will likely
continue to provide funding to the Icelandic authorities under their loan
agreements. Apart from the IMF, the Nordic governments'
financing has been an essential external funding source for the Icelandic
The outlook on the rating remains negative given the ongoing uncertainty.
Moody's understands that the underlying issue of whether the Icelandic
government has a liability under the EU directive on deposit-guarantee
schemes will now most likely be resolved through the court of the European
Free Trade Association (EFTA). This legal process may take at least
a year. There are also uncertainties regarding the timetable for
the relaxation of the capital controls and the economic outlook,
in particular related to investment.
RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMATION OF CURRENT RATING
The primary driver of today's affirmation of Iceland's ratings
is Moody's recognition that the size and importance of the government's
liability related to the Icesave dispute will likely decline substantially
in the coming months. This is because the Landsbanki Resolution
Committee now estimates that asset recoveries will ultimately amount to
approximately 90% of priority deposit claims, which is significantly
higher than earlier estimates. The Resolution Committee is expected
to start paying out to priority claimants (such as the UK and Netherlands
governments) after the summer. Given the substantial cash reserves
that the estate has accumulated, the potential liability to the
government (if found liable) might well have declined to less than half
by the time the legal process has run its course. However,
Moody's continues to view the full resolution of the Icesave issue
-- most likely through further legal proceedings -- to be an
important pre-requisite for normalizing Iceland's relations
with the international investor community.
The second driver underlying the rating affirmation is Moody's expectation
that the IMF programme will not undergo any material changes and remain
on track, despite a short delay while the IMF re-assesses
its macroeconomic framework. Overall, Moody's considers
the IMF programme to be a crucial anchor for Iceland's economic
and financial recovery, especially in terms of the ongoing fiscal
consolidation. A related third driver is the rating agency's
expectation that the Nordic governments will also continue to provide
funding to Iceland under their loan agreements (EUR888 million still available).
The deadline for draw-downs has recently been extended until December
These drivers address Moody's previous concerns that a possible
rejection of the Icesave agreement might put the external funding from
the Nordics (and consequently the IMF) at risk, thereby undermining
Iceland's economic recovery, fiscal sustainability and the
ability of the Icelandic authorities to relax the strict capital controls
that are in place.
Additionally, Moody's notes that the government recently announced
a buyback offer at par for all holders of the two Eurobonds maturing in
December 2011 and April 2012. The government has already bought
back a significant amount of these bonds but approximately EUR800 million
worth remain outstanding. The May 5 auction will provide a good
indication of the sentiment of non-resident investors towards Iceland
and will probably influence the timing of the first steps to relax capital
RATIONALE FOR MAINTAINING A NEGATIVE OUTLOOK
Moody's notes that there are still significant risks that warrant
maintaining a negative outlook on the rating. While the size of
the Icesave liability will shrink, the government could still be
found liable for accrued interest and any uncovered portion of the principal,
the amount of which is unclear at this point in time. Litigation
risks relating to the Emergency Act and the priority status of deposits
claims are another source of uncertainty, but Moody's expects
these lawsuits to be resolved in the coming months.
Moreover, the risks to Iceland's economic recovery are significant.
In particular, Moody's believes that the economy might be
negatively affected due to lower capital inflows because of possible delays
to the liberalization of the strict capital controls that are currently
in place. The positive GDP growth, which Moody's expects
Iceland to record in 2011, relies mainly on a strong rebound in
investment -- but this may not materialize if foreign investors delay
investment decisions, pending a full resolution of the Icesave issue.
A longer-term question is whether the rejection of the Icesave
agreement will have more fundamental implications for the outlook for
FDI and the attractiveness of Iceland as a place of doing business.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN
Moody's would downgrade Iceland's rating if the above-mentioned
legal risks related to the priority status of deposits were to materialize.
This would result in a much higher liability for the government because
of lower payouts from the Landsbanki estate to the British and Dutch governments.
The rating would also come under downward pressure if Nordic funding was
disrupted against our expectations or the economic recovery turns out
to be slower than Moody's is expecting, possibly due to delays
to important investment projects or slower-than-expected
corporate and household debt restructuring. Indications of a declining
commitment to fiscal consolidation would also be negative for the rating.
The speed and sequencing of capital account liberalization will become
a more important ratings driver going forward, and Moody's
will closely monitor the impact of the steps the Icelandic government
will take on the exchange rate.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP
Moody's would consider returning the rating outlook to stable and
potentially upgrading the ratings if the economy were to recover much
faster than is currently expected and if the foreign exchange rate were
to remain stable following the gradual relaxation of capital controls.
PREVIOUS RATING ACTION AND METHODOLOGY
Moody's last rating action affecting Iceland was implemented on
29 July 2010, when the rating agency assigned a negative outlook
to Iceland's Baa3 rating. The rating action prior to that
was taken on 23 April 2010, when the rating agency returned the
outlook on the Baa3 rating to stable from negative.
The principal methodology used in rating the government of Iceland is
Moody's "Sovereign Bond Methodology", published in 2008.
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
MD - Sovereign Risk
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
Moody's affirms Iceland's Baa3/P-3 ratings and maintains negative outlook
One Canada Square
London E14 5FA
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.