Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Você está prestes a deixar o site local do Brasil e será direcionado ao site global. Deseja continuar?
Não exibir esta mensagem novamente
Sim
Não
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Email page
Email
print page
Print

Rating Action:

Moody’s affirms MS Amlin entities’ IFS ratings at A1; outlook stable

13 January 2020

London, January 13, 2020 – Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today affirmed the A1 insurance financial strength ratings (IFSR) of MS Amlin AG and Lloyd's Syndicate 2001, key operating subsidiaries of Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company, Limited's (MSI, A1 stable for IFSR) international division, and previously subsidiaries of MS Amlin plc. The outlook for both entities is stable.

This rating action follows the reorganisation of MSI's international divisions, including the MS Amlin entities, effective from 1 January 2020, whereby the MS Amlin entities are directly owned by MSI and MS Amlin plc no longer exists as the regional holding company.

The MS Amlin entities have been wholly-owned subsidiaries of MSI, a subsidiary of MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. group ("MS&AD") since its acquisition of MS Amlin plc in February 2016.

A list of affected ratings can be found at the end of this press release.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The A1 IFSRs assigned to both MS Amlin AG and Lloyds Syndicate 2001, collectively the "MS Amlin entities" reflect their A3 standalone credit profiles and two notches of uplift due to parental support.

Following the reorganisation of MSI's international divisions, Moody's has altered its analytic approach to separately evaluate the standalone credit assessment of each the MS Amlin entities. As a result, the standalone credit assessments for MS Amlin AG and Lloyd's Syndicate 2001 have been reduced to A3 from A2, while the extent of rating uplift due to parental support has increased to two notches from one notch previously, reflecting the entities' tighter integration with MSI.

Any reversal of this tighter integration or diminished strategic importance to MSI, including indications of MSI seeking to sell one or more of the entities would lead to downward pressure on the ratings.

-PARENTAL SUPPORT--

Moody's believes that the MS Amlin entities benefit from strong parental support from MSI because they are a key component of MSI's strategy to grow and diversify outside its domestic Japanese market. Support is further underscored by the shared brand and increasing operational integration and reputational ties between the MS Amlin entities and the parent, along with demonstration of financial support in the form of an additional capital injection in 2018.

The reorganization of MSI's holdings in the MS Amlin entities increases the direct linkage between the individual MS Amlin entities and MSI, which is in line with MSI's intention to more closely align these entities with its overall strategy and to foster more collaboration. The reorganization should also support the implementation of MS Amlin's new underwriting strategy to focus on its three core markets of reinsurance, global specialty, and domestic specialty markets in continental Europe. As a result, Moody's expects the MS Amlin entities to align themselves more closely with the broader MSI operations as opposed to their previous focus on operating as a cohesive MS Amlin franchise.

More broadly, MS&AD has a strategic goal of growing its domestic life and international business to reach initially more than 50% of group adjusted profit by the end of March 2022 and growing its international business solely to reach 50% in the long term. The MS Amlin entities are collectively MS&AD's largest international business and account for approximately 13% of MS&AD's non-life insurance net premiums written. Furthermore, the MS Amlin entities' expertise in specialty and casualty commercial lines should enable MS&AD to expand within its domestic property and casualty market even as traditional consumer lines, such as auto insurance, will likely shrink.

-- STANDALONE CREDIT FUNDAMENTALS --

MS AMLIN AG

MS Amlin AG's standalone credit profile reflects its good product and geographic diversification, solid economic and regulatory capitalisation, conservative investment strategy and good profitability on a through-the-cycle basis. These strengths are offset by its modest standalone market position amongst global reinsurance peers and the inherent volatility and cyclicality in some of its lines of business, including high exposure to natural catastrophe perils.

MS Amlin AG's business is diversified across property and casualty reinsurance lines, albeit that the majority of its exposure it to property. Approximately half of its business is written in the UK and Europe, with the remainder spread between North America (about 30%) and the rest of the world (about 20%). While its business is relatively well diversified, it is concentrated within a smaller number of product lines and geographies than some of its larger reinsurance peers.

The company's capitalisation is good, with regulatory capitalisation based on the Swiss Solvency Test (SST) of 178% at year-end 2018 and Moody's gross underwriting leverage (GUL) of 2.5x. Over time, we expect that MS Amlin AG's standalone capitalisation might drift lower as it becomes more integrated into the MSI group, although we expect regulatory capital to remain comfortably above required levels. Good capital adequacy is supported by MS Amlin AG's conservative investment strategy, focused on a diversified portfolio of high quality investments.

MS Amlin AG's profitability has been good on a through the cycle basis, and the underwriting losses it incurred during 2017 were broadly in line with peers, which also experienced elevated losses due to above-average natural catastrophe events. Over the past five years, the company's average return on capital (ROC) was 5.6%. Going forward, we expect rising prices for reinsurance and underwriting actions taken by the company to result in improved underwriting profitability.

On a standalone basis, MS Amlin AG's market position is modest relative to other reinsurers, with gross premium written of CHF 1.3 billion in 2018, although company's association with the MS Amlin brand, and ownership by MSI enhance its market position, relative to other reinsurers of similar size.

LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2001

Lloyd's Syndicate 2001's standalone credit profile reflects its strong franchise as the second largest Lloyd's syndicate, good product and geographic diversification and conservative investment strategy. These strengths are offset by weak profitability in recent years, modest excess capital on a standalone basis and the inherent volatility and cyclicality in some of its lines of business, including high exposure to natural catastrophe risks.

The syndicate has a strong market position within Lloyd's, as the second largest Lloyd's syndicate, and long-established reputation for underwriting expertise and client service. On a pure standalone basis, it lacks the diverse set of platforms provided by similarly-sized (re)insurance peers, although being part of the broader MSI group is an offset to this. The syndicate is well diversified by product and geography, with a good spread of business across property and specialty insurance and reinsurance lines, and global diversification.

The syndicate benefits from a conservative investment strategy, focused on a diversified portfolio of high quality investments, the majority of which are fixed income instruments.

More negatively, the syndicate has demonstrated weak underwriting results in 2017, and to a lesser extent, 2018, as a result of its elevated natural catastrophe exposure, and above average levels of severe weather events in those years, in addition to elevated man-made losses in certain casualty and specialty lines. The syndicate reported ROC of negative 15.6% and negative 79.8% in 2018 and 2017, respectively. While the syndicate, along with the Lloyd's in general, has taken actions to improve its underwriting performance, including discontinuing unprofitable lines, Moody's believes that the syndicate remains exposed to volatility and cyclicality in a number of its lines of business, including still high exposure to natural catastrophes perils.

Further, the syndicate's ex-cat underlying profitability has been under pressure from soft pricing for specialty insurance and reinsurance and the impact of low interest rates on investment income. While these pressures persist, prices are improving across many lines of insurance as markets respond to elevated catastrophe losses and pressure on casualty reserves. Looking ahead, we expect the syndicate to benefit from the increasing momentum behind price increases.

The syndicate's standalone excess capital is modest, relative to its exposures and Lloyd's capital requirements. This is highlighted by material cash calls made on members of £200 million and £527 million for the 2018 and 2017 underwriting years, respectively, to recapitalize the syndicate. In addition, the syndicate's GUL metric is weak, at 7x, albeit improving from 8.6x at year-end 2017. We expect the syndicate's capitalisation to improve modestly as underwriting profitability is restored, but do not expect MSI to allow significant excess capital to build up. Modest excess capitalisation on a standalone basis is offset by support from its parent, MSI, and failing that support from the Lloyd's central fund.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATINGS UP / DOWN

Given that the ratings of MS Amlin AG and Lloyd's Syndicate 2001 benefit from support from their parent, any upward pressure on their ratings would be dependent on an upgrade of MSI's ratings. However, the following factors could lead to upward pressure on the entities' respective standalone credit assessments.

MS Amlin AG: (i) a meaningful increase in MS Amlin AG's market position and standalone franchise strength, (ii) sustaining strong core earnings with return on capital above 10% over the underwriting cycle; and (iii) sustained strong standalone capitalisation, with a SST ratio remaining above 160%.

Lloyd's Syndicate 2001: (i) Improved profitability, with return on capital above 10% over the underwriting cycle and a combined ratio sustainably below 95%, (ii) enhanced standalone capital adequacy including maintaining gross underwriting leverage at a level below 3.0x.

Conversely, Moody's said the following factors could lead to downward pressure on the MS Amlin entities' ratings: (i) deterioration in the credit profile of its parent, MSI, or indications of diminished support from MSI, (ii) a reduction in shareholders' equity in excess of 10% over a rolling 12 month period (including special dividends), (iii) sustained weakness in underwriting profitability with combined ratios consistently in excess of 97%, and (iv) a material increase in catastrophe exposure or general risk appetite.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS -

The following ratings have been affirmed:

Lloyd's Syndicate 2001:

…Insurance financial strength rating at A1

Outlook remains stable

MS Amlin AG

…Insurance financial strength rating at A1

Outlook remains stable

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Reinsurers Methodology published in November 2019. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Brandan Holmes
VP-Sr Credit Officer
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS : 44 20 7772 5456
Client Service : 44 20 7772 5454

Simon Ainsworth
Associate Managing Director
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS : 44 20 7772 5456
Client Service : 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office :
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London, E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS : 44 20 7772 5456
Client Service : 44 20 7772 5454

© 2020 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND/OR ITS CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and Moody’s investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.