Gallery has $60 million of rated debt
New York, October 03, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Nelson Gallery Foundation's ("NGF"
or "the gallery") Aa3 issuer rating and Aaa/VMIG 1 Series 2004A bonds
issued through the Missouri Development Finance Board. The 2004A
bonds are supported by a Donation Agreement with the Hall Family Foundation
(rated Aaa/stable), which ensures that timely debt service payments
are made to investors.
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
The Aa3 issuer rating reflects Nelson Gallery Foundation's healthy operating
cash flow margins, support from the Hall Family Foundation for debt
service on the Series 2004A bonds, prudent debt and expense management,
strong liquidity and, our expectation that the gallery will see
future fundraising success. The rating also incorporates the gallery's
high reliance on endowment and gifts for operating support, very
high operating leverage, and the need to maintain operations to
cover higher debt service payments in the near term given recent debt
service restructure.
The Aaa rating reflects Moody's approach to rating jointly supported transactions
and is based on the Nelson Gallery Foundation (Aa3) and the Hall Family
Foundation (Aaa)'s credit fundamentals as well as the Donation Agreement.
The rating outlook is stable.
The VMIG 1 short-term rating is based on a Standby Bond Purchase
Agreement (SBPA) from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (rated
Aa3/P-1) that expires on May 24, 2013.
STRENGTHS
*Well-established regional market position as a leading cultural
institution in the Midwest, located in Kansas City, Missouri.
In FY 2012, NGF had 418,922 total visitors, up from
370,527 the prior fiscal year. NGF is focused on expanding
its membership and geographic reach. Total membership was 11,853
in FY 2012, a nearly 11% increase over the prior year.
*Large financial resource base. Total cash and investments
were $382 million in FY 2012, though down 13% from
the prior year due to a payoff of $40 million of debt and a negative
0% investment return in FY 2012 (ends 4/30/2012).
*Robust liquidity with $263 million in monthly liquidity,
providing 220% coverage of $120 million of demand debt in
FY 2012 and superb coverage of operations. Unrestricted financial
resources were a strong 56% of total financial resources in FY
2012.
*Excellent operating cash flow margins, at 30% in FY
2012. Management has the flexibility to reduce expenses,
as demonstrated by expense cuts made during the recession (primarily in
FY 2010).
*Donation agreement from the Hall Family Foundation (HFF), which
unconditionally obligates the Hall Family Foundation to pay interest and
principal on $60 million of the Gallery's outstanding variable
rate debt.
*Prudent debt management, evidenced by a pay-down of
$40 million of debt in FY 2012 and the Series 2012A bonds (issued
August 2012) that involved restructuring $48 million of variable
rate debt to fixed rate mode and smoothing debt service. To date
60% of the gallery's debt is in variable rate mode.
The gallery does not have any plans for additional debt issuance.
CHALLENGES:
*High leverage for non-profit institution in the Aa3 category
with expendable financial resources providing only 1.48 times debt
coverage in FY 2012, well below the FY 2010 median of 3.3
times for non-profits rated Aa3. Excluding the $60
million Series 2004A that are paid by the HFF, then expendable financial
resources cover debt by a stronger 2.13 times.
*Heavy dependence on investment income and gift revenue, representing
52% and 25% of total operating revenue respectively in FY
2012, exposes the gallery to volatility in investment markets and
the macro- economy.
*Given the amortization of the Series 2012A bonds, the gallery
will have higher debt service payments from 2013 to 2025, and therefore
it will be necessary to maintain satisfactory operating performance to
cover these increased payments. Current operations in FY 2012 provide
only 0.59 coverage of MADS (1.2 times coverage in FY 2011
when there was higher gift revenue), calculated as maximum annual
debt service of all amortizing bonds excluding the Series 2004A,
plus 8% of the $60 million Series 2008A bonds.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the Nelson Gallery
Foundation will continue to boost its balance sheet coverage of debt and
its operations through strong philanthropic support, and maintain
operations sufficient to cover debt service, as well as the fact
that there are no additional borrowing plans.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP
Unlikely at this time given high leverage. Marked growth in financial
resources combined with a strengthened market position as demonstrated
by growth of visitorship/membership revenue and increased philanthropic
support.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN
Failure to maintain operating cash flow margins that cover the higher
debt service now coming on line; declines in financial resources;
continued low fundraising support for operations or weak investment returns
leading to poor operating margins; increased debt without commensurate
balance sheet and revenue growth.
RATING METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in this rating was Moody's Rating Approach
for Not-for-Profit Cultural Institutions published in November
2004. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com
for a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued
by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's
Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf,
London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Investors Service's information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated
entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing
a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it
uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not
an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate
information received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating
Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on
the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and
recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on
which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's
ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is
the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available
to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has
issued the rating.
Emily Schwarz
Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Eva Bogaty
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Public Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's affirms Nelson Gallery Foundation's (MO) Aa3 issuer rating and Aaa/VMIG1 rating on Series 2004A bonds; outlook is stable