Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's affirms Solomon Islands' B3 issuer rating; maintains stable outlook

Global Credit Research - 10 Oct 2017

Singapore, October 10, 2017 -- Moody's Investors Service has today affirmed the Government of Solomon Islands' local and foreign currency issuer ratings at B3 and maintained the stable outlook.

The factors supporting the rating affirmation and stable outlook are Moody's expectation that:

(1) Technical and financial support from donors and international financial institutions and adherence to the Solomon Islands' fiscal management framework will continue to drive high fiscal strength

(2) Very weak shock absorption capacity given low incomes, narrow economic diversification and weak institutions will remain key credit constraints

In addition, the economy and public finances will remain highly vulnerable to both sudden climate events and gradual climate change trends.

The local-currency bond and deposit ceilings are unchanged at B2. The foreign currency bond ceiling is unchanged at B2 and the foreign currency deposit ceiling is also unchanged at Caa1. In addition, the short-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings are "Not Prime.''

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR RATING AFFIRMATION AT B3

TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT WITH ADHERENCE TO FISCAL FRAMEWORK TO CONTINUE DRIVING HIGH FISCAL STRENGTH

We expect the Solomon Islands' credit profile to continue to be supported by a very low government debt burden and high debt affordability.

Government debt, which we estimate to reach 10% of GDP in 2017, is one of the lowest among the sovereigns that Moody's rates. Debt relief by key creditors significantly reduced the debt burden in 2004. Adherence to legislation that sets a ceiling on the debt to GDP ratio and precludes the use of borrowing to fund recurrent expenditure has maintained debt at very low levels since then.

We expect government debt to increase slightly to around 12% of GDP by the end of 2018, still very low relative to other B-rated sovereigns and, more generally, all rated sovereigns.

Although the government's cash balance has fallen to low levels this year, as revenues have come in below expectations, we expect the government to maintain its ongoing commitment to ensuring robust public finances. Solomon Islands' successful graduation from an IMF program in 2016 has helped strengthen fiscal management through the Public Financial Management Act, the introduction of a multiyear budget framework and enhancements to debt management.

The recently launched tax review, which includes examining the consumption tax, sales tax, income tax and other taxes such as gambling tax, would raise prospects for government revenue receipts if successfully implemented. At this stage and given the likely implementation lags and potential narrowing of the scope of the fiscal reforms, we do not factor a significant broadening of the tax base in our projections.

Larger borrowing to fund key development projects such as the Tina River Hydro project will be done on concessional terms and include grants. We also expect Australia (Aaa stable) to continue to provide aid to Solomon Islands, which will help to maintain the sovereign's low borrowing needs and high debt affordability. Overall, interest payments on government debt will remain below 0.5% of government revenues, a very low level compared to other rated sovereigns.

Beside financial assistance, Australia provides technical support that contributes to the smooth functioning of the Solomon Islands' government institutions. Technical advisors are seconded to help strengthen the Solomon Islands' capacity to undertake core state functions.

Although an escalation of domestic political and social tensions could have a high credit impact by threatening the continuity of donor support and hampering the effectiveness of policies and economic growth, we think it is a low probability risk. There has been some progress on restoring law and order in the past decade through the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI), which we expect to persist.

We expect Australia's technical and financial engagement with Solomon Islands to continue following the conclusion of RAMSI. Australia will continue to provide development support for justice and governance, education, health and police development through its bilateral aid investment program. Australia provides about 70% of Solomon Islands' total aid, equal to around 28% of the government's revenue or 12% GDP. The signing of a security treaty in August 2017 underscores the continued engagement on security issues between the two countries.

LOW INCOMES, NARROW ECONOMIC BASE AND WEAK INSTITUTIONS CONSTRAIN SHOCK ABSORPTION CAPACITY

Solomon Islands' very small economy (nominal GDP of $1.1 billion in 2016) offers limited scope for diversification of economic activity and leaves the sovereign highly vulnerable to credit negative shocks. Such potential shocks include Solomon Islands' exposure to climate change, which poses significant economic and fiscal risks.

At the same time, resilience is low on account of the country's low level of development, reflected in very low incomes, low quality of infrastructure and weak institutions. These characteristics are somewhat mitigated by low government debt levels that provide room for expansionary fiscal policy, if necessary, and the potential for physical assistance and financial support from international partners.

The economic base is narrow, reliant on agricultural and forestry production for around 30% of GDP. The economy's dependence on forestry resources -- which are depleting at a sustained pace -- and goods exports to China -- which account for a sizeable 26% of GDP -- raise the sovereign's susceptibility to sector and market -specific shocks.

The Medium-Term Development Strategy 2016-2035 aims to bolster the economy's resilience through new sources of growth and revenues, though the effectiveness of these measures has yet to be revealed.

Constraints on access to finance are a hurdle to strengthening economic output. Although banks are adequately capitalised, highly liquid and profitable, a potential further reduction in correspondent banking services could hinder the flow of credit to trade and investment sectors.

Incomes, with GDP per capita around $2,000 in 2016 at purchasing power parity, are very low relative to other B-rated sovereigns, despite more than doubling over the past decade.

Furthermore, most economic and policy institutions are nascent. Solomon Islands' rankings on Worldwide Governance Indicators, particularly government effectiveness and the rule of law, are low. Perceptions of corruption have the potential to hinder the implementation of key investment projects and stymie progress on economic development. Lack of transparency on parts of government funding and spending weighs on the operation of and reporting of the budget, particularly given the emphasis donors have placed on adherence to fiscal reforms.

More generally, the country's very small size constrains the effectiveness of institutions by subjecting Solomon Islands to factors beyond the control of domestic policymakers.

RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable outlook indicates risks to Solomon Islands rating are balanced.

On the upside, the successful development of the Tina River Hydro project and Oceanic Cable project could boost potential growth by increasing domestic electricity supply and internet connectivity, allowing the development of some new sectors of economic activity. In addition, the potential for gold production to resume at the Gold Ridge Mine in 2019 would boost mining activity. At this stage, there are significant challenges to the timely and effective implementation of these projects, such as land rights and geopolitical issues.

On the downside, the economy's growth potential could weaken materially in particular if the structural decline in the logging industry, weak competitiveness and low quality infrastructure hinder investment more significantly than we currently assume. In turn, a prolonged economic slowdown or sudden negative economic shock, combined with lower donor funding and depleting government's cash reserves, would undermine fiscal strength.

Moreover, a deterioration in the bilateral relationship with Australia or in the country's engagement with multilateral development partners would undermine high fiscal strength given the prominent role of aid and concessional financing and hinder fiscal management through lower institutional capacity.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP

Upward rating pressures could develop as a result of 1) steady diversification of the economy away from the logging sector; or 2) significant strengthening in institutional capacity.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN

Downward rating triggers could stem from 1) a reversal in fiscal discipline and debt consolidation, reflected in a further lasting erosion in government cash reserves and potentially stemming from sharp cuts in aid from donors; or 2) a worsening political environment that hinders policymaking and leads to lower financial and technical support from international partners, or 3) a deterioration in the external balance sheet that would result in depleting foreign exchange reserves and raise balance of payments risks.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 1,981 (2016 Estimate) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 3.2% (2016 Estimate) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): -3% (2016 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -3.1% (2016 Estimate) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -4.6% (2016 Estimate) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 25.7% (2016 Estimate)

Level of economic development: Very Low level of economic resilience

Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.

On 5 October 2017, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Solomon Islands, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's institutional strength/ framework, have not materially changed. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially increased. The issuer's susceptibility to event risks have decreased.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Matthew Circosta
Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077

Atsi Sheth
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.