Global Header | Moody's
Close
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Terms of One-Time Website Use

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Rating Action:

Moody's affirms ratings of 10 Qatari banks; changes outlook to negative from stable on nine banks

05 Jul 2017

Limassol, July 05, 2017 -- Moody's Investors Service, ("Moody's") has today affirmed the long-term ratings of all of the 10 banks it rates in Qatar. Moody's also affirmed the banks' baseline credit assessments (BCA), adjusted BCAs and Counterparty Risk Assessments (CRA)s. At the same time, the rating agency changed the outlook to negative from stable for nine banks and maintained the negative outlook on one bank.

The rating actions were driven by 1) the weakening domestic operating environment, particularly for banking funding, resulting in the rating agency lowering the Macro Profile it assigns to Qatar to Moderate+ from Strong--; and 2) the weakening capacity of the Qatar government to support the country's banks, as indicated by Moody's change in outlook for the Qatari government's Aa3 government bond rating to negative from stable on July 04 (for details please refer to the press release: https://www.moodys.com/research/--PR_368471).

Details of the rationales for individual bank rating actions are provided later in this press release.

Please click on this link http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_196398 for the List of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this Press Release and provides, for each of the credit ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the following items:

• Principal Methodology

• Local Market Analyst

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATING AFFIRMATIONS

Moody's decision to affirm the ratings of all 10 banks reflects the resilience in their financial performance underpinned by continued strong asset quality and capital buffers. Despite challenges emerging from the ongoing dispute between Qatar and a group of peer countries, including its fellow Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) neighbors Bahrain (Ba2 negative), Saudi Arabia (A1 stable) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE, Aa2 stable) the banks' liquidity buffers remain solid.

OUTLOOK CHANGED TO NEGATIVE

At the same time, Moody's decision to change the outlook to negative from stable on the long-term ratings of nine banks reflects Moody's expectations that a prolongation of the current dispute could lead to some outflows of external funding, which would reduce the banks' liquidity buffers while domestic funding sources remain tight due to current oil prices. At the same time, Moody's expects funding costs to rise, dampening banks' profitability. Additionally, the negative outlook also captures the weakening capacity of the government of Qatar to provide support in case of need, as implied by the negative outlook on the Aa3 government bond rating.

The affected institutions are Qatar National Bank (Q.P.S.C.), Doha Bank Q.S.C., Al Khalij Commercial Bank (al khaliji) P.Q.S.C., Ahli Bank Q.S.C., Barwa Bank Q.S.C., International Bank of Qatar (Q.S.C.), Masraf Al Rayan (Q.S.C.), Qatar International Islamic Bank (Q.S.C.) and Qatar Islamic Bank Q.P.S.C..

MAINTAINED NEGATIVE OUTLOOK

Moody's has maintained the negative outlook on the long-term deposit ratings of The Commercial Bank (P.S.Q.C.) ('Commercial Bank'). The existing negative outlook was driven by Moody's expectation of pressures on the bank's solvency, arising from asset quality deterioration and the weakening of profitability owing to higher loan loss charges and a lower contribution from Commercial Bank's Turkish subsidiary and UAE based associate. Additional pressure is now exerted on the bank's ratings due to the challenges in the operating environment and the negative outlook for the Qatar government rating, similarly to the other Qatari banks rated by Moody's.

WEAKENING DOMESTIC OPERATING ENVIRONMENT AFFECTING STANDALONE CREDIT PROFILES

A key driver of the negative outlook of the Qatari banks' ratings is the downside risk that a prolongation of the current regional dispute could trigger some outflows of external funding (which represents around 36% of total banking system liabilities as of May 2017) and a generalized increase in the cost of funding. As a result, the banks' liquidity buffers would likely reduce, as domestic funding sources remain tight due to current oil prices. This could negatively impact the supply of credit and weaken economic growth. Consequently, this could increase asset quality pressures and provisioning charges on the banks over the coming quarters. A combination of these factors, could result in lower profits for Qatari banks. Moody's has captured these risks by lowering its macro profile for Qatar to Moderate+ from Strong-.

WEAKENING GOVERNMENT CREDITWORTHINESS AFFECTS CAPACITY TO SUPPORT

Although Moody's continues to incorporate a very high probability of government support for the long-term issuer and deposit ratings of the Qatari banks, the change in their outlook is also driven by the change in outlook to negative from stable on the Aa3 Qatar government bond rating. This reflects the potential weakening of the government's capacity to provide support to banks in case of need. Moody's very high probability of support for the banks in Qatar is driven by the government's shareholding in the banks, the importance of the banking system to the country's economy and past track record of pre-emptively supporting banks in 2009-2010.

INDIVIDUAL BANKS

QATAR NATIONAL BANK (QNB)

The key drivers for the affirmation of QNB's Aa3 long-term deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa1 BCA, and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support, which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa1 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

QNB's standalone profile is expected to come under pressure owing to the challenges in the operating environment, which are likely to reduce its liquidity buffers. Amongst the domestic banks, QNB has the highest level of external funding (around 49% of its total liabilities on a consolidated basis), which in the event the dispute becomes prolonged could lead to some outflows of external funding, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. This would also dampen the bank's strong profitability due to higher funding costs. The BCA also captures the bank's dominant domestic franchise with strong linkages to the government, which underpins its solid solvency position and is a key driver for the BCA affirmation.

QATAR ISLAMIC BANK (QIB)

The key drivers for the affirmation of QIB's A1 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa2 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support, which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa2 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

The rating agency expects QIB's standalone profile to come under pressure owing to its reliance on external funding, at 27% of its total assets as of December 2016, including sizable funding from the GCC countries (20% of its total assets). Should the dispute become prolonged, this could result in some outflows of external funding, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. These challenges are expected to lower the profitability of the bank as funding costs rise. Nevertheless, the BCA also captures the bank's well established and expanding retail and corporate Islamic banking franchise, which supports its overall solvency profile and is a key driver for the BCA affirmation.

DOHA BANK (DHBK)

The key drivers for the affirmation of DHBK's A2 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa3 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support, which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa3 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

Moody's expects DHBK's BCA to come under pressure due to the challenges in the operating environment, which are expected to reduce its liquidity buffers. The bank's market funding - which stands at 24% of total assets as of March 2017 (up from 21% as of December 2016) -could see some outflows in the event the dispute becomes prolonged, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. At the same time, the bank's profitability (as measured by net income to total assets), which recovered in 2017 after declining to 0.9% for 2016, due to higher provisioning costs, will likely face renewed pressure from a rise in funding costs. Nevertheless, the bank's solvency profile remains solid, underpinned by the recent capital increase from a QAR1.3 billion rights issue.

MASRAF AL RAYAN (Masraf)

The key drivers for the affirmation of Masraf's A1 issuer ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa2 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa2 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

Masraf's standalone profile remains underpinned by its solid solvency profile. However, this is expected to come under pressure owing to the challenges in the operating environment, which could reduce its liquidity buffers. The bank's reliance on external funding was around 14% of total assets as of December 2016. Although lower than some of its Qatari peers, the level has increased since then, and in the event the dispute prolongs there could be some outflows, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. In line with other Qatari banks, Moody's expects that MASRAF's profitability will soften as a result of a rise in funding costs.

QATAR INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC BANK (QIIB)

The key drivers for the affirmation of QIIB's A2 issuer ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa3 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support, which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa3 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

QIIB is exposed to the same challenges in the operating environment as other Qatari banks, which could lead to some reduction in its liquidity buffers, however, Moody's expects the bank's performance to be relatively resilient. The rating agency will monitor the evolution of the bank's solid retail-focused franchise which underpins its funding profile (around 70% of total deposits) and its stock of liquid assets which, despite some pressure, are expected to remain higher than its domestic peers (28% as of December 2016 vs 24% system average as of December 2016). In addition, the bank has maintained high capital buffers, which also support its current BCA.

BARWA BANK

The key drivers for the affirmation of Barwa Bank's A2 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa3 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa3 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

Barwa Bank's BCA is expected to come under pressure due to the challenges in the operating environment, which are expected to reduce its liquidity buffers. The bank's market funding - which currently stands at 18% of total assets -- has risen recently, and in the event the dispute becomes prolonged, there could be some outflows, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. The bank has a highly concentrated deposit base, more so than its peers, which may also create challenges in a tight liquidity environment. At the same time, the bank's profitability will continue to be pressured due to the rise in funding costs over the outlook period. Nevertheless, the BCA also captures Barwa Bank's solid asset quality and capital buffers, which underpin its overall solvency position and are key drivers of the BCA affirmation.

AHLI BANK

The key drivers for the affirmation of Ahli Bank's A2 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa3 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa3 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

Moody's says that Ahli Bank's standalone profile is expected to come under pressure owing to the challenges in the operating environment which are expected to reduce its liquidity buffers. The rating agency says that the bank's market funding has increased - at around 26% of total assets as of March 2017 up from 19% as of December 2016 - which in the event the dispute becomes prolonged could lead to some outflows, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. Moody's also expects the bank's profitability to decline over the outlook period due to higher funding costs. Nevertheless, the BCA also captures Ahli Bank's solid asset quality and capital buffers which underpin its overall solvency position and is a key driver for the BCA affirmation.

INTERNATIONAL BANK OF QATAR (IBQ)

The key drivers for the affirmation of IBQ's A2 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's baa3 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its baa3 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

Moody's expects IBQ's BCA to come under pressure due to the challenges in the operating environment, which are expected to reduce its liquidity buffers. The bank's market funding has increased - at 24% of total assets as of December 2016 up from 21% as of December 2015) -- which in the event the dispute becomes prolonged could lead to some outflows, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. At the same time, the bank's profitability will continue to be pressured due to the rise in funding costs over the outlook period. Nevertheless, the BCA also captures IBQ's solid asset quality and capital buffers, which underpin its overall solvency position and are key drivers of the BCA affirmation.

AL KHALIJ COMMERCIAL BANK (al khaliji)

The key drivers for the affirmation of al khaliji's A3 deposit ratings are Moody's (1) affirmation of the bank's ba1 BCA and (2) view of a continued very high likelihood of Qatari government support which continues to translate into four notches of uplift from its ba1 BCA. The change in outlook to negative from stable reflects both the pressure on the bank's standalone credit profile and the change in outlook on the sovereign rating.

The bank's standalone profile is expected to come under pressure owing to the challenges in the operating environment, which are expected to reduce its liquidity buffers. The bank's market funding, although reduced, remains high - 27% as of March 2017 down from 32% of total assets as of December 2016 - which in the event the dispute becomes prolonged could be subject to some outflows, while domestic liquidity conditions remain tight. At the same time, the bank's profitability (as measured by net income to total assets), which recovered during 2017 after declining to 0.6% for 2016 due to higher provisioning and funding costs, would likely face renewed pressure from a further rise in funding costs. Nevertheless, the BCA also captures al khaliji's solid asset quality and capital buffers, which underpin its overall solvency position and are key drivers of the BCA affirmation.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATINGS UP

Given the negative outlooks on the long-term deposit and issuer ratings of Qatari banks, upgrades are unlikely in the near future. There is also limited upside potential for the standalone BCAs of the banks given the rating action.

However, the outlook could be stabilized if there was swift resolution of the ongoing dispute.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATINGS DOWN

The standalone ratings of the banks could be downgraded if the deterioration in the operating environment leads to a weakening in funding and liquidity of the banks.

Likewise, long-term deposit or issuer ratings also benefit from government support uplift and could be affected negatively by a reduction in the government's capacity to provide support as indicated by change in the sovereign rating.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

Please click on this link http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_196398 for the List of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this Press Release and provides, for each of the credit ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the following items:

• Releasing Office

• Person Approving the Credit Rating

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Alexios Philippides
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Cyprus Ltd.
Porto Bello Building
1, Siafi Street, 3042 Limassol
PO Box 53205
Limassol CY 3301
Cyprus
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454

Sean Marion
MD - Financial Institutions
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Cyprus Ltd.
Porto Bello Building
1, Siafi Street, 3042 Limassol
PO Box 53205
Limassol CY 3301
Cyprus
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454

No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​
Global Footer | Moody's