(P)B2 rating assigned to upcoming notes
London, 30 April 2013 --
Moody's Investors Service has today assigned a first-time
B2 corporate family rating (CFR) and B2-PD Probability of Default
Rating (PDR) to BrightHouse Group plc. The outlook on the rating
is stable.
"The assigned B2 rating balances our assessment of the company's
scale and fairly high leverage, as well as the potential regulatory
and credit risks in the industry, with the company's solid
track record of growth and deleveraging in recent years, with reported
EBITDA rising to GBP49.4 million in FY2013 from GBP29.4
million in FY2009," says Richard Morawetz, a Moody's
Vice President - Senior Credit Officer and lead analyst for BrightHouse.
At the same time, Moody's has assigned a provisional (P)B2
rating (LGD4) to its upcoming senior secured notes due 2018, reflecting
the limited amount of senior-ranking debt in the capital structure.
Moody's issues provisional ratings in advance of the final sale of securities
and these ratings reflect the rating agency's preliminary credit
opinion regarding the transaction only. Upon a conclusive review
of the final documentation, Moody's will endeavour to assign a definitive
rating to the notes. A definitive rating may differ from a provisional
rating.
RATINGS RATIONALE
--CORPORATE FAMILY RATING AND PROBABILITY OF DEFAULT RATING
In Moody's view, the key constraints to BrightHouse's
B2 rating include its small scale and high leverage of approximately 5.8x
on a pro forma basis for the transaction and based on FYE2013 earnings,
as well as the risks related to potential regulatory changes, to
which the broader industry is also exposed. The Office of Fair
Trading currently regulates the consumer credit market, and while
recent reviews have not had any apparent impact on BrightHouse's
earnings, any significant reform to the provision of credit,
or to the terms that apply, could impact future growth. Moody's
also notes the credit risk associated with the loan book's quality
given the long-term nature of contracts and the company's
reliance on these contracts for future revenues. In BrightHouse's
case, approximately 64% of its FY2013 hire-purchase
revenues had been pre-sold as of the beginning of the year.
While this should in principle result in stable earnings, it relies
on careful control of the credit quality of the loan portfolio.
The company reported a bad debt charge of approximately 8% of revenues
over the past two years.
The B2 rating also reflects the company's strong track record of
growth and deleveraging in recent years, reflecting both its organic
growth as well as new store openings. BrightHouse reported 8.3%
like-for-like revenue growth in FY2013 (to March),
and 7.4% in FY 2012, which is strong compared with
rated retail peers, especially in non-food. The company
operates 280 stores across the UK, compared with 147 in 2007,
with 27 new stores having opened in FY2013 alone. BrightHouse's
client base consists largely of low-income earners (approximately
60% are below the UK median income), many of whom are recipients
of state benefits. Moody's believes that BrightHouse's
fairly unique product offering, notably product rentals over three
years with the right to purchase at the end of the contract, differentiates
it from most mainstream retailers, while it supplements this offering
with optional service and damage liability cover. Moody's
nevertheless assesses BrightHouse in the context of the broader retail
market, which can represent viable competition insofar as customers
can obtain credit financing from other sources, or indeed opt to
purchase with no credit.
Moody's deems the company's liquidity to be adequate.
Upon closing of the transaction, the company will retain approximately
GBP11 million in cash, of which GBP1.7 million is classified
as restricted due to solvency requirements reflecting the insurance business
and cash held in segregated accounts as a result of voluntary prepayments
by customers. The liquidity assessment further assumes that the
company will retain access to a Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) of GBP25
million, which is expected to be undrawn at closing. The
RCF will retain financial covenants for net debt-to-EBITDA,
falling from 6.8x as of June 2013 to 4.1x as of March 2016.
On the basis that the notes (and the longer-dated shareholder loans)
will represent the company's only debt liabilities, the company
is not expected to hold any short-term debt immediately post transaction.
The rating agency also expects that the company will retain strong covenant
headroom under the RCF at all times. Given the seasonality in cash
flows -- with the third quarter seeing a working capital
outflow due to higher demand -- Moody's expects that
the peak drawing on the RCF will be in that quarter. On this basis,
if the RCF were to become inaccessible, Moody's would view
the company's liquidity as weak, or potentially inadequate,
and this could have rating implications.
-- PROVISIONAL (P)B2 RATING OF SENIOR SECURED NOTES
The provisional (P)B2 rating of the notes, at the same level as
the CFR, reflects the limited amount of debt ranking ahead of the
notes. The guarantors for the notes and the RCF are the same.
However, based on the terms of an inter-creditor agreement,
while the liens securing the notes will rank equally with the liens that
secure the RCF, in the event of enforcement of the collateral,
holders of the notes will receive proceeds only after the lenders under
the RCF have been repaid in full.
The GBP220 million in senior secured notes due 2018 will be used to repay
existing debt of approximately GBP75 million, certain transaction
costs and the repayment of GBP128.8 million of the existing shareholder
loan of GBP153.9 million, of which GBP25.1 million
will remain outstanding. On this basis, following this transaction
and based on FYE2013 results, the company's pro forma gross
adjusted leverage is estimated at approximately 5.8x. Moody's
has not added back the depreciation of rental assets in calculating EBITDA,
in line with management's calculation of EBITDA.
RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK
Following the transaction, the company will be weakly positioned
within the rating category, but Moody's believes that the
company's track record of deleveraging will enable it to become
more strongly-positioned in the rating category over time.
For the rating to be more firmly positioned, gross adjusted leverage
would need to trend towards 5x. The assigned B2 CFR reflects Moody's
view that, based on past performance, this could be achieved
in the next 12-18 months.
WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN
In light of the current rating positioning, upward pressure is unlikely
in the current year. However, the rating could be positively
impacted if leverage were to fall comfortably below 4.5x with strong
liquidity. Conversely, there could be downward pressure if
leverage were to rise above 6x on a continued basis, or if liquidity
conditions deteriorated. On this basis, there remains limited
flexibility within the current rating category.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in this rating was the Global Retail Industry
published in June 2011. Other methodologies used include Loss Given
Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in
the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009.
Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for
a copy of these methodologies.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and
whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Richard Morawetz
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Paloma San Valentin
MD - Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Moody's assigns B2 CFR to BrightHouse Group plc; outlook stable