Madrid, December 22, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned a definitive long-term rating
to the Spanish multi-issuer covered bonds (SMICBs) issued by Cédulas
TdA 21, Fondo de Titulización de Activos. The notes
have a fixed-rate coupon of 4.250%, with an
expected maturity in 27 December 2014:
- Aaa. This rating is on review for possible downgrade;
EUR 3,450 million, December 2014
This transaction is a repeat issuance of SMICBs through a new closed Fund,
in accordance with the Spanish Securitisation Law. The transaction
repackages a portfolio of mortgage covered bonds (Cédulas Hipotecarias
or "CHs") issued by six Spanish financial entities (the Issuers).
The notes are backed by a pool of CHs issued by: Banco de Valencia
(21.74%), Caja España de Inversiones,
Salamanca y Soria (28.99%), Caja Laboral (14.49%),
Catalunya Caixa (17.39%), Ipar Kutxa (2.90%),
Caixa Penedés (14.49%) . Each CH is a full-recourse
obligation of the issuing entity and is secured on the entire mortgage
pool owned by that issuer. The Fund has financed the purchase of
the CHs with the proceeds of the SMICBs. The transaction aims to
provide the Issuers with eligible assets, which can be used as guarantees
for Eurosystem monetary policy operations. The CHs can be early
redeemed at each issuer's request.
RATINGS RATIONALE
Moody's says that among other factors, the definitive rating
takes into account the following:
(i) The credit strength of the underlying portfolio of CHs.
(ii) The credit strength is itself a function of (a) the unsecured credit
strength of each of the six Issuers; (b) the additional security
provided by the collateral securing each CH; and (c) the legal framework
for CHs in Spain.
(iii) Over-collateralisation (OC) levels held by the participating
entities. The high level of OC on each of the six CHs offsets possible
credit deterioration of the Cover Pool composition and interest-rate
and refinancing risks.
(iv) The Issuers will be able to use a committed liquidity facility (LF)
to pay any interest shortfalls on the SMICBs, equivalent to two
years coupon. The full available amount was deposited at closing
in a deposit account held at Bankinter (rated A1 on review for possible
downgrade/Prime-1/C). The LF does not provide credit protection
against losses from insufficient recoveries, since any withdrawn
amount will be repaid to the LF provider in a senior position to the notes'
principal redemption. However, this mechanism will reduce
the default probability linked to the issuers' ratings (v) The default
of a CH does not result in a wind-down of the Fund. A default
of a CH does not imply an acceleration of the Fund, but an extension
of the Fund maturity up to three years if the default occurs at the scheduled
maturity. In this case the SMICBs will be paid down at the scheduled
maturity except for the portion corresponding to the defaulted CHs.
This results in an improvement of the recoveries on the defaulted CHs
for the contractual maturity of the SMICBs and thus increases the probability
of their timely payment.
As is the case with other covered bonds, Moody's considers the transaction
to be linked to the credit strength of the Issuers, in particular
from a timeliness of payment perspective.
The final Aaa rating is on review for possible downgrade given that the
disclosed participants' senior unsecured ratings were placed on
review for possible downgrade on 20 December 2010. For further
information on the rating actions taken by Moody's Financial Institutions
Group, please refer to "Moody's takes actions on rated Spanish banks
further to sovereign rating review" published on 20 December 2010.
During the review, Moody's will consider the negative rating impact
of the final senior unsecured rating of the participants.
The ratings assigned by Moody's address the expected loss posed
to investors. Moody's ratings address only the credit risks
associated with the transaction. Other non-credit risks
have not been addressed, but may have a significant effect on yield
to investors.
KEY RATING ASSUMPTIONS/FACTORS
SMICBs can be considered a repackaging of a pool of Spanish covered bonds.
Each SMICB is backed by a group of Spanish covered bonds (Cedulas) which
are bought by a Fund, which in turn issues SMICBs.
Moody's rating for any SMICB is determined after applying a two-step
process:
(i) First step: Moody's determines a rating based on the expected
loss on the SMICB.
The main driver of the expected loss (EL) of an SMICB is the credit strength
of the CHs backing the SMICBs. If the CHs perform, the SMICBs
will be fully repaid. CHs are rated according to Moody's published
covered bond methodology. In the absence of any other support (for
example, such as a reserve fund), the EL of the SMICB is determined
directly from the weighted-average EL (weighted by their outstanding
amounts) of the CHs backing the SMICB.
The primary model used is Moody's Covered Bond Model (COBOL) which
determines expected loss as a function of the issuer's probability
of default, measured by its long-term rating, and the
stressed losses on the cover pool assets following issuer default.
The long-term rating used for the six participants are:
- Banco de Valencia: Baa1 on review for possible downgrade.
- Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria:
Baa1 on review for possible downgrade.
- Caja Laboral: A3 on review for possible downgrade.
- Catalunya Caixa: A3 on review for possible downgrade.
- Ipar Kutxa: undisclosed
- Caixa Penedés: undisclosed
The Cover Pool Losses for each CH are:
- Banco de Valencia: 50.6%
- Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria:
47.4%
- Caja Laboral: 31.6%
- Catalunya Caixa: 45.5%
- Ipar Kutxa: 42.1%
- Caixa Penedés: 39.0%
This is an estimate of the losses Moody's currently models in the
event of issuer default. Cover Pool Losses can be split between
Market Risk and Collateral Risk. Market Risk measures losses as
a result of refinancing risk and risks related to interest-rate
and currency mismatches (these losses may also include certain legal risks).
Collateral Risk measures losses resulting directly from the credit quality
of the assets in the cover pool. Collateral Risk is derived from
the Collateral Score. The Market risks and Collateral Risks for
the four CHs are:
- Banco de Valencia: 22.9% and 27.7%
- Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria:
20.4% and 27.0%
- Caja Laboral: 19.7% and 11.9%
- Catalunya Caixa: 22.4% and 23.2%
- Ipar Kutxa: 21.7% and 20.4%
- Caixa Penedés: 18.6% and 20.4%
(ii) Second step: A secondary rating target for SMICBs is the probability
of default.
Under the SMICB rating approach, Moody's gives value to two
primary liquidity supports that improve the probability of timely payment
if any CH backing the SMICB fails to make a payment on a scheduled payment
date. These are: (i) the maturity extension on the SMICB,
which should ensure that a period of at least two years is available following
any default on the CH. This period would be available to realise
the value of the assets backing the CH; and (ii) an LF that is available
to cover interest payments on the SMICB. Under the SMICB rating
method, the LF benefiting any SMICB can be sized to improve the
timely payment of the SMICB to a level commensurate with the SMICBs'
rating. However, regardless of the size of the LF,
Moody's would not rate any SMICB Aaa if any of the issuers of the
CHs supporting it were rated below Baa3, unless further structural
measures (for example, a reserve fund) were implemented.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The robustness of a covered bond rating largely depends on the credit
strength of the underlying issuers. Moody's considers that given
the structural enhancements in this transaction, the Aaa ratings
assigned to the notes may remain appropriate provided:
- All participating entities in the series are rated Baa1 or above.
Moody's notes that given that the underlying CHs are fully callable,
there is a tail-risk that a single issuer will be left backing
the SMICBs. In this case, Moody's considers that the
minimum issuer's rating to achieve Aaa would be Baa1.
- The committed levels of over-collateralisation on any
entity are compatible with a Aaa expected loss.
- The LF is sized sufficiently.
A multiple notch downgrade of the covered bonds might occur in certain
limited circumstances. Some examples might be (i) a sovereign downgrade
negatively affecting the issuers' senior unsecured rating;
(ii) a multiple notch downgrade of the issuers; or (iii) a material
reduction of the value of the cover pool
For further details on Cover Pool Losses, Collateral Risk,
Market Risk, Collateral Score across all covered bond programmes
rated by Moody's please refer to "Moody's EMEA Covered
Bonds Monitoring Overview", published quarterly. These
figures are based on the most recent reporting by the issuer and are subject
to change over time.
The principal methodologies used in this rating were Rating Spanish Multi-Issuer
Covered Bonds, published in September 2009 and Moody's Rating
Approach to Covered Bonds published in March 2010. In addition,
Moody's publishes a weekly summary of structured finance credit,
ratings and methodologies, available to all registered users of
our website, at www.moodys.com/SFQuickCheck.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings,
public information and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors
Service information.
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the issuer or obligation satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining
a credit rating.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible
Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the
three years preceding the Credit Rating Action. Please see the
ratings disclosure page www.moodys.com/disclosures on our
website for further information.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Madrid
Juan Pablo Soriano
MD - Structured Finance
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service Espana, S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Madrid
Jose de Leon
Senior Vice President
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service Espana, S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Moody's Investors Service Espana, S.A.
Barbara de Braganza, 2
Madrid 28004
Spain
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Moody's assigns definitive ratings to Cédulas TDA 21's covered bonds
