Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
13 Sep 2010
Moody's places Cavalier Telephone Ratings Under Review for Possible Upgrade
New York, September 13, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service changed the rating outlook on PAETEC Holding
Corp.'s ("PAETEC") debt to negative from stable
reflecting concerns about execution risk related to integration of the
historically underperforming operations of Cavalier Telephone Corporation
("Cavalier"), which PAETEC has agreed to acquire for
$460 million in cash. In addition, Moody's downgraded
PAETEC's short term liquidity rating to SGL-2 from SGL-1,
reflecting the moderately worsening proforma liquidity profile as PAETEC
devotes its cash resources to integrate and turn around the Cavalier operations.
At the same time, Moody's has placed the debt of CavTel Holdings,
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Cavalier, on review
for possible upgrade. The review for upgrade incorporates the benefits
of PAETEC's stronger credit profile and the high perceived likelihood
that the transaction will be completed as planned. The proposed
transaction incorporates an expectation that Cavalier's existing
rated debt will be repaid by PAETEC upon completion, after which
Moody's anticipates it would raise Cavalier's debt ratings to at least
the senior unsecured-equivalent level of PAETEC and immediately
thereafter withdraw its ratings for Cavalier. Moody's notes
that Cavalier will seek a waiver of potential covenant defaults under
its credit agreement for the period between 3Q 2010 and closing of the
transaction, for which we would expect the bank group to be accommodating.
PAETEC's B2 corporate family rating and the negative rating outlook
reflect the Company's high leverage for its rating category and modest
free cash flow, compounded by the challenge to turn around and integrate
the acquired Cavalier properties amid the revenue declines at Cavalier's
non-fiber businesses. The rating also reflects Moody's
view that the operating environment for competitive local exchange carriers
("CLECs") will likely continue to be difficult. Moody's
notes that PAETEC's revenues have stabilized after declining over the
past 24 months as the economy is showing signs of a slow recovery.
Moody's remains concerned, however, about the pace of
the recovery and the relative softness in the company's Midwest
markets in particular will challenge the Company's ability to grow revenues
and delever over the next 12-18 months. Ratings continue
to be supported, nonetheless, by PAETEC's operating scale
as, proforma for the Cavalier acquisition, it will become
the largest CLECs operator in the US, and benefits from the potential
for the Company to drive its cost structure lower by migrating traffic
onto its expanding fiber network and provide a platform for greater product
diversity by utilizing its long-haul and metro fiber assets.
Proforma for the acquisition, we believe PAETEC's Moody's
adjusted Debt/EBITDA leverage will rise to about 4.2x, from
4.1x at 6/30/10. These leverage levels are notably above
the downgrade triggers previously indicated by Moody's, and
the integration of Cavalier and the resulting synergies will likely take
some time to take effect, especially in light of the ongoing turnaround
of the operations put in place by Cavalier's management team.
Both of the aforementioned factors contribute to the outlook revision
to a negative bias.
Although PAETEC has been successful in integrating several CLECs in the
past, the results achieved in the most recent McLeod USA acquisition
took longer than expected. The challenge at Cavalier will be magnified
by its higher concentration of residential and small business customers,
relative to the core PAETEC target companies, which historically
have been larger enterprises with 100 or more lines. Still,
Moody's expects PAETEC to benefit from Cavalier's deep fiber
network in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, as it stands to
reduce its operating expense by moving more traffic onto its own network
and colocation facilities.
The downgrade of PAETEC's liquidity rating to SGL-2 from SGL-1
reflects Moody's view that it should maintain good liquidity over the
coming 12 months, as some of the company's liquidity will
be utilized to integrate Cavalier. Moody's believes that proforma
for the acquisition, PAETEC will have about $80 million in
cash, which is down from the company's $124 million
cash balance at 6/30/10, and expects PAETEC to have full access
to its $50 million revolver. PAETEC's revolving credit facility
includes a consolidated total net leverage covenant test set at 5.0x
for the life of the credit facility. Based on Moody's expectations
of the Company's operating performance, we estimate PAETEC has ample
headroom under the leverage covenant. The Company's credit agreement
includes an excess cash sweep requirement if leverage exceeds 2.5x.
Although PAETEC has currently suspended selling wholesale fiber capacity,
except in cases when it generates network revenues from customers,
it could resume the fiber sales which could provide an alternative source
of liquidity in times of stress.
Moody's could stabilize the rating outlook if PAETEC demonstrates
progress in achieving targeted cost synergies and delivers stable revenue
performance, such that its adjusted Debt/EBITDA leverage trends
Downward rating pressure could develop if the company does not show improvement
in its operating performance and adjusted Debt/EBITDA leverage remains
elevated above 4.0x by year-end 2011 and there is an ongoing
deterioration in free cash flow generation. Ratings could also
come under pressure if changes in the competitive and/or regulatory environment
threaten PAETEC's ability to sustain its EBITDA margins at current levels.
Upward rating consideration could be warranted if the Company maintains
Debt-to-EBITDA leverage below 2.5x, either
through better-than-expected operating performance or from
debt reduction, and free cash flow-to-debt exceeds
10% on a sustainable basis. Ratings and/or the rating outlook
may be revisited if competitive and regulatory dynamics lead to a greater
degree of stability in the competitive telecommunications industry that
could be driven by continuing consolidation. As a result,
Moody's will look for signs of firmness in pricing terms, improving
financial metrics, solid liquidity position, stability of
cash flows, diminishing capital expenditures and growth through
Moody's most recent rating action on PAETEC was on January 6,
2010 when Moody's assigned a B1 rating to the PAETEC's senior
secured note issuance.
Moody's most recent rating action on CavTel Holdings LLC was on
August 28, 2009 when Moody's downgraded CavTel, LLC's
Corporate Family Rating to Caa2 and the Probability of Default Rating
to Caa3, reflecting the rating agency's view of a heightened risk
of default, as covenants in the company's senior secured credit
facility were set to revert to original levels at the end of 2010.
The principal methodology used in rating PAETEC and Cavalier was Moody's
Global Telecommunications Industry Methodology, published in December
2007 and available on www.moodys.com in the Rating Methodologies
sub-directory under the Research & Ratings tab. Other
methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process
of rating this issuer can also be found in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory
on Moody's website.
PAETEC is a CLEC headquartered in Fairport, NY. The company
generated nearly $1.6 billion in revenues in 2009.
Richmond, Virginia based Cavalier is a competitive local exchange
carrier, which generated over $400 million in revenues in
MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Senior Vice President
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's changes PAETEC's rating outlook to Negative, downgrades liquidity rating to SGL2
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.