Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
12 May 2010
Approximately $608 million of rated debt securities affected
New York, May 12, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service affirmed Regency Energy Partners LP's
ratings and changed the rating outlook to positive from stable.
This action is in response to its announcement that Regency's general
partner (GP) sponsor, an affiliate of GE Energy Financial Services,
has sold its interest in Regency's GP to Energy Transfer Equity,
L.P. (ETE, Ba1) for $300 million and that concurrently
Regency was purchasing a 49.9% stake in Midcontinent Express
Pipeline LLC (MEP, Ba1) from ETE. Ratings affirmed include
Regency's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating, Ba3 Probability of
Default Rating, SGL-3 speculative grade liquidity rating,
and B1 (LGD 5, 80%) ratings on its senior unsecured notes.
The ratings affirmation and positive outlook reflect the expected benefits
to Regency from the MEP acquisition, including increased scale and
diversification, with a greater proportion of fee-based revenues,
which helps mitigate the risks associated with the change in sponsorship
from financially stronger GE to ETE. There is a degree of uncertainty
regarding the company's future growth strategy and financial policies
under ETE's control. In addition, near-term
financial leverage could be elevated and the transactions involve a level
of structural complexity.
GE is selling its ownership in Regency's GP to ETE for $300
million in preferred units in ETE. As a result, ETE will
own the 2% GP interest in Regency and all of Regency's incentive
distribution rights (IDRs). ETE will also be Regency's largest
LP unit holder, with an approximately 22% ownership stake.
ETE is a publicly traded partnership that currently owns approximately
one-third of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.'s
(ETP, Baa3) limited partner (LP) units outstanding, as well
as a 1.8% GP interest and all of ETP's IDRs.
ETP and Regency are expected to operate as separate entities.
Regency is purchasing ETE's 49.9% stake in MEP for
approximately $600 million in equity, which will be issued
directly to ETE. Regency has also assumed $86 million in
capital contribution obligations to MEP to finish its expansion.
Any cost overruns on the expansion would be borne by ETE. MEP is
a joint venture with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (Baa2) consisting of
a 507 mile interstate natural gas pipeline that originates in Oklahoma
and terminates at Transco Station 85 near Butler, Alabama.
Kinder Morgan is the operator of the line. MEP was placed into
service in August 2009 and its current expansion is expected to be placed
in service in August 2010, barring any delays (regulatory approvals
have been obtained).
Regency's Ba3 rating had factored in its ownership from financially
strong GE and Regency's track record in issuing equity under its
ownership by GE. With the change in sponsorship, there is
a degree of uncertainty regarding Regency's future direction,
including distribution growth policies. ETE, being a publicly
traded partnership, makes Regency's distributions to its GP
in effect a fixed and growing cash requirement, thus posing potential
dividend pressure on Regency to meet ETE's distributions.
Moreover, ETE has its own debt obligations, which are serviced
solely by distributions (from both ETP and Regency). Moody's
notes that ETE has considerable midstream operating experience.
We also note that GE is expected to retain a significant stake in Regency,
owning approximately 21% of Regency's LP units and will have
the right to name two board members (based on its level of LP ownership).
It is also Moody's understanding that Regency's current management
team will remain in place after the transactions close.
The MEP transaction positively impacts Regency's overall business
risk profile, providing increased scale and diversification,
and MEP's long-term transportation contracts will provide
Regency with a higher proportion of fee-based volumes. MEP
serves an important regional role in moving shale gas production downstream
towards long-haul transmission lines and has 100% of its
firm capacity contracted with an average life of around nine years.
Once its expansion is complete, MEP is expected to contribute to
approximately 20% of Regency's cash flows. However,
MEP is a producer-driven pipeline, with its shipper portfolio
comprised primarily of speculative grade exploration and production companies,
which places uncertainty on the long-term regional demand for the
Regency's leverage profile could be elevated over the near-term.
While the MEP transaction is being conservatively financed with 100%
equity, MEP has its own debt obligations (including operating leases)
that Moody's will include on a pro-rata basis when assessing
Regency's credit profile. In addition, Regency is expected
to initially debt finance its $86 million capital commitment in
MEP and has debt financed its recently announced $92 million purchase
of an additional 7% interest in its RIGS joint venture.
Moody's estimates Regency's debt/EBITDA, pro-forma
for the MEP transaction (including debt financing of the additional capital
requirements at MEP) and its purchase of an additional 7% interest
in RIGS, at approximately 4.8x, as compared to 5.2x
for 2009. Moody's notes that pro forma leverage declines
to 4.5x once the MEP expansion is complete. However,
we believe that there is a risk that financial leverage could remain elevated
over the near-term, as the company pursues growth projects
in its gathering and processing business in the Haynesville Shale and
to a lesser extent in the Eagle Ford Shale, as well as expansion
projects by its RIGS joint venture. While the credit benefits of
the MEP transaction and recently completed RIGS expansion help to somewhat
mitigate the potential for high leverage, equity will continue to
need to be issued upfront and on a regular basis in order to support a
The transactions involve an increased level of structural complexity.
Regency bondholders will not have direct access to over a third of the
company's pro-forma EBITDA due to the joint venture structures
for both MEP and its RIGS system. Cash distributions to Regency
from MEP will be burdened by MEP's own debt service obligations.
In addition, the RIGS joint venture is expected to use debt to finance
In order to be upgraded to Ba2, Regency will need to develop a track
record under ETE's sponsorship as it continues to pursue growth
projects, including successfully maintaining a lower financial leverage
profile (below 4.5x debt/EBITDA and trending towards 4.0x)
and conservatively managing its distribution policies.
The last rating action on Regency was on February 1, 2010 when Moody's
affirmed the company's ratings at Ba3 and changed the outlook to stable
The principal rating methodology used in rating Regency was Moody's
Midstream Energy Companies and Partnerships Industry Rating Methodology,
published in September 2007 and available on www.moodys.com
in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory under the Research and
Ratings tab. Other methodologies and factors that may have been
considered in the process of rating this issuer can also be found in the
Rating Methodologies sub-directory on Moody's website.
Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Regency Energy Partners LP
is a publicly traded master limited partnership engaged in natural gas
gathering, processing, contract compression and transportation.
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's changes Regency Energy's outlook to positive
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.