Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's changes Turkey's rating outlook to negative from stable; affirms Ba1 issuer rating

Global Credit Research - 17 Mar 2017

New York, March 17, 2017 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today changed Turkey's rating outlook to negative from stable. Moody's has also affirmed Turkey's government debt and issuer ratings at Ba1 and shelf ratings at (P)Ba1.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The change in the rating outlook to negative captures a combination of inter-related drivers:

- The continuing erosion of Turkey's institutional strength;

- Its weaker growth outlook;

- Heightened pressures on Turkey's public and external accounts;

- And in consequence, the increased risk of a credit shock.

The affirmation of Turkey's Ba1 rating reflects the government's high economic and fiscal strength, which continues to provide a buffer against the risks posed by its diminished institutional strength and high external vulnerability; and the economy's intrinsic dynamism, which Moody's would expect to be revitalized if structural reforms were enacted as intended and political uncertainty was reduced.

Concurrently, Moody's has affirmed the Ba1 senior unsecured bond rating of Hazine Mustesarligi Varlik Kiralama A.S., a special purpose vehicle wholly owned by the Republic of Turkey. The outlook was changed to negative from stable.

Turkey's country ceilings remain unchanged at Baa2/Prime-3 (foreign currency bonds), Ba2/NP (foreign currency bank deposits) and Baa1 (local currency debt and deposits).

RATIONALE FOR CHANGING TURKEY'S RATING OUTLOOK TO NEGATIVE FROM STABLE

Since Moody's last rating action in September, domestic and external pressures on Turkey's credit profile have risen materially.

The tense domestic political environment following last July's failed coup has persisted for longer than expected, a situation that the referendum on April 16 to centralize executive powers within the presidency is unlikely to alter given the large divide between the ruling Justice and Development (AK) Party and the opposition over the proposed constitutional changes. The actions taken to reduce various forms of opposition to the government since July last year have undermined the country's administrative capacity and damaged private sector confidence.

Partly as a consequence, Turkey has experienced a further slowdown in growth. While Moody's expects the particularly poor economic performance registered in the third quarter of 2016 to be temporary, the impact of ongoing political and geopolitical tensions on domestic confidence, and the heightened external pressures that led to a steep depreciation of the lira and high inflation, will suppress growth in the near-term relative to expectations last year. Over the longer term, potential growth will remain relatively low by historical standards in the continued absence of the structural economic reforms originally planned, such as in the labor market, to boost sagging productivity.

The authorities' policy response has focused primarily on supporting short-term economic activity and has increased moral hazard. The central bank has relaxed macro-prudential rules in order to stimulate credit growth, reversing measures undertaken in 2012-2014 to restrain growth in household debt. The authorities have encouraged banks to increase lending, to restructure payment schedules and to allow companies to repay foreign currency-denominated loans in Turkish lira at a favorable exchange rate. And the central bank has held its key policy interest rate negative in real terms in the face of rising inflationary pressures (with inflation exceeding the 5%±2% target), primarily it seems to avoid increasing financing pressures on domestic firms. Moody's believes that such measures risk increasing macro-economic imbalances, while failing to address the fundamental structural issues impeding growth.

According to Moody's, weaker growth is negatively impacting Turkey's key credit anchor -- its healthy public finances and low government debt. The government has taken a range of measures to mitigate the domestic impact of the sluggish economy, including providing wage subsidies to firms and postponing the due dates for their tax and social security payments. Stopping such support will be difficult since the factors weighing on consumption and investment, such as higher inflation and interest rates and declining productivity, are structural rather than cyclical. Moody's expects the increase in government spending to continue into 2018, the fiscal deficit to widen and bond yields to continue to rise, with adverse implications for Turkey's debt metrics.

Turkey's external vulnerability is a long-standing credit weakness, but has been accentuated in recent months by a number of factors. While some, such as rising US interest rates, are external to Turkey, most reflect domestic developments that have undermined domestic and foreign investor confidence, or geopolitical considerations, such as terrorist attacks, that have had significant adverse consequences for tourism. The lira has weakened sharply, with capital inflows intermittently insufficient to finance the current account, eroding the central bank's already weak foreign exchange reserve buffer. As a consequence, Turkey's External Vulnerability Indicator remains elevated at an estimated 202% in 2017, well above the 50% level seen in most of Turkey's emerging market peers. The depreciation has exacerbated the corporate sector's already large foreign currency debt service costs at a time when profitability is being squeezed by high inflation and rising interest rates. With a sizeable share of banking system loans denominated in foreign currency, domestic banks' asset quality is also under pressure, although the banks' capital buffers remain relatively healthy.

RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMING TURKEY'S Ba1 ISSUER RATING

In all of these respects, the pressures on Turkey's credit profile have risen since the last rating action. However, the sovereign retains some important credit strengths that mitigate these pressures and that continue to support a Ba1 rating.

Turkey's key strengths include its large size and its flexible, middle-income economy, which benefits from favorable demographics, specifically its relatively young population, and diverse trade linkages. These factors continue to support a potential growth rate of about 3.3%, according to the IMF. The government's fiscal deficit, debt and debt affordability metrics remain materially stronger than most similarly-rated peers. Furthermore, as a result of a proactive debt-management strategy, debt maturities have been lengthened and debt is largely issued at fixed rates. This structure has helped to soften the pass-through of the lira weakness to the government's debt metrics and debt affordability.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN

Potential upward movement in Turkey's issuer rating is constrained by balance-of-payments pressures as long as external imbalances and refinancing requirements remain large. However, upward rating pressure could materialize in the event of structural reductions in these vulnerabilities or material improvements in Turkey's institutional environment or competitiveness. Reductions in political risk emanating either from the geopolitical or domestic political environment, while credit positive, would not result in upward rating actions in the absence of sustainable improvements in external vulnerability although such developments could lead to a stabilization of the rating outlook.

Turkey's sovereign rating would likely be downgraded if there is a material increase in the probability of a balance of payments crisis. Such an event would likely be associated with some combination of a rapidly falling exchange rate, a sharp further reduction in reserves or sustained capital outflows. Sustained lower growth and a related worsening in the government's fiscal strength could also precipitate a downgrade, as could a further erosion of institutional strength.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 20,420 (2015 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 2% (2016 Estimate) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 8.5% (2016 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -1.2% (2016 Estimate) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -3.8% (2016 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 49.8% (2016 Estimate)

Level of economic development: Moderate level of economic resilience

Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.

On 14 March 2017, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Turkey, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, are weakening. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has not materially decreased. The issuer has become increasingly susceptible to event risks.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Kristin Lindow
Senior Vice President
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Yves Lemay
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.