Moodys.com
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

 

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

 

Terms of One-Time Website Use

 

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

 

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

 

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

 

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

 

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Rating Action:

Moody's changes outlook on Azerbaijan's rating to positive from stable; Ba2 rating affirmed

06 Apr 2021

Singapore, April 06, 2021 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today changed the outlook on Azerbaijan's rating to positive from stable and affirmed the long-term issuer and senior unsecured debt ratings at Ba2.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's assessment that governance and in particular policy effectiveness is improving, albeit from a low base, which may raise the resilience of the government's credit profile. In particular, enhancements to the monetary and macro policy framework may promote stability in the external and banking sectors in the face of shocks, while continued effective use of sizeable fiscal buffers would allow counter cyclical spending and limits the deterioration in the government's fiscal and debt metrics.

The rating affirmation balances credit strengths from the country's sizeable net creditor position that underpins fiscal strength and lowers government liquidity and external vulnerability risks, as well as relative domestic political stability that supports the implementation of oil and gas projects, against credit challenges including still limited prospects for economic diversification, longstanding institutional and governance weaknesses, and geopolitical tensions with neighbouring Armenia.

Concurrently, Moody's has changed the outlook on the backed foreign currency senior unsecured rating of Southern Gas Corridor CJSC (SGC) to positive from stable, and affirmed the Ba2 rating. SGC has received explicitly guarantees on all of its foreign currency debt.

Azerbaijan's local and foreign currency ceilings remain at Baa3 and Ba2, respectively. The narrower-than-average two-notch gap between the local currency ceiling and the sovereign rating reflects the large footprint of the government on the economy and still weak institutions and governance, notwithstanding ample sovereign wealth assets that support the country's external and macroeconomic stability. The two-notch gap between the foreign currency ceiling and the local currency ceiling takes into consideration still limited confidence in the local currency and the lack of currency flexibility against the dollar, which raise the risk of transfer and convertibility restrictions. These ceilings typically act as a cap on the ratings that can be assigned to the obligations of other entities domiciled in the country.

Please click on this link https://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_ARFTL443692 for the List of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this Press Release and identifies each affected issuer.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR THE POSITIVE OUTLOOK

An improving macroeconomic and fiscal policy framework -- albeit from relatively weak levels -- points to greater resilience of the government's credit profile. Policy adjustments since the 2014-17 shock have the potential to shore up stability of Azerbaijan's macroeconomic environment, banking sector, and fiscal and debt metrics through shocks, as seen during the coronavirus pandemic.

Enhancements to exchange rate management and the communication of monetary policy by the Central Bank of Azerbaijan (CBAR) are likely to foster stability in Azerbaijan's external and foreign exchange market dynamics. Besides the predictable supply of US dollars through regular auctions of transfers by the State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan (SOFAZ) into the government's budget, CBAR has the ability to step up the frequency of the auctions to meet temporary increases in the demand for dollars. In monetary policy communication, regular publication of and increased transparency in monetary policy priorities, decisions and meetings also help manage inflation and risk sentiment. In 2020, these combined to keep the manat stable against the dollar, despite the significant shock of the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on oil prices. Foreign exchange reserve levels rose slightly over the course of 2020, signalling limited external pressures, in turn allowing CBAR to cut policy rates by 125 basis points to provide monetary accommodation. Going forward, consistent reliance on predictable and transparent monetary and exchange rate policy would boost macroeconomic stability and the resilience to shocks.

Similarly, continued application of reforms enacted ahead of the coronavirus shock and proactive regulatory forbearance during the pandemic would improve bank regulation and oversight further, supporting stability of the sector and containing any potential second round effects of a shock through impairments to credit supply and contingent liability risks to the sovereign. Already, measures implemented in the wake of the large 2014-17 oil price shock, such as restrictions on foreign currency exposure, the resolution of legacy problem loans, and recapitalisation requirements, have raised the resilience of banks' balance sheets. Moody's expects the resumption of banking sector reforms this year, including the rollout of Basel 3 requirements relating to liquidity and risk management to further promote stability in the banking system.

Furthermore, effective use of fiscal buffers within the framework of Azerbaijan's fiscal rules has the potential to reduce macroeconomic risks while limiting the deterioration in fiscal and debt metrics in comparison with peers. This was also illustrated during the pandemic. By activating the escape clause to its fiscal rule for 2020-21 and increasing the level of SOFAZ transfers slightly compared to 2019 -- instead of reducing the transfers with the decline in oil revenue -- the government was able to support the economy through cash handouts to low income families, unemployment benefits, the temporary creation of public jobs, wage and tuition subsidies, and discounts on utility bills in 2020, as well as higher infrastructure spending this year. While fiscal buffers have increased at a slower pace, the increase in the government's debt burden has been relatively modest, reaching 23% of GDP at the end of 2020 from slightly above 20% a year prior. This compares to the median increase of over 10 percentage points of GDP across Ba-rated peers. Moody's assumptions for Azerbaijan's government debt include all of its direct debt and the guaranteed debt of Azerbaijan Railways, which is undergoing restructuring and receives ongoing financial support from the government. At the same time, Moody's no longer includes the guaranteed debt of Aqrarkredit -- which amounted to around 13% of GDP at the end of 2020 -- in government debt; the rating agency expects Aqrarkredit will continue to service its obligations without government financial support.

Overall, the enhancements to Azerbaijan's policy framework, if sustained, would lower government liquidity risk, contain external vulnerability, and provide policy flexibility, especially aided by Azerbaijan's large net creditor status and sizeable sovereign wealth assets.

RATIONALE FOR THE RATING AFFIRMATION

The affirmation of Azerbaijan's Ba2 rating is underpinned by the government's large net asset position -- which in addition to providing fiscal flexibility also contains government liquidity and external vulnerability risk as discussed above -- and the relative stability in domestic politics that will continue to facilitate the implementation of oil and gas projects and provide policy continuity. Balanced against these credit strengths are the country's still significant reliance on oil and gas to drive longer-term economic growth and support government finances, still limited prospects for economic diversification beyond this sector, as well as longstanding institutional and governance challenges and geopolitical tensions with Armenia that weigh on economic competitiveness.

Assets held by SOFAZ, which are foreign currency denominated and invested in liquid markets, continued growing in 2020 despite the pandemic, and are large enough to cover nearly 480% of the government's direct debt. Based on Moody's oil price assumptions of $45-65 per barrel over the medium term, the size of SOFAZ assets is likely to keep growing over the next few years, absent a sharp increase in transfers to the government.

Meanwhile, Moody's expects Azerbaijan's economy to continue to be driven by developments in its oil and gas sector for the foreseeable future. The oil and gas sector accounts for around 45% of GDP directly, 90% of total goods exports, 70% of industrial production and 60-70% of consolidated government revenue. In 2021, besides base effects stemming from the relaxation of coronavirus-related restrictions on activity and movement, increased oil production under the agreement with the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and higher gas production as exports to Europe ramp up with the completion of the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline at the end of last year underpin Moody's real GDP growth forecast of around 3.5%. Over the next 2-3 years, Moody's estimates growth to average around 3%, supported by ongoing reinvestment in the existing oil and gas fields -- such as a new platform in the largest Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli field that will help sustain production at current levels for some time -- and increased oil and gas production from the completion of ongoing projects at the Karabakh and Absheron fields.

Diversification prospects remain limited. Although Azerbaijan's transport and logistics sector benefits from the higher quality of physical infrastructure compared to regional peers in the South Caucasus, as well as potential for oil and gas transit revenue from other producers in the region, the size of the sector remains too small to have a significant impact on economic growth. Similarly, the agriculture sector is also dwarfed by the oil and gas sector, despite steady demand for Azerbaijan's food produce from large markets including Russia. The tourism sector, which had shown some potential before the coronavirus shock, may take time to recover even as borders gradually reopen.

The diversification prospects are in part limited by institutional and governance constraints, including weaknesses in rule of law and control of corruption as reflected in Azerbaijan's Worldwide Governance Indicator rankings, skills shortage, the dominance of large domestic holding companies that hinder entrepreneurship, and unresolved geopolitical tensions with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh -- despite last year's peace agreement -- that have the potential to weigh on foreign investor sentiment outside of the oil and gas sector.

The government aims to address some of these constraints, including through governance-related reforms with the help of development partners. Notably, the government has set up a holding company -- Azerbaijan Investment Holding (AIH) -- to better manage the SOEs, introduce stricter corporate governance, financial disclosure and audit rules, and enhance oversight through a supervisory board. The SOE reforms are being undertaken with support from international financial institutions such as the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank, and have the potential to raise the level of governance, transparency and financial health of SOEs, in turn reducing the contingent liability of the sector to the government. However, Moody's expects tangible effects to take time to materialise.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE CONSIDERATIONS

Azerbaijan's ESG Credit Impact Score is highly negative (CIS-4), primarily reflecting its high exposure to environmental risk and weak governance profile, while the exposure to social risk is moderate. Relatively weak institutions constrain the government's capacity to address ESG risks.

The exposure to environment risk is highly negative (E-4 issuer profile score), as the economy and government finances are highly susceptible to a global transition away from hydrocarbon fuels over the longer term. The hydrocarbon sector, which is currently dominated by oil production, accounts for around 90% of total goods exports and contributes to 60-70% of consolidated government revenue. While the government is emphasising economic diversification through its strategic road maps, tangible benefits will take time to materialise and are limited by human capital and institutional constraints.

The exposure to social risk is moderately negative (S-3 issuer profile score) as still low education and skills attainment constrain the development of the labour market, while rising inequality and restrictions on voice and accountability tend to be political flashpoints domestically. That said, the deployment of hydrocarbon revenue on public services including in healthcare, education and social infrastructure helps address social concerns.

The influence of governance is highly negative (G-4 issuer profile score), reflecting the lack of judicial independence and challenges in the rule of law, control of corruption, governance and transparency. These limit the effectiveness of institutions, prospects for economic diversification, and the resilience of the country to environment and social risks.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 15,076 (2019 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 2.5% (2019 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 2.4% (2019 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: 9.1% (2019 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: 9.1% (2019 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 32.9% (2019 Actual)

Economic resiliency: ba3

Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.

On 1 April 2021, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Azerbaijan, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's institutions and governance strength, have materially increased. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially increased. The issuer's susceptibility to event risks has not materially changed.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Upward pressure on the rating could develop if ongoing and further reforms were to increase the level of governance, transparency, and policy predictability, and in turn the quality of institutions beyond Moody's current expectations. Increased prospects for a more rapid decline in the government's debt burden and reduction in contingent liabilities over the medium term, for example through effective implementation of the fiscal rule and SOE reforms, would also be credit positive. Over time, marked progress in economic diversification that reduces the economy's high dependence on hydrocarbons would additionally put upward pressure on the rating.

The positive outlook signals that a rating downgrade is unlikely over the near term. The outlook would likely be changed to stable if there were signs of erosion in the credibility and effectiveness of the enhanced macroeconomic and fiscal policy framework that in turn raised the likelihood of external instability and/or a sustained increase in the government's debt burden. Banking sector weaknesses resurfacing and significantly raising contingent liability risks could also put downward pressure on the rating. A renewed escalation of the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh with a protracted negative impact on economic activity and government finances would in addition be credit negative.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Ratings Methodology published in November 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1158631. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The List of Affected Credit Ratings announced here are a mix of solicited and unsolicited credit ratings. Additionally, the List of Affected Credit Ratings includes additional disclosures that vary with regard to some of the ratings. Please click on this link https://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_ARFTL443692 for the List of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this Press Release and provides, for each of the credit ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the following items:

• Rating Solicitation

• Issuer Participation

• Participation: Access to Management

• Participation: Access to Internal Documents

• Disclosure to Rated Entity

• Endorsement

• Lead Analyst

• Releasing Office

For further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.

For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Moody's general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1243406.

At least one ESG consideration was material to the credit rating action(s) announced and described above.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Christian Fang
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077

Marie Diron
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
Client Service: 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd.
50 Raffles Place #23-06
Singapore Land Tower
Singapore 48623
Singapore
JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350
Client Service: 852 3551 3077

No Related Data.
© 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

Moodys.com