Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's changes outlook on Italy's Baa2 issuer rating to negative; affirms rating

Global Credit Research - 07 Dec 2016

Frankfurt am Main, December 07, 2016 -- Moody's Investors Service has today changed the outlook on Italy's Baa2 long-term issuer rating to negative from stable. At the same time, Moody's has affirmed Italy's long-term senior unsecured government bond rating at Baa2 and its short-term commercial paper rating at P-2.

The drivers for today's rating action are:

(i) the slow and halting progress on economic and fiscal reform in Italy, the prospects for which have diminished further following the 'no' vote in Sunday's constitutional referendum; and

(ii) the resulting rising risk that the reduction in Italy's large debt burden will be further postponed given subdued medium-term growth prospects and recent fiscal slippage, thereby prolonging the sovereign's exposure to unforeseen shocks.

Concurrently, Moody's has today maintained the local-currency and foreign-currency bond ceilings at Aa2. The local-currency and foreign-currency deposit ceilings remain unchanged at Aa2. The short-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings remain unchanged at P-1.

A full list of affected ratings is provided towards the end of this press release.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR CHANGING THE OUTLOOK TO NEGATIVE

FIRST DRIVER: DIMINISHED PROSPECTS FOR STRUCTURAL ECONOMIC AND FISCAL REFORM FOLLOWING THE REJECTION OF CONSITUTIONAL REFORM

The first driver of Moody's decision to change the outlook on Italy's Baa2 rating to negative relates to the diminished likelihood, following the 'no' vote in Sunday's constitutional referendum, that the Italian government will make meaningful further progress on the structural economic and fiscal reforms needed in order to stabilise the government's credit profile and improve its capacity to absorb shocks.

Real GDP growth in Italy has, on average, been flat for more than 15 years, and real productivity has barely increased in 20 years. Both nominal unit labour costs and Italy's real effective exchange rate show a marked loss of competitiveness. Past and present administrations have identified a series of reforms to address structural weaknesses in the Italian economy and in the government's finances. In Moody's opinion, these reforms should, if implemented in full, support Italy's credit profile by lifting growth over the medium term and supporting a reduction of the Italian government's very high debt burden. In pursuit of these objectives, the Italian government has in recent years introduced pension reform, reforms to the judicial system and to the public administration, as well as labour market reform and a programme of privatisation.

However, reforms implemented to date have had only a limited impact on Italy's medium-term growth and fiscal outlook. Many, such as the government's public sector reforms, have been only partially implemented, and others, such as pension reform and property tax reform, have been diluted or even abandoned. As a result, Italy's growth remains subdued and its growth prospects poor, and longer-term challenges to the government's fiscal strength persist. If sustained over time, low growth alongside high indebtedness will contribute to a gradual erosion in Italy's credit profile, and leave it increasingly exposed to shocks.

In Moody's view, the popular rejection of constitutional reform in Sunday's referendum poses a further threat to the achievement of these reforms, raising the risk of accelerating a weakening of Italy's credit profile. The contemplated changes were aimed at streamlining Italy's political processes which might have provided future Italian governments with the stability and continuity to implement further reforms. In addition, electoral dissatisfaction, illustrated by the referendum outcome, although varied in nature and objective, is likely to constrain further the country's economic and fiscal reform agenda. It also raises the possibility of further policy reversals, particularly if the outcome were to precipitate a general election.

SECOND DRIVER: RISING RISK THAT THE REDUCTION IN ITALY'S ELEVATED DEBT BURDEN WILL BE FURTHER POSTPONED, PROLONGING THE SOVEREIGN'S EXPOSURE TO SHOCKS

The second, closely related, driver of the change in Italy's rating outlook to negative is the rising risk that the stabilisation and reduction in Italy's large debt burden will be further deferred, given the likelihood that medium to long-term growth prospects will remain subdued and recent fiscal slippage.

Italy's subdued growth outlook leaves little scope for any material reduction in the country's very high debt burden over coming years, which represents a key credit weakness: Italy's debt- to-GDP ratio (133% of GDP forecast for 2016) exceeds both the median of Baa-rated countries as well as its euro area peers. In fact, Italy's debt ratio is large on a global scale: in Moody's sovereign rating universe, only Japan and Greece have higher debt ratios.

The high debt burden leaves the sovereign vulnerable to shocks, including not just lower-than-expected real GDP growth but also higher-than-expected fiscal deficits and worsening debt affordability. By lowering the probability that further meaningful reform will be undertaken, the outcome of the referendum increases the risk of a future shock to growth. It also shifts upwards the risk of a shock to debt affordability, particularly should the outcome signal, now or in its aftermath, an increase in support for a change in Italy's relationship with the euro area, and ultimately for membership of the euro. It may also increase the risk that contingent liabilities emanating from Italy's very weak banking sector crystallise on the government's balance sheet, should the 'no' vote lower the prospects of private capital being available to recapitalise the weaker parts of the sector.

Over the nearer term, Moody's believes that the prospects of further fiscal slippage also weigh upon Italy's fiscal outlook. According to European Commission forecasts, Italy's structural deficit is expected to deteriorate significantly as compared with both euro area and wider EU peers between 2015 and 2017. Italy's headline deficit is expected to be 2.4% of GDP in 2016, missing by some margin the target of 1.8% set in the 2015 Stability Programme. A combination of tax cuts and spending initiatives in 2016 have limited progress in reducing the deficit: particularly the government's reversal of expected hikes in VAT and other taxes, and its decision to abolish a property tax on first residences.

A key measure in the 2017 draft budget is the EUR7 billion allocated in additional spending for retirees on the lowest pensions, to be spread over three years with EUR1.9 billion disbursed in 2017, EUR2.5 billion in 2018, and EUR2.6 billion in 2019. This measure is a significant reversal of Italy's 2012 pension reform which introduced new minimum contribution requirements for early retirement. The 2017 draft budget also earmarks more than EUR6 billion, or 0.4% of GDP, in additional spending on migrants and to cover reconstruction costs following several major earthquakes. The European Commission has flagged concerns that Italy could deviate significantly from its medium term objective in 2017, stating that the structural deficit will increase to 1.6% in 2017 from the 1.2% estimated by the government for 2016, instead of declining, as previously expected by the government.

As a consequence, Moody's expects that Italy's debt burden will increase next year. The rating agency now expects Italy's debt to be slightly over 133% in 2017, and to decline only very slowly thereafter. The outcome of the referendum suggests that risks to the deficit and the debt burden remain high.

RATIONALE FOR AFFIRMATION OF THE Baa2 RATING

Moody's decision to affirm Italy's Baa2 rating reflects a number of continuing credit strengths, including the scale of Italy's economy and its elevated wealth levels. Italy has the third-largest economy in the euro area, after Germany and France, the fourth largest economy in the EU, after Germany, the UK and France, and its economy is significantly larger than that of Spain. Other factors underpinning the country's economic resilience are the relatively low indebtedness of Italy's private sector and the significant diversification of its economy. The high strength of Italy's institutions, whilst lower than some of the country's close peers, also supports the Baa2 rating.

Moreover, notwithstanding the shift in the balance of risk as a consequence of the 'no' vote, the affirmation reflects the assumption that the political process will nevertheless lead to a continuation of the reforms needed to lift growth, and that the debt burden will stabilise this year at around 133% of GDP and decline, albeit slowly, thereafter.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING DOWN / UP

Moody's would consider downgrading Italy's Baa2 issuer rating if it were to conclude that the country's economic prospects would remain poor over the medium term, that the stabilisation and reversal of its debt trajectory would continue to be deferred and remain weak, and that its ability to absorb shocks would continue to deteriorate. Proximate causes of a downgrade would include a material decrease in its primary surplus which the rating agency might conclude was unlikely to be reversed, a deterioration in the sovereign's funding conditions, or further shocks to the government's balance sheet, including the need for a significant recapitalisation of banks by the government. An emergence of elevated financial and debt market stress and/or a more turbulent political environment would also be credit negative.

The negative outlook implies that the probability of an upgrade is low. Moody's would consider stabilising, and ultimately upgrading, Italy's Baa2 issuer rating if a stronger consensus were to emerge in favour of the reforms needed to strengthen the economy's growth prospects. A sustained reversal of the upward trajectory of Italy's debt-to-GDP ratio against the backdrop of a resumption of significant growth would also be credit positive.

The referendum on constitutional reform required the publication of this credit rating action on a date that deviates from the previously scheduled release date in the sovereign release calendar, published on www.moodys.com.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 35,781 (2015 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 0.7% (2015 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 0.1% (2015 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -2.6% (2015 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: 1.6% (2015 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

Level of economic development: High level of economic resilience

Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.

On 06 December 2016, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Italy, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's economic fundamentals, including its economic strength, have not materially changed. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has not materially changed. The systemic risk in which the issuer operates has not materially changed. Other views raised included: The issuer's institutional strength/framework have decreased.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in December 2015. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Affirmations:

..Issuer: Italy, Government of

.... LT Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa2

.... Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-2

....Other Short Term (P)P-2

....Senior Unsecured MTN Program, Affirmed (P)Baa2

....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture , Affirmed Baa2

....Senior Unsec. Shelf , Affirmed (P)Baa2

Outlook Actions:

..Issuer: Italy, Government of

....Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Moody's considers a rated entity or its agent(s) to be participating when it maintains an overall relationship with Moody's. On this basis, the rated entity or its agent(s) is considered to be a participating entity. The rated entity or its agent(s) generally provides Moody's with information for the purposes of its ratings process.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Simon Griffin
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Deutschland GmbH
An der Welle 5
Frankfurt am Main 60322
Germany
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Yves Lemay
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office:
Moody's Deutschland GmbH
An der Welle 5
Frankfurt am Main 60322
Germany
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.