Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
04 Mar 2010
DIFC, March 04, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service has today taken a number of rating actions
on its seven government-related issuers (GRIs) owned by the Abu
Dhabi and United Arab Emirates (UAE) governments, thereby concluding
its review for downgrade initiated on 9th December 2009.
All seven companies saw their ratings downgraded, some by several
notches. Ratings affected by today's announcement include
- Mubadala Development Company (Mubadala): Aa3 / Prime-1,
stable outlook, from Aa2 / Prime-1
- International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC): Aa3
/ Prime-1, stable outlook, from Aa2 / Prime-1
- Tourism Development & Investment Company (TDIC): A1
, stable outlook, from Aa2
- Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (TAQA) to A3 / Prime-2,
stable outlook, from Aa2 / Prime-1
- Emirates Telecommunications Company (Etisalat) to Aa3,
stable outlook, from Aa2
- Dolphin Energy (Dolphin) to A1, stable outlook, from
- Aldar Properties (Aldar) to Ba1, negative outlook,
For a more detailed analysis of the individual companies affected by today's
rating action, please refer to their respective Credit Opinions
which will be published shortly on moodys.com.
As regards the ratings of Mubadala, IPIC and TDIC, which remain
within close proximity of Abu Dhabi's sovereign rating, Moody's
has concluded that these organisations are vehicles of government policy,
and are embedded in a framework of government funding and oversight that
enables them to achieve ratings close to the ratings of the sovereign
itself. All three entities remain heavily funded directly by the
government in addition to their own capital market and bank borrowing
activities. Indeed, the government has historically provided
the funding requirements of these entities that were not raised in the
debt markets, which is a business model expected to be followed
for the foreseeable future, and in the case of IPIC has a track
record of 25 years. This is both in regards to coverage of ongoing
and future investment requirements -- the majority of which originate
at government level -- and refinancing of existing debt as it falls
Furthermore, the government has formally assured Moody's that
it fully and unconditionally stands behind these entities for any debt
-- both principal repayments and debt servicing -- on a timely
basis in the event that the company were unable to provide for itself,
a policy that is also expected to remain in place for the foreseeable
Whilst this commitment is substantial and will continue to result in Moody's
considering it appropriate to reflect this support in meaningful uplifts
to the ratings of all three entities, Moody's has decided
to introduce a moderate distinction between their ratings and that of
the sovereign given that no explicit formal agreement exists obligating
the government to support them under all circumstances. This has
therefore resulted in the one notch downgrade in the ratings of Mubadala
and IPIC to Aa3 and a two notch downgrade in the ratings of TDIC to A1.
The distinction in the rating of TDIC relative to Mubadala and IPIC reflects
TDIC's weaker fundamental creditworthiness given its high exposure
to large-scale real estate projects that are in earlier stages
of development, albeit of very high strategic value. Going
forward, the ratings of all three companies are expected to continue
to move within one (Mubadala, IPIC) and two (TDIC) notches of the
Whilst the Abu Dhabi government also expressed strong statements of support
to TAQA, Dolphin and Aldar, Moody's has decided to introduce
a greater level of distinction between the ratings of these companies
and those of the government, thus resulting in downgrades.
TAQA, whose baseline credit assessment (BCA) -- the measure
of its fundamental creditworthiness excluding any exceptional support
from the government -- was unchanged at Ba1, continues to enjoy
high support according to Moody's methodology. However,
due to the lack of ongoing and regular funding from the government and
a greater commercial orientation of its business activities -- including
now substantial foreign engagement -- the government support factored
into its rating was lowered from the previously highest level.
Accordingly ratings have been lowered to A3. Whilst exceptional
and timely support remains high, we believe it cannot be regarded
as absolute. Moody's believes, and indeed ratings assume,
that TAQA's fundamental creditworthiness will strengthen over the
medium term, as the company focuses on de-leveraging its
balance sheet and consolidating its business profile rather than engaging
in further large-scale acquisitions. Moody's has also
withdrawn its provisional (P)Aa2 ratings on three proposed guaranteed
bonds at TAQA North. These bonds were never issued.
The assumed support of Dolphin, whose BCA was unchanged at Baa1,
was also lowered marginally to reflect the company's commercial
-- albeit highly strategic -- business activities. Dolphin's
rating is now A1. Both Dolphin, which sources and transports
gas from Qatar by pipeline to the UAE, and TAQA, which majority
owns the bulk of Abu Dhabi's power and water production assets,
are viewed as very strategic.
The downgrade of Aldar's ratings to Ba1 also reflects a lowering
of the support which Moody's assumes will be forthcoming to the
company over time. Although various government entities have assigned
large public infrastructure projects to Aldar in the past, with
a significant step-up in 2009, Aldar's portfolio still
contains a significant portion of commercial projects, which will
require financing beyond 2011 and for which the support mechanisms are
less certain. This uncertainty, as well as the exposure to
the volatile real estate market, have been expressed in the negative
outlook, which relates to the company's stand-alone
fundamental profile. This is unchanged at B2.
The support factored into Etisalat's ratings from the federal government
was adjusted from high to medium, thus bringing it in line with
other regional and international telecommunications companies.
This has resulted in its ratings being lowered to Aa3. The company's
stand-alone profile, which remains unchanged at A2,
continues to reflect its fairly benign regulatory and competitive environment,
and its solid financial profile, although we expect some of its
financial flexibility to be used for acquisitions abroad in line with
its growth strategy.
Moody's takes strong comfort from the Abu Dhabi government's
recent initiatives to establish greater control and oversight of its GRIs.
The recent establishment of a Debt Management Office (DMO) as part of
the Department of Finance represents the institutional cornerstone of
this initiative, thus requiring all GRIs to obtain approval for
debt financing from the DMO prior to issuance. It will also allow
the government to introduce greater day-to-day oversight
over a GRIs financial condition, including forthcoming liquidity
requirements, as well as allowing it to intervene in a timely manner,
where required. Accordingly, Moody's believes that
most rated GRIs are likely to see greater equity contributions from the
government, particularly those whose financial profiles are currently
characterised by high leverage.
All ratings are now stable with the exception of Aldar, whose negative
outlook incorporates ongoing medium term risks affecting its stand-alone
profile inherent with the real estate sector. Accordingly,
Moody's expects the government framework that governs the entities
-- and particularly regarding those that are rated closest to the
sovereign -- to remain unchanged for the foreseeable future.
Moody's also expects the government to continue to strengthen its
oversight over its GRIs via the newly established DMO, and to ensure
that the balance sheets of those entities that are currently stretched
are rectified over time. This is particularly the case for TAQA,
where we are assuming a gradual de-leveraging over the medium term.
Ratings also assume that entities rated closest to sovereign level maintain
timely access to government liquidity, which is particularly relevant
for IPIC, which faces substantial debt refinancing requirements
over the short term.
Today's rating action completes Moody's review of all seven
companies, which were placed on review for downgrade on 9th December
2009. Aldar's last rating action was on 28th January 2010,
when Moody's lowered its ratings given a deterioration of its BCA.
The principal methodology used in rating all entities affected by today's
rating action was "The Application of Joint Default Analysis to Government
Related Issuers", published in April 2005, which determines
ratings on the basis of a company's baseline credit assessment,
as well as credit enhancement for exceptional government support.
Accordingly, ratings were assigned by evaluating factors we believe
are relevant to the baseline credit assessment of the issuers, such
as i) the business risk and competitive position of the companies versus
others within its industry, ii) the capital structure and financial
risk of the companies, iii) the projected performance of the companies
over the near to intermediate term, and iv) management's track record
and tolerance for risk. These attributes were compared against
other issuers both within and outside of the companies' core industries
and ratings are believed to be comparable to those of other issuers of
similar credit risk. Other methodologies and factors that may have
been considered in the process of rating this issuer can also be found
in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory on Moody's website.
Philipp L. Lotter
Senior Vice President
Moody's Middle East Ltd.
Moody's concludes review of Abu Dhabi / UAE government-related issuers (GRIs)
David G. Staples
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.