Moodys.com
Close
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Terms of One-Time Website Use

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Related Issuers
Allfirst Preferred Asset Trust
Allfirst Preferred Capital Trust
Amarillo National Bank
Amegy Bank National Association
Amegy Corporation
American Express Bank, FSB
American Express Canada Credit Corp
American Express Company
American Express Credit Corporation
American Express National Bank
American Express O/S Credit Corporation Ltd.
American Express Travel Related Svcs Co., Inc
American Savings Bank, FSB
AmSouth Bancorporation
Associated Banc-Corp
Associated Bank, N.A.
Astoria Bank
Astoria Financial Corporation
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Banco Santander Puerto Rico
Bank of America Corporation
Bank of Hawaii
Bank of Hawaii Corporation
Bank of New York Mellon (Lux.) S.A. (The)
Bank of New York Mellon (The)
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (The)
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON SA/NV (Milan Branch)
Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV (The)
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Bank of the West
BankUnited, National Association
BanPonce Trust I
BB&T Corporation
BBVA USA
BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc.
BMO Financial Corp.
BMO Harris Bank National Association
BMW Bank of North America
BNY Mellon National Association
BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware
BOK Financial Corporation
BOKF, NA
Branch Banking and Trust Company
California Bank & Trust
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Capital One Financial Corporation
Capital One, N.A.
Central Fidelity Capital Trust I
Chittenden Corporation
Citigroup Inc.
Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania
Citizens Bank, N.A.
City National Bank
City National Corporation
Comerica Bank
Comerica Incorporated
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
Commerce Bank
CoreStates Capital II
CoreStates Capital III
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
Cullen/Frost Capital Trust II
Discover Bank
Discover Financial Services
E*TRADE Bank
Elavon Financial Services DAC
F.N.B. Corporation
Fifth Third Bancorp
Fifth Third Bank, Ohio
Fifth Third Capital Trust IV
Fifth Third Capital Trust IX
Fifth Third Capital Trust VIII
Fifth Third Capital Trust X
Fifth Third Capital Trust XI
Fifth Third Capital Trust XII
First Hawaiian Bank
First Horizon National Corporation
First Maryland Capital I
First Maryland Capital II
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.
First Midwest Bank
First Midwest Capital Trust I
First National Bank of Omaha
First National Bank of Pennsylvania
First Niagara Bank, N.A.
First Niagara Financial Group, Inc.
First Republic Bank
First Tennessee Bank, National Association
First Tennessee Capital II
First Tennessee Real Estate Securities Co Inc
First Union Capital II
First Union National Bank of Florida
Firstar Realty LLC
FirstBank Puerto Rico
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
FirstMerit Corporation
Frost Bank
FULTON BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Fulton Capital Trust I
Fulton Financial Corporation
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
Hancock Whitney Bank
Hancock Whitney Corporation
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
HSBC USA Capital Trust I
HSBC USA Capital Trust III
HSBC USA Inc.
Huntington Bancshares Capital Trust I
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Huntington Capital II
Huntington National Bank
INTRUST Bank, N.A.
INTRUST Financial Corporation
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
KeyBank National Association
KeyCorp
KeyCorp Capital I
KeyCorp Capital II
KeyCorp Capital III
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank
M&T Bank Corporation
M&T Capital Trust IV
M&T Capital Trust V
M&T Capital Trust VI
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Mellon Capital III
Mellon Capital IV
Mellon Funding Corporation
Morgan Stanley
MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
National City Bank
National City Bank of Indiana
National City Corporation
National Commerce Capital Trust I
National Penn Bancshares, Inc.
Nevada State Bank
New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
New York Community Bank
New York Community Capital Trust V
Northern Trust Company
Northern Trust Corporation
Northgroup Preferred Capital Corporation
NTC Capital I
NTC Capital II
Old National Bancorp
Old National Bank
P.R. Ind Tour Ed Med & Env Ctl Facs Fin Auth
People's United Bank, N.A.
People's United Financial Inc.
Phoenix Loan Holdings
PNC Bank, N.A.
PNC Capital Trust C
PNC Capital Trust F
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
PNC Funding Corporation
PNC Preferred Funding Trust I
PNC Preferred Funding Trust II
Popular Capital Trust I
Popular Capital Trust II
Popular Capital Trust III
Popular North America Capital Trust I
Popular North America, Inc.
Popular, Inc.
Regions Bank
Regions Financial Corporation
Regions Financing Trust IV
Regions Financing Trust V
Regions Financing Trust VI
Republic New York Corporation
Santander Bank, N.A.
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.
Silicon Valley Bank
SLM Corporation
SouthTrust Bank
SouthTrust Bank of Georgia, N.A. (Old)
Sovereign Capital Trust IV
Sovereign Capital Trust V
Sovereign Capital Trust VI
Sovereign Real Estate Investment Trust
State Street Bank and Trust Company
State Street Capital Trust I
State Street Capital Trust IV
State Street Corporation
SunTrust Bank
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
SunTrust Capital I
SunTrust Preferred Capital I
SunTrust Real Estate Investment Corporation
Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc.
Susquehanna Bank
SVB Capital II
SVB Financial Group
Synovus Bank
Synovus Financial Corp.
TCF National Bank
TD Bank US Holding Company
TD Bank, N.A.
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Texas Capital Bank, National Association
U.S. Bancorp
U.S. Bancorp (Old)
U.S. Bank National Association
U.S. Bank National Association, Canada Br.
United Bank
United Bank, Inc.
USB Capital IX
USB Realty Corp.
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Old)
Wachovia Capital Trust II
Wachovia Capital Trust III
Wachovia Corporation
Wachovia Corporation (Old)
Webster Bank N.A.
Webster Financial Corporation
Wells Fargo & Company
Wells Fargo Bank
Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Wells Fargo Canada Corporation
Wells Fargo Capital II
Wells Fargo Capital X
Whitney National Bank
Wilmington Trust Company
Wilmington Trust Corporation
Wilmington Trust, National Association
Zions Bancorporation
Zions Bancorporation, National Association
Rating Action:

Moody's concludes reviews on 63 US banks' ratings

14 May 2015

Actions conclude methodology-related reviews

NOTE: On July 29, 2015, the list of affected credit ratings accessible via hyperlink from this press release was corrected as follows: the Popular, Inc.’s New Rating Outlook and New Issuer Outlook rating was changed to Negative from Stable.

New York, May 14, 2015 -- Moody's Investors Service has concluded its rating reviews on 60 US regional banks and three custodian banks. These reviews were initiated on 17 March 2015 (see press release at https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-reviews-global-bank-ratings--PR_321005), following the publication of Moody's new bank rating methodology. (Moody's has not concluded its reviews on five large US global investment banks -- Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Moody's expects to conclude the reviews on these and other non-US global investment banks in the first half of 2015.)

Among the rating actions on the US banking groups that Moody's has taken are the following:

- 62 long-term bank deposit ratings upgraded, of which 10 remain on review for upgrade

- 31 short-term bank deposit ratings upgraded, 30 affirmed and one confirmed

- 38 bank issuer/senior unsecured debt ratings downgraded, five affirmed, two upgraded, two confirmed, nine remaining on review for downgrade and one remaining on review with direction uncertain

- 54 baseline credit assessments (BCAs) affirmed, five downgraded, one upgraded, one confirmed and one remaining on review for upgrade

In addition, of the 32 banking groups with rated holding company senior unsecured debt, 24 ratings were affirmed, three were upgraded, two were downgraded, two were confirmed and one remains on review for upgrade.

Moody's has also assigned Counterparty Risk (CR) assessments to the bank subsidiaries of 62 US banking groups, in line with its new bank methodology.

For its own business reasons, Moody's has withdrawn the outlooks for all of the junior instrument ratings for the banking groups covered in this press release. Most of the banks' subordinated debt ratings were affirmed and most of the holding companies' subordinated debt and hybrid securities ratings were upgraded as part of this rating action. For more information, please refer to "Moody's Investors Service's Policy for Withdrawal of Credit Ratings," available at moodys.com.

Outlooks, which provide an opinion on the likely rating direction over the medium term, are now assigned only to long-term deposit and issuer/senior unsecured debt ratings. Moody's has assigned stable outlooks to the long-term deposit ratings of 47 of the affected banks, negative outlooks to three and positive outlooks to two. Moody's has assigned stable outlooks to the bank issuer/senior unsecured debt ratings of 43 of the affected banks, negative outlooks to two and positive outlooks to two.

Please click on this http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_181169 for the List of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this Press Release and identifies each affected issuer.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The new methodology includes a number of elements that Moody's has developed to help accurately predict bank failures and determine how each creditor class is likely to be treated when a bank fails and enters resolution. These new elements capture insights gained from the crisis and the fundamental shift in the banking industry and its regulation.

In light of the new banking methodology, Moody's rating actions generally reflect the following considerations: (1) the "Very Strong -" macro profile of the US; (2) the banks' strong core financial ratios; (3) the protection offered to depositors compared to senior creditors, owing to depositor preference and substantial deposit funding, as captured by Moody's Advanced Loss Given Failure (LGF) liability analysis; and (4) the likelihood of government support for these institutions.

1) The "Very Strong -" macro profile of the US

The US banks benefit from operating in an environment with a very high degree of economic, institutional and government financial strength, and low susceptibility to event risk. Funding conditions benefit from the long-established Federal Home Loan Banking system, which is a proven, stable source of alternative secured funding for banks even in times of stress. Moody's view of the US operating environment also considers the high level of consumer debt and the system's periodic real estate asset bubbles, which weaken banks' credit conditions. Additionally, the stability of the banking system is periodically undermined by aggressive underwriting, as banks compete with a large, well-entrenched shadow banking system.

2) The banks' strong core financial ratios

The US banks' BCAs (median a3) also take into account their strong core financial ratios, including aggregate low problem loan ratios, respectable profitability ratios and strong liquidity metrics. The differences in BCAs reflect long-term execution in business plans, which has resulted in differences in performance volatility and in the banks' geographic reach, and sector and single name concentrations. (See below for the analytical considerations for some of the individual banks covered in this press release.)

3) Protection offered to depositors compared to senior and other creditors, as captured by Moody's Advanced LGF liability analysis

Because of the US operational resolution regime, Moody's applies its Advanced LGF analysis to US banks' liability structures under its new methodology. This analysis results in a "very low" loss given failure for US long-term deposits, in light of depositor preference and substantial deposit funding, as well as the protection offered by the amount of debt subordinated to deposits within banking groups, and has led to deposit rating upgrades for all of the US banks covered in this press release.

In contrast, banks' senior debt ratings were generally downgraded because of low volumes of senior debt and limited amounts of securities subordinated to it, reflecting a high expected loss severity in the event of resolution.

For more information on Moody's LGF analysis, please see Moody's "Banking -- Global How Resolution Frameworks Drive Our Creditor Hierarchies" at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1003760 (in addition to the methodology itself).

4) Low likelihood of government support

Generally, US bank ratings do not benefit from Moody's assumption of government support. Of the banks covered by today's announcement, the deposit ratings of three banking groups and the senior debt ratings of one bank were the only ratings positively affected by Moody's government support assumptions.

THE MOST COMMON RATING OUTCOME

Moody's affirmed the adjusted BCAs of the following 37 banking groups and upgraded their deposit ratings by two notches, but downgraded their rated bank issuer/senior unsecured debt ratings by one notch. Moody's also affirmed the rated senior bank holding company debt of the institutions in this group.

Moody's LGF analysis, which drove these rating actions, resulted in a "very low" loss given failure for long-term deposits, given depositor preference and substantial deposit funding, as well as the protection offered by the amount of debt subordinated to deposits in the banking group. In contrast, banks' senior debt ratings were generally downgraded because of low volumes of senior debt and limited amounts of securities subordinated to it, reflecting high expected loss severity in the event of resolution. Bank senior debt ratings are now generally aligned with bank holding company senior debt ratings, the latter of which were largely unaffected.

Amarillo National Bancorp, Incorporated

American Savings Bank, FSB

Associated Banc-Corp

Banco Santander Puerto Rico

BancWest Corporation

BankUnited, Inc.

BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.

BMO Financial Corp.

BMW Bank of North America

BOK Financial Corporation

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

City National Corporation

Comerica Incorporated

F.N.B. Corporation

First Horizon National Corporation

First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.

First National of Nebraska, Inc.

First Niagara Financial Group, Inc.

First Republic Bank

First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company

FirstMerit Corporation

Fulton Financial Corporation

Hancock Holding Company

INTRUST Financial Corporation

Northern Trust Corporation

Old National Bancorp

People's United Financial Inc.

Santander Holdings USA, Inc.

SunTrust Banks, Inc.

SVB Financial Group

TCF Financial Corporation

TD Bank US Holding Company

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

U.S. Bancorp

United Bankshares, Inc.

Webster Financial Corporation

Zions Bancorporation

OTHER RATING OUTCOMES

- Ten banking groups whose bank deposit and senior debt ratings were kept on review

American Express Company

Capital One Financial Corporation

Discover Financial Services

Fifth Third Bancorp

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

KeyCorp

M&T Bank Corporation

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation

PNC Financial Services Group Inc.

Susquehanna Bancshares Inc.

The long-term deposit ratings of these banking groups were upgraded by two notches and kept on review for upgrade. Except for Susquehanna, the banks' senior debt ratings were kept on review for downgrade. Susquehanna's bank senior debt rating was kept on review with direction uncertain pending the announced acquisition by BB&T Corporation. The reviews on the other nine banks will focus on the evolution of their balance sheets over the next few months, to see whether any changes in liability structures lead to an above-average uplift to the banks' deposit and senior debt ratings under Moody's Advanced LGF framework. Moody's expects to conclude these extended reviews by mid-September 2015.

- Three banking groups that benefit from Moody's government support assumptions

Wells Fargo & Company

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

State Street Corporation

For these three banking groups, Moody's assumes a going-concern resolution under which their bank subsidiaries would continue to operate while their holding companies would be placed into receivership by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This emerging framework, known as Single Point of Entry, is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's approach to implementing Title II of the Dodd Frank Act. As such, Moody's advanced LGF framework assumes losses post-failure of 8% of tangible banking assets for those firms given the lower expected losses associated with a going-concern resolution, as opposed to 13% of tangible banking assets for the other US regional and custody banks assuming a liquidation, which results in different rating notching compared with a typical regional bank.

In addition, Moody's ascribes various levels of government support to all three banks. Specifically, Moody's expects a moderate probability of government support for deposits, bank-level senior debt and operating obligations at both Wells Fargo and Bank of New York Mellon. On the other hand, Moody's ascribes a moderate probability of support for State Street's operating obligations, but a low probability of support for State Street's deposits and bank-level senior debt, with the difference between the two large global custodians being Bank of New York Mellon's prominence in the tri-party repo market.

Based on these assumptions, Wells Fargo's bank deposit rating was upgraded to Aa1, which is four notches above its a2 BCA. Its senior bank debt was upgraded to Aa2, or three notches above its BCA. Wells Fargo's A2 holding company senior debt rating was affirmed, as were the Prime-1 short-term obligation ratings at both the bank and holding company. The outlook on Wells Fargo's ratings is stable.

Bank of New York Mellon's bank deposit rating was upgraded to Aa1, which is three notches above its a1 BCA. Its senior bank debt was affirmed at Aa2, or two notches above its BCA. Bank of New York Mellon's A1 holding company senior debt rating was also affirmed, as were the Prime-1 short-term obligation ratings at both the bank and holding company. However, Moody's review for upgrade on the Aa2 long-term deposit ratings at Bank of New York Mellon's European subsidiaries, The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV and The Bank of New York Mellon (Lux.) S.A., continues, pending the receipt and analysis of the entities' audited year-end 2014 financial statements. In addition, the Aa2 issuer ratings of The Bank of New York Mellon (Lux.) S.A. and its Italian branch were placed on review for downgrade, as Moody's considers whether the severity of loss for non-deposit creditors under a European resolution will be greater than implied by the current ratings. If the ratings are downgraded, the downgrade will likely be limited to one notch. Moody's outlook on the ratings of all other entities in the Bank of New York Mellon family is stable.

State Street's bank deposit rating was upgraded to Aa2, which is two notches above its a1 BCA. However, its senior bank debt rating was downgraded to A1, which matches its BCA, and its holding company senior debt rating was downgraded to A2, one notch below its BCA. State Street's Prime-1 short-term obligation ratings at both the bank and holding company were affirmed. The outlook on State Street's ratings is stable.

- One banking group whose adjusted BCA was lowered

HSBC USA Inc.

Moody's affirmed the baa2 BCA of HSBC USA Inc.'s bank subsidiary, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., but lowered the adjusted BCA to a2 from a1. Moody's reduced the rating benefit that HSBC Bank USA receives from its ultimate parent, HSBC Holdings plc (Aa3 on review for downgrade). Moody's did not reduce its very high parental support assumption, but believes that a three-notch lift, as opposed to the previous very high four-notch lift, better represents this support assumption. This support assumption is based on HSBC USA's key role in the delivery of products and services to the HSBC group's global clients, as well as the parent's demonstrated willingness to support HSBC USA in recent years, in the form of periodic capital contributions. As a result of its LGF analysis, Moody's upgraded the bank's long-term deposit rating to Aa2 (three notches above the adjusted BCA) and its senior unsecured debt rating to Aa3 (two notches above the adjusted BCA). The outlook on the ratings is stable.

- One banking group whose BCA was confirmed

BB&T Corporation

Moody's confirmed BB&T Corporation's a1 BCA. The confirmation reflects BB&T's longstanding and embedded risk discipline, which manifests itself in (1) a very granular loan portfolio, (2) minimal leveraged lending exposure, (3) an avoidance of overheated markets and (4) a healthy level of recurring profitability. The confirmation of the BCA, combined with a wholesale funding structure weighted towards long-term unsecured debt, results in above-average uplift to BB&T's bank deposit and senior debt ratings under Moody's Advanced LGF framework. BB&T's bank deposit rating was upgraded to Aa1, which is three notches above its a1 BCA, and its senior bank debt was confirmed at A1, which matches its BCA. BB&T's holding company senior debt was confirmed at A2, one notch below its BCA. BB&T's Prime-1 short-term rating at the bank was affirmed and its holding company Prime-1 short-term rating was confirmed.. The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

- One banking group whose BCA was upgraded

Regions Financial Corporation

Moody's raised to baa2 from baa3 the standalone BCA of Regions Bank in light of the bank's enhanced risk management infrastructure and a decline in asset concentrations. Regions has strengthened its risk management personnel and reorganized and enhanced its committee structures over the past several years, with the aim of improving its long-term risk profile by successfully lowering its asset concentrations.

Nonetheless, Regions still faces earnings pressure because of the protracted low interest rate environment. The effectiveness of Regions' risk management in containing a rebuilding of asset risk will be a key driver of any future positive rating actions. Conversely, signs of weakening in underwriting discipline, such as loan growth that outpaces market opportunities or an increase in risk appetite for high-risk assets, could lead to negative rating actions. Regions' long-term deposit rating is A3 (two notches above its BCA), its short-term deposit rating is P-2, and its long-term issuer rating is Baa3 (one notch below the BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank. Regions Financial Corporation's senior debt and long-term issuer ratings are Baa3 (one notch below the BCA). The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

- Five banking groups whose BCAs were downgraded

Astoria Financial Corporation

Moody's lowered to baa2 from baa1 the standalone BCA of Astoria Bank, in light of the bank's inferior profitability, which is due to protracted low interest rates and a shrinking balance sheet, the latter being driven by its diminishing residential mortgage portfolio (primarily jumbo hybrid ARMs). This portfolio will continue to dwindle, given that a meaningful increase in interest rates is unlikely. Moreover, execution risk remains, as the company continues to build its commercial banking franchise (especially in multifamily lending). These risks are partially offset by the company's high capitalization and sound asset quality. Astoria Bank's long-term deposit rating is A3 (two notches above its BCA) and its issuer rating is Baa3 (one notch below the BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank. The bank's short-term rating is Prime-2. The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

Bank of Hawaii Corporation

Moody's lowered to a1 from aa3 the standalone BCA of Bank of Hawaii because of the bank's nearly total business concentration in Hawaii. The bank is vulnerable to local economic downturns, especially in the residential real estate market where it is concentrated. The a1 BCA reflects the bank's conservative underwriting and growth strategy in addition to its leading market position, and robust financial metrics. Bank of Hawaii's long-term deposit rating is Aa2 (two notches above its BCA) and its issuer rating is A2 (one notch below the BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank. The bank's short-term rating is Prime-1. The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

Moody's lowered to a1 from aa3 the standalone BCA of Commerce Bank because of the bank's loan and deposit concentrations in the Kansas City and St. Louis metropolitan areas. Commerce Bank's a1 BCA, which remains one of the highest among Moody's-rated US banks, reflects its conservative risk culture, longstanding stable earnings and strong capitalization and liquidity. Its geographic concentration is partially offset by significant business line diversity for a bank its size and sizeable non-interest income (which constituted approximately 39% of total net revenues, on average, during 2010-14). Commerce Bank's long-term deposit rating is Aa2 (two notches above its BCA) and its issuer rating is A2 (one notch below the BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank. The bank's short-term rating is Prime-1. The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

Moody's lowered to a1 from aa3 the standalone BCA of Frost Bank, in response to its business concentration in San Antonio and wholesale banking in Texas, especially its energy-related exposures. The a1 BCA reflects Frost Bank's conservative risk culture, strong credit loss history and strong liquidity profile. However, its energy exposure constitutes a sizeable 16% of its loan portfolio. Frost Bank has, throughout numerous cycles, successfully participated in the energy sector. One of its portfolio's strengths is that a large portion of the energy exposures consists of reserve-based loans that are secured by proven, developed and producing reserves. Frost Bank's long-term deposit rating is Aa2 (two notches above its BCA) and its issuer rating is A2 (one notch below the BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank. The bank's short-term rating is Prime-1. The outlook on all of the ratings is stable.

New York Community Bancorp, Inc.

Moody's lowered to baa1 from a3 the standalone BCA of New York Community Bank (NYCB), because of NYCB's significant commercial real estate concentration, which constitutes a very high percentage of its loans, as well as a high reliance on wholesale funding compared with its regional bank peers. Mitigating factors include the fact that over half of the portfolio is New York-based multifamily loans, where the company has an excellent asset quality record given its longstanding sound underwriting practices for that asset class. Furthermore, the bank's profitability has been stable because of consistently low credit losses. NYCB long-term deposit rating is A2 (two notches above its BCA), which is the standard rating configuration for a core deposit-funded US regional bank, and its short-term deposit rating is P-1. New York Community Bancorp's long-term issuer is Baa2. The outlook is stable.

- Two banking groups whose outlooks were changed to stable from negative

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

Moody's affirmed the a3 BCAs of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.'s bank subsidiaries, Citizens Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. As a result of its LGF analysis, Moody's upgraded the banks' long- and short-term deposit ratings to A1/P-1 from A3/P-2, but downgraded the banks' issuer ratings to Baa1 from A3. The rating outlook was changed to stable. Although the banks' profitability remains weaker than that of similarly rated peers, Moody's has observed no material change in their risk profiles as they have become fully independent from ownership by Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (Baa2 on review for downgrade) and seek to satisfy their new public shareholders. The current ratings reflect the banks' high capital ratios and solid asset quality compared with that of peers.

M&T Bank Corporation

Moody's changed to stable from negative the outlook on the ratings on M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and its subsidiaries. Regardless of the outcome of the pending acquisition of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (HCBK; unrated), which was announced in August 2012, MTB will maintain its strong credit profile. Execution risk related to the potential acquisition remains but is partially mitigated by (1) MTB's proven track record of acquiring and integrating banks, some of which have been sizeable; (2) HCBK's relatively simple thrift business model; and (3) MTB's familiarity with the New Jersey market, where it has been a lender for over 25 years.

In Moody's view, if the acquisition were to fall through, MTB would maintain its current credit profile. MTB's current ratings reflect the bank's strong asset quality performance, diversified regional consumer and commercial banking franchise, and improved capital and liquidity profiles. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company's long-term deposit rating is Aa3 (on review for upgrade) and its issuer rating is A2 (on review for downgrade). The bank's short-term deposit rating is Prime-1.

- Four banking groups whose bank issuer ratings were affirmed

E*TRADE Bank

First BanCorp

Popular Inc.

Synovus Financial Corporation

For these four banking groups, Moody's upgraded their deposit ratings by two notches and affirmed their bank issuer ratings. Prior to today's rating actions, these issuer ratings were positioned one notch below the banks' BCAs because they are non-investment grade. The current rating configuration is based upon the application of Moody's Advanced LGF liability analysis.

- National Penn Bancshares, Inc.'s Baa2 senior debt rating was affirmed

- Moody's upgraded SLM Corporation's cumulative preferred stock rating to B1(hyb) from B3(hyb) and non-cumulative preferred stock rating to B2(hyb) from Caa1(hyb) based upon the application of Moody's Advanced LGF liability analysis.

RATIONALE FOR COUNTERPARTY RISK ASSESSMENTS

Moody's has also assigned CR assessments to US banks. CR assessments are opinions of how counterparty obligations are likely to be treated if a bank fails, and are distinct from debt and deposit ratings in that they (1) consider only the risk of default rather than the likelihood of default and the expected financial loss incurred in the event of default and (2) apply to counterparty obligations and contractual commitments rather than debt or deposit instruments. The CR assessment is an opinion of the counterparty risk related to a bank's covered bonds, contractual performance obligations (servicing), derivatives (e.g., swaps), letters of credit, guarantees and liquidity facilities.

Moody's CR assessments for banks subject to liquidation or receivership resolution in an operational resolution regime, which includes all Title I US banks, are positioned one notch above the adjusted BCA. For banks subject to a going-concern resolution in an operational resolution regime, which include The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, State Street Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company, Moody's uses an Advanced LGF approach that takes into account the level of subordination in the bank's liability structure and an assumption of government support.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Upward rating momentum on any of the 63 banks could develop from (1) a reduction in concentration risk, (2) a sustained improvement in profitability and (3) materially stronger capital positions.

Downward rating pressure could emerge if (1) credit underwriting standards deteriorate noticeably, (2) current revenue and profitability pressures intensify and (3) macroeconomic environment deteriorates such that unemployment rises and the US real estate market weakens.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGIES

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Banks published in March 2015. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

The ratings of rated entity National Penn Bancshares, Inc. were initiated by Moody's and were not requested by this rated entity.

This rated entity (National Penn Bancshares, Inc.) or related third parties did not participate in the rating process. Moody's was not provided, for purposes of the rating, access to books, records and other relevant internal documents of the rated entity or related third party.

The below contact information is provided for information purposes only. Please see the ratings tab of the issuer page at www.moodys.com, for each of the ratings covered, Moody's disclosures on the lead analyst and the Moody's legal entity that has issued the ratings.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Joseph B Pucella
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Robert Franklyn Young
MD - Financial Institutions
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Moody's concludes reviews on 63 US banks' ratings
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​
Moodys.com