info

Yes No
Moodys.com
Terms of Use
REGULATORY AFFAIRS
.
Sustainability
CAREERS
.
ABOUT US
.
CONTACT US
HOME
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Can't read?
Try a new set
Send Cancel
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
OK
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
OK
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

 

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

 

Terms of One-Time Website Use

 

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

 

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

 

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

 

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

 

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Rating Action:

Moody's downgrades E-MAC NL 2002-I, confirms ratings of 10 other E-MAC RMBS;

10 Jul 2009

Approximately EUR5.2 billion and 37 classes of debt securities affected

Paris, July 10, 2009 -- Moody's Investors Service said today that following the execution of transaction amendments that introduced a back-up cash manager in all the Dutch E-MAC residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) transactions, it has concluded its review and confirmed the ratings of all the notes in the non-NHG transactions, except those of the E-MAC NL 2002-I, E-MAC NL 2003-I and E-MAC NL 2003-II transactions. A complete list of today's rating actions is included at the end of this press release.

Moody's has downgraded its ratings on all the notes in the E-MAC NL 2002-I transaction, following the 7 July 2009 announcement that as a result of the failure to obtain rating confirmations, the notes are due to be redeemed in full on 27 July 2009 and the publication of the step-up margins payable on the notes as from 27 July 2009, if they are not redeemed on that date. Moody's ratings do not address the likelihood of timely payments under this mandatory redemption. However, the rating agency believes that given the uncertainty regarding the obligation and ability of GMAC RFC Nederland B.V. (GMAC RFC NL) to provide funds for the notes to be redeemed on 27 July 2009, the transaction is now much likelier to move into enforcement, which will change the priority of payments and subordinate payments on each class of notes to the payments of the step up margins on higher ranking notes (see Moody's press release on 16 June 2009 and below for further details). As the ratings now incorporate the full probability of this scenario, as well as the execution of the back up cash management agreement, Moody's does not expect to further downgrade its ratings if the notes failed to be redeemed on 27 July 2009 and has therefore concluded its rating review.

Moody's has kept the ratings of the E-MAC 2003-I and E-MAC 2003-II transactions on review for possible downgrade, reflecting their exposure to a similar risk of a change in the priority of payments upon enforcement if they became subject to a mandatory redemption, as in the E-MAC NL 2002-I transaction. As the two E-MAC NL 2003 transactions now benefit from a back-up cash manager, Moody's rating review no longer reflects cash management related risks. Moody's expects to conclude its review after revising its assessment of the probability of a mandatory redemption of the notes and a subsequent enforcement scenario.

Moody's has also maintained the ratings of the four E-MAC NL NHG transactions on review for possible downgrade while it completes its analysis of transaction-specific features unrelated to cash management. The conclusion of this review will reflect methodology updates detailed in "Moody's Updated Approach to NHG Mortgages in Rating Dutch RMBS" published on 17 March 2009.

Moody's placed the ratings of all the notes in the E-MAC NL non-NHG transactions issued prior to April 2008 on review for possible downgrade on 3 December 2008 and those of the four Dutch E-MAC NHG transactions on 10 July 2008. As detailed in press releases issued then, Moody's rating review reflected the exposure of the affected transactions to the ability of GMAC RFC NL to fulfil its role as cash manager in these transactions, if it were to become insolvent. GMAC RFC NL is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Residential Capital, LLC, which was downgraded to Moody's lowest rating of C, on 20 November 2008. Moody's rating review of the 4 E-MAC NL NHG transactions was also prompted by NHG guarantee-related concerns.

In addition, on 16 June 2009, Moody's downgraded the ratings of all the notes in the E-MAC NL 2002-I and those of the non-senior classes of notes in the E-MAC NL 2003-I and 2003-II transactions, due to structural features that Moody's believed might affect the likelihood of an event of default (E-MAC 2002-I) and the severity of potential losses to noteholders after the notes are subject to a step-up of interest. A step-up of interest occurs if the notes remain outstanding after the relevant put option date. All the Dutch E-MAC NL transactions are subject to a similar put option process and interest step-up mechanism but Moody's believes that not all of them are exposed to the same credit risks as the affected transactions, due to different structural features (see press release issued on 16 June 2009 and below for further details).

On July 10 back-up agreements for the role of issuer administrator (performing the tasks generally associated with a cash manager), were entered into by the relevant parties in all the E-MAC NL transactions that closed prior to April 2008. Under these agreements, ATC Financial Services B.V. (ATC) must step in as third-party cash manager, within a short time from the termination of GMAC RFC NL's role as cash manager. In particular, ATC has committed that within two business days from termination of GMAC RFC NL's role as cash manager, it would take over GMAC RFC NL's obligations with respect to payments to be made under the swap and interest payments under the notes. As the E-MAC NL 2003-I and E-MAC NL 2003-II and the four E-MAC NL NHG transactions are also subject to the back-up agreements, Moody's continued review is no longer driven by the risk of a cash management disruption.

Moody's notes that in the two most recent Dutch E-MAC transactions issued in 2008 (E-MAC NL 2008-II and E-MAC NL 2008-IV), ATC is the appointed third-party issuer administrator performing most of the cash management functions, although GMAC RFC NL still performs administrative activities at the programme level. Despite their residual exposure to GMAC RFC NL, the ratings of these transactions have not been downgraded or placed on review due to the limited scope of GMAC RFC NL's role.

In all of the E-MAC NL transactions, the interest rate on any notes not redeemed at the put option date is subject to a step up. Because this step-up interest (referred to as the "extension margin") is calculated with reference to market prevailing rates, it can be significantly higher than the current interest rate level. This was evidenced by the extension margins published on 7 July 2009 for E-MAC NL 2002-I (for instance, for Class A, the extension margin is 6.87% per annum). The step-up component of the interest on the notes, which is unrated by Moody's, is generally deeply subordinated in the waterfall. In E-MAC NL 2002-I and the EMAC NL 2003-I and 2003-II transactions, in a post-enforcement scenario, the step-up component of the interest on each class of notes would rank higher in the priority of payments than the interest and principal on more junior notes, which could significantly affect the severity of losses on the less senior notes in the transaction. In addition, in that scenario, the step-up component of the interest on each class of notes -- including the senior notes -- would also rank higher than principal payments on the same class of notes, which would affect the severity of principal losses for that class.

While Moody's rating downgrades for E-MAC NL 2002-I on 16 June 2009 incorporated the uncertainty as to the outcome of the credit agency confirmation process and the potential consequences of a mandatory redemption, today's downgrades incorporate the much higher likelihood of an enforcement process actually occurring after 27 June 2009, given the uncertainty of whether GMAC RFC NL will provide funds to redeem the notes on that date under the mandatory redemption announced on 7 June 2009. However, it should be noted that with respect to principal payments, Moody's ratings address the ultimate payment at par on or before the rated final legal maturity date and not the likelihood of timely payments under a mandatory redemption.

Moody's ratings address only the credit risks associated with the transaction. Other risks have not been addressed, but may have a significant effect on yield to investors.

The principal methodology Moody's used in rating these transactions is described in the Rating Methodology reports: "Moody's Updated MILAN methodology for Rating Dutch RMBS", published on 16 March 2009, and "Cash Flow Analysis in EMEA RMBS: Testing Structural Features with the MARCO Model", published in January 2006, which can be found at www.moodys.com in the Credit Policy & Methodologies directory, in the Ratings Methodologies subdirectory. Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process of rating these transactions can also be found in the Credit Policy & Methodologies directory.

For further information, please refer to www.moodys.com or contact Moody's Client Service Desk on +44-20 7772 5454.

DETAILED LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

E-MAC NL 2002-I B.V.

Class A, downgraded to Baa1; previously on 18 June 2009 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, downgraded to Ca; previously on 18 June 2009 downgraded to Ba1 and maintained under review for possible downgrade

Class C, downgraded to C; previously on 18 June 2009 downgraded to Ba2 and maintained under review for possible downgrade

Class D, downgraded to C; previously on 18 June 2009 downgraded to B2 and maintained under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC NL 2004-I B.V.

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at A2; previously on 03 December 2008 A2 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at Baa2; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa2 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC NL 2004-II B.V.

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at Baa1; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa1 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC NL 2005-I B.V.

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at Baa1; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa1 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC NL 2005-III B.V.

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at Baa1; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa1 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC NL 2006-II B.V.

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at Baa1; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa1 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC Program B.V./ Compartment NL 2006-III

Class A1, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class A2, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC Program B.V./ Compartment NL 2007-I

Class A1, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class A2, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC Program B.V. / Compartment NL 2007-III

Class A1, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class A2, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa2; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa2 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at A2; previously on 03 December 2008 A2 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC Program II B.V. / Compartment NL 2007-IV

Class A, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at A2; previously on 03 December 2008 A2 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class D, confirmed at Baa3; previously on 03 December 2008 Baa3 placed under review for possible downgrade

E-MAC Program III B.V. / Compartment NL 2008-I

Class A1, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class A2, confirmed at Aaa; previously on 03 December 2008 Aaa placed under review for possible downgrade

Class B, confirmed at Aa2; previously on 03 December 2008 Aa2 placed under review for possible downgrade

Class C, confirmed at A2; previously on 03 December 2008 A2 placed under review for possible downgrade

A list of these actions including ISIN identifiers may be found at:

Excel: http://www.moodys.com/cust/getdocumentByNotesDocId.asp?criteria=PBS_SF172891

For more information please see www.moodys.com.

Frankfurt
Marie-Jeanne Kerschkamp
Managing Director
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Deutschland GmbH
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Paris
Ariel Weil
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's France S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Moody's downgrades E-MAC NL 2002-I, confirms ratings of 10 other E-MAC RMBS;
No Related Data.
© 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​
Moodys.com