Moodys.com
Close
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Terms of One-Time Website Use

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Rating Action:

Moody's downgrades El Salvador's government ratings to B1, places ratings on review for further downgrade

 The document has been translated in other languages

11 Aug 2016

New York, August 11, 2016 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded El Salvador's issuer and debt ratings to B1 from Ba3 and placed the ratings on review for further downgrade.

The key driver for the downgrade to B1 is the continued inability of the authorities to arrest the upward trend in government debt amid persistently high fiscal deficits and low economic growth.

Moody's review for further downgrade will assess the rising government liquidity risks derived from persistently high and rising short-term debt in a relatively shallow domestic market, and the legislative impasse that has so far this year prevented the approval of long-term debt issuance to retire short-term paper. The review for further downgrade will allow Moody's to better assess rising liquidity risks in El Salvador's credit profile and explore possible scenarios that could materialize, depending on the government's policy response and the outcome of negotiations between the main political parties in the Legislative Assembly to normalize the funding situation and, ultimately, avoid a credit event.

Moody's would downgrade El Salvador's B1 ratings if the review were to conclude that measures are only sufficient to temporarily curb the increase in liquidity risks. In this case, the most likely rating outcome is a one-notch downgrade. However, if government liquidity risks continue to rise unabated and an agreement to approve long-term debt issuance to retire short-term debt remains unlikely, a downgrade of more than one notch would be possible.

El Salvador's long-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings were lowered to Ba2 from Ba1. Short-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceiling remain unchanged at NP.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR DOWNGRADING TO B1 FROM Ba3

GOVERNMENT EFFORTS HAVE FALLEN SHORT IN ADDRESSING THE RISING DEBT TREND

Moody's decision to downgrade El Salvador to B1 was driven by the continued inability of the country's authorities to arrest the upward trend in government debt amid persistently high fiscal deficits and low economic growth.

El Salvador's government debt ratios have reported an upward trend since 2009 driven by fiscal deficits of around 3.6% of GDP, which, in addition to pension-related expenditures, have been due to an expanding wage bill and untargeted subsidies. Moody's expects debt-to-GDP to surpass 60% by year-end 2016. GDP growth of only 2% implies that a stabilization of debt ratios requires the authorities to implement aggressive fiscal consolidation measures involving both revenues and expenditures. Political gridlock in the Legislative Assembly and a lack of a majority by the ruling party make this task particularly challenging.

As a result of a slow but steady rise in debt metrics, government finances are weaker than those of other sovereigns in the Ba category. El Salvador's debt-to-GDP ratio is 15 percentage points higher than the Ba median projected to be 47% in 2016. The government's interest burden (interest payments-to-government revenues) is 4 percentage points higher than the Ba median (12.7% vs. 8.7%). Low GDP growth complicates the government's fiscal consolidation efforts given average annual growth of 1.7% over the past decade, which compares to 3.7% of the median for Ba-rated peers over the same period.

If current fiscal and economic trends continue, without a fiscal or pension reform, we project the gradual rise in the debt-to-GDP ratio to continue and to approach 70% by 2020.

The affirmation of the Ba3 ratings last November incorporated Moody's expectation that the government would take steps to reduce fiscal deficits and stabilize rising debt ratios. The rating agency expected this would be supported by approval of a pension reform. Since then, the government has been unable to reach an agreement with the opposition, and its efforts were sidetracked because the ruling party (FMLN) lost support from its main ally GANA, the third largest party in the Legislative Assembly. Without GANA's votes, it is unlikely the FMLN will obtain the necessary votes to approve a pension reform given strong opposition from ARENA, the opposition party with the most seats in the Assembly.

El Salvador's pension system was privatized in 1998 and moved to a defined-contributions system. However, the system partly operates as a pay-as-you-go system with a portion of current pension obligations financed by the government's budget, while most of the contributions accrue to the private pension funds for future pension payments. Moreover, legislative decisions over the past decade to increase benefits under the private system, to make it match the old system, have increased the financial costs of the transition period. According to government estimates, pension-related government expenditures have hovered at around 1.8% of GDP during 2005-15 and are expected to remain roughly the same during the next decade. The accumulation of these annual pension outlays has led to a steady increase in debt issued to fund pensions, which now amounts for 13.8% of GDP.

Pension expenditures represent roughly half of the fiscal deficit. Without addressing pension-related fiscal costs, any single fiscal effort will have only a limited effect in arresting the debt trend.

RATIONALE FOR THE REVIEW FOR FURTHER DOWNGRADE

Moody's decision to initiate a review for further downgrade of El Salvador's B1 rating is intended to allow the rating agency to better assess rising liquidity risks in the country's credit profile. The review also offers Moody's the opportunity to explore possible scenarios that could materialize depending on the government's policy response and the outcome of negotiations between the main political parties in the Legislative Assembly that could ease funding pressures and, ultimately, avoid a credit event.

The government of El Salvador faces increased liquidity risks, given the continued rise of short-term government paper (LETES) which currently stands above historical thresholds, challenging local banks' capacity and willingness to absorb additional amounts. As the government has been unable to secure approval from the Legislative Assembly to issue long-term debt, it has been forced to increasingly finance itself with short-term debt. As a two-thirds majority vote in the Legislative Assembly is required to approve long-term debt issuance, the ruling party (FMLN) needs support from the main opposition party (ARENA) to get approval.

Previous administrations had always been able to broker an agreement with the opposition to issue long-term debt and retire LETES when the outstanding amount reached $800 million. Since January 2016, LETES surpassed the $800 million mark, a level at which refinancing conditions began to deteriorate. In March, LETES reached a record high of $937 million and then declined to $857 million in May as the government restrained spending and benefited from strong revenue collection.

To date, there are no indications that an agreement between the two main parties will be reached soon.

WHAT COULD RESULT IN A FURTHER DOWNGRADE

Moody's would downgrade El Salvador's B1 rating if the review were to conclude that an agreement between the political parties, or other government measures, are only sufficient to temporarily curb the increase in liquidity risks, provide temporary breathing room to government finances, and therefore delay a comprehensive agreement on fiscal and pension reforms. The most likely rating outcome in that instance would be a one-notch downgrade. However, if government liquidity risks continue to rise unabated and an agreement to approve long-term debt issuance to retire short-term debt is unlikely before the end of the year, a downgrade of more than one notch is possible.

WHAT COULD CONFIRM THE RATING AT THE CURRENT LEVEL

Given Moody's decision to initiate a review for downgrade, an upward movement in the rating is unlikely at this point in time. El Salvador's rating could be confirmed at B1 if the government is able to materially reduce government liquidity risks and/or if it is granted Legislative Assembly's approval for issuance of long-term government debt to retire LETEs. In addition, a credible and detailed plan for addressing the government's persistent budget deficits and rising debt ratio, agreed between the main political parties or under an IMF program, would support a rating confirmation.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 8,303 (2015 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 2.5% (2015 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 1% (2015 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -3.3% (2015 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -3.6% (2015 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 59.9% (2015 Actual)

Level of economic development: Low level of economic resilience

Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.

On 09 August 2016, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the El Salvador, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's institutional strength/framework, have materially decreased. The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, has materially decreased. The issuer has become increasingly susceptible to event risks.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in December 2015. Please see the Ratings Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Ariane Ortiz-Bollin
Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Atsi Sheth
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​​​
Moodys.com