Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's downgrades El Salvador's issuer rating to Caa1 from B3 and changes outlook to stable from negative

 The document has been translated in other languages

Global Credit Research - 13 Apr 2017

New York, April 13, 2017 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded El Salvador's issuer and senior unsecured debt ratings to Caa1 from B3 and changed the outlook on the issuer rating to stable from negative.

The key drivers of the downgrade to Caa1 are:

1) The recent missed payments on pension-related bonds signal a higher risk that the political impasse in the Legislative Assembly could lead to missed payments on government debt obligations

2) The failure to reach an agreement to issue long-term debt raises government liquidity risks and tests local banks' capacity to absorb additional short-term debt, which is already at record high levels.

The stable outlook reflects our view that the Caa1 rating captures the balance of risks to El Salvador's sovereign credit profile.

El Salvador's long-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings were lowered to B2 from B1. Short-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings remain unchanged at NP.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATIONALE FOR DOWNGRADE TO Caa1 FROM B3

POLITICAL RISK RAISES DEBT REPAYMENT RISK

On April 7, the trust fund created by El Salvador's government to finance obligations to the pension system (Fideicomiso de Obligaciones Previsionales, FOP) began to miss payments on pension certificates (Certificados de Inversion Previsional, CIP). The pension certificates are held by private and public sector pension funds.

It is our understanding that the pension certificates do not carry a sovereign guarantee. Therefore, based on the available information, we do not consider the missed payments on the pension certificate to be a default by the government of El Salvador under Moody's definition of default.

However, this credit event constitutes the first time a decision has been made to miss a debt-related payment. Prior to this, the government had made all debt related payments, while building up arrears in other non-debt payments.

The missed payment occurs in the context of a political impasse between the ruling party and the main opposition party in the Legislative Assembly. Disagreements between the two parties have obstructed fiscal policy and government debt management, leading to rising arrears and the recent missed payment. We see the missed payment on the pension fund obligations as a signal that risks for government debt payments have risen.

GOVERNMENT LIQUIDITY RISKS CONTINUE TO RISE

The government is required to obtain a two thirds majority approval in the legislative assembly to issue long term debt. This has been a long standing feature of El Salvador's debt management framework. However, over the past year, the ruling party (FMLN) has failed to secure approval to issue long-term debt from the main opposition party (ARENA), due to disagreements over policy priorities and an increasingly acrimonious political relationship.

The government has instead financed itself with short-term debt (LETES). In January 2016, LETES surpassed the $800 million mark, a level at which refinancing conditions began to deteriorate, reflecting the limited absorption capacity of the relatively shallow domestic market. By November 2016, banks began to slowly reduce their exposure to LETES, suggesting tightening liquidity conditions for government debt. Short-term government paper outstanding is now about $1.06 billion, challenging local banks' capacity to absorb additional amounts.

While it is unlikely that banks would stop rolling over LETES, which could lead to a default on short-term debt, the longer the political impasse prevents the issuance of long term debt, the greater the liquidity pressure in the short term debt market.

The ruling party and the opposition are currently in negotiations to issue long-term debt to retire short-term debt. Should such an agreement be reached, it would alleviate near term liquidity pressures. However, these pressures would likely return. For instance, last November the Legislative Assembly did reach an agreement to authorize issuance of $550 million in long-term debt and also approved a Fiscal Responsibility Law (FRL) which, at that time, represented an important break to a political impasse that had been ongoing for a year.

The November agreement allowed the government to retire only $307 million of LETES and pay 2016 arrears. The potential reduction in LETES is insufficient to materially lower liquidity risks as the total outstanding amount will remain at around $800 million. If no additional long-term debt issuance is authorized (the government's original request was $1.2 billion) the authorities will be forced to prioritize payments and will likely run up arrears.

Even though negotiations are ongoing, there have been multiple setbacks, and it has become increasingly clear that the two political parties' positions are very difficult to reconcile. Negotiations revolve around amending the 2017 budget to include underestimated spending and on how to comply with the FRL, which mandates a reduction in non-financial public sector deficit by at least three percentage points of GDP over the next three years. Reaching an agreement will likely become even more difficult in the second half of 2017 as campaigns for legislative elections, which are scheduled for March 2018, intensify.

RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects our view that the Caa1 rating captures the balance of risks to El Salvador's credit profile. It is our baseline assumption that under increased financial strain the government will prioritize government debt service over other expenses. However, the risks that political considerations could change priorities have risen.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN

Upward pressure on the Caa1 rating would come from a material reduction in political and government liquidity risks. Such a reduction could stem from an additional agreement between the FMLN and ARENA to approve a second tranche of long-term debt issuance, sufficient to retire a significant portion of short-term debt paper, and prevent a recurrence of future political disagreements raising debt repayment risks. Fiscal adjustment that reduced borrowing requirements would also be positive for the credit profile.

Downward pressure on El Salvador's Caa1 ratings would emerge if we no longer expected that the government would prioritize debt service over other payments and saw more imminent pressures towards a credit event that caused losses to bond holders that are higher than those consistent with a Caa1 rating. Such a change in view would occur if an agreement to access long-term funding remains elusive for a prolonged period. Even though Moody's does not rate El Salvador's short-term government debt, further escalation of financial stress related to LETES would raise the credit risks related to the government's long-term debt.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 8,620 (2015 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): 2.4% (2016 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): 1.1% (2016 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -3.2% (2016 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -2.5% (2016 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: 59% (2016 Actual)

Level of economic development: Low level of economic resilience

Default history: No default events (on bonds or loans) have been recorded since 1983.

On 13 April 2017, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the El Salvador, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's governance and/or management, have materially decreased. The issuer has become more susceptible to event risks.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in December 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this credit rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Ariane Ortiz-Bollin
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Atsi Sheth
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.