Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Enter the above code here:
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's downgrades Italian banks

Global Credit Research - 16 Jul 2012

Actions follow Italy's downgrade to Baa2, negative outlook

Milan, July 16, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded by one to two notches the long-term debt and deposit ratings for 10, and the issuer ratings for 3, Italian financial institutions, prompted by the weakening of the Italian government's credit profile, as captured by Moody's downgrade of Italy's government bond rating to Baa2 from A3 on 13 July 2012. The long-term debt and deposit ratings of one bank were affirmed.

Please click this link (http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_143798) for the list of Affected Credit Ratings. This list is an integral part of this press release and identifies each affected issuer. For additional information on bank ratings, please refer to the webpage containing Moody's related announcements: http://www.moodys.com/bankratings2012.

Details of the ratings rationale for each affected bank is provided below.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Today's actions follow the weakening of the Italian government's credit profile, as captured by Moody's downgrade of Italy's government bond rating to Baa2 from A3, with a negative outlook. For more details on the rationale for the sovereign downgrade, refer to the press release "Moody's downgrades Italy's government bond rating to Baa2 from A3, maintains negative outlook", published on 13 July, 2012 (http://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-downgrades-Italys-government-bond-rating-to-Baa2-from-A3--PR_250567).

The ratings declined by one notch for 7 of the affected institutions, and by two notches for remaining 6. The short-term ratings for 3 banks have also been downgraded by one notch, triggered by the long-term ratings changes.

Along with the increase in the risk of sovereign bond defaults, the downgrade of Italy's long-term ratings to Baa2 also indicates a similarly increased risk that the government might be unable to provide financial support to its banks in financial distress. As a consequence, Italian banks with standalone ratings at or close to the Baa2, and higher debt and deposit ratings as a result of an expectation of systemic support , have seen the support uplift in their debt ratings reduced by one or two notches.

The reduced expectation of systemic support that prompted today's rating actions follows downgrades of several Italian banks taken on 14 May, 2012 ("Moody's downgrades Italian banks; outlooks remain negative" http://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-downgrades-Italian-banks-outlooks-remain-negative--PR_244732). The revised standalone credit assessments announced on 14 May were set to be resilient to a degree of further stress, and reflected the banks' substantial exposures to the Italian economy and the Republic's credit worthiness. As a result, those earlier actions largely limited the extent of the rating actions taken today to changes in the credit enhancement associated with systemic support. Accordingly, the standalone ratings, in almost all cases, proved resilient to the sovereign downgrade.

Banks are typically rated on a standalone basis no higher than the government's rating due to multiple channels of shared exposure and contagion. Limited exceptions are possible where there is external support or where a bank has substantial assets, revenues and financing resources domiciled outside their home environment, and where direct and indirect credit exposure to the sovereign is limited. However, Italian banks' substantial exposure to the domestic economy -- coupled with high direct exposure to sovereign debt -- have resulted in standalone credit assessments that are no higher than the sovereign rating. As a result of these considerations, any further sovereign downgrade would likely result in a commensurate lowering of many banks standalone and debt and deposit ratings (see Moody's Sector Comment "How Sovereign Credit Quality May Affect Other Ratings" published 13 February, 2012).

For the two affected Government-related issuers (GRIs), Cassa Depositi e Prestiti and Ismea, their debt and issuer ratings were lowered to the same rating level as the sovereign given their high default correlation with the Italian government. For further details of the rating actions, see the specific sections for the two GRIs later in the press release.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATINGS UP/DOWN

Upgrades of the banks' ratings are unlikely in the near term, given the negative outlooks on the ratings as well as the sovereign's rating. However, a limited amount of upwards rating pressure could develop if any bank substantially improves its credit profile and resilience to the prevailing conditions. This may occur through increased standalone strength, e.g. bolstered capital and liquidity buffers, work-out of asset quality challenges or improved earnings. Improved credit strength could also result from external support; for example, through a change in ownership or the receipt of extra capital or liquidity injections.

Several factors could exert further downwards rating pressure, such as (i) increasing funding stress and reliance on central bank support, which could raise pressure on banks to deleverage, with adverse consequences for asset quality; (ii) a prolonged recession, which could similarly further exacerbate already adverse asset-quality trends and impair capital; or (iii) further weakening of the Italian government's credit strength.

BANK-SPECIFIC RATING CONSIDERATIONS

UniCredit

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2, in line with the Italian sovereign rating, from A3. The C- BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa2 was affirmed at its current level, which is in line with the sovereign rating. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks. Moody's notes that despite UniCredit's substantial international activities, its important exposure to its domestic market means that its standalone rating is constrained by the level of the sovereign rating, as is the case for other Italian banks rated by Moody's.

UniCredit Leasing

UniCredit Leasing's long and short-term issuer ratings were downgraded to Baa3/Prime-3 from Baa2/Prime-2. The outlook remains negative and reflects that of the parent UniCredit (Baa2; C-/baa2, negative).

According to Moody's, the downgrade follows the downgrade of the parent bank, which reduces the ratings uplift for the issuer rating, despite Moody's view of a very high probability of parental support from UniCredit.

Intesa Sanpaolo

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2, in line with the Italian sovereign rating, from A3, thus eliminating the notch of systemic support applied previously. The standalone BFSR was affirmed at C-, however this now maps to a standalone credit assessment of baa2 (previously baa1), also in line with the sovereign rating. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign. Moody's notes that Intesa's business is almost entirely domestic in nature, and as such its standalone rating is constrained by the sovereign rating, resulting in the lowering of the standalone credit assessment.

Banca CR Firenze (Carifirenze)

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2 with negative outlook. This is in line with both the parent's (Intesa Sanpaolo) and the sovereign's ratings. This rating action eliminated the two notches of parental support from Intesa Sanpaolo, previously incorporated into CR Firenze's long-term deposit and debt ratings, given the now lower long-term rating of the parent, which forms the basis for assessing parental support. The bank's C- BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa2, was not affected. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks.

Banca IMI

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2 from A3. This is in line with both the parent's (Intesa Sanpaolo) and the Italian sovereign's ratings. This rating action eliminated the two notches of parental support from Intesa Sanpaolo, previously incorporated into Banca IMI's long-term deposit and debt ratings, given the now lower long-term rating of the parent, which forms the basis for assessing parental support. The bank's C- BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa2, was not affected. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks.

Banca Monte Parma

Banca Monte Parma's long-term deposit rating was downgraded to Baa2 from Baa1, directly following the downgrade of the ratings of its parent Intesa Sanpaolo. This rating action reduces to one from two notches the level of parental support from Intesa Sanpaolo, given the now lower long-term rating of the parent, which forms the basis for assessing parental support. The bank's D+ BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa3, was unaffected. The outlook on all ratings remains negative, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks.

Banca Nazionale del Lavoro

Banca Nazionale del Lavoro's long-term Baa2 deposit rating was affirmed. The other ratings and the negative outlook are unaffected.

The affirmation is based on Moody's assessment of a very high probability of parental support from BNP Paribas (A2; BFSR C-/BCA baa2, stable) and a high probability of systemic support, which results in two-notches of rating uplift from the ba1 standalone credit assessment. The uplift has not changed and now stems from parental support only -- from one notch of parental support and one notch of systemic support previously -- following the downgrade of Italy's rating.

Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza (Cariparma)

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2, in line with the Italian sovereign rating, from Baa1, thus eliminating the current one notch of systemic support. The bank's C- BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa2, was not affected. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks. Our high expectation of parental support from Credit Agricole(CASA) does not actually result in any uplift for the banks' ratings, given that Cariparma's standalone credit assessment of baa2 is in line with CASA's adjusted standalone credit assessment of baa2.

Banca Popolare Friuladria (Friuladria)

The long-term deposit and debt ratings were downgraded to Baa2, in line with the Italian sovereign rating, from Baa1, so reducing parental support from its parent, Cariparma, to one notch, given the now lower long-term deposit rating of the parent, which forms the basis for assessing parental support. The bank's D+ BFSR, mapping to a standalone credit assessment of baa3 was not affected. The outlook is negative on all ratings, in line with the sovereign, and with other Italian banks.

Banca Carige

Banca Carige's long and short-term deposit ratings were downgraded to Baa3/Prime-3 from Baa2/Prime-2. The other ratings and the negative outlook are unaffected.

The key driver for the one-notch downgrade of the deposit ratings is the downgrade of Italy. At this Baa2 rating level of the government, our assessment of a moderate probability of systemic support in the event of a financial crisis results in no uplift from the baa3 standalone credit assessment (from one notch of uplift previously), under our joint default analysis (JDA) methodology.

Credito Emiliano

Credito Emiliano's long and short-term deposit ratings were downgraded to Baa3/Prime-3 from Baa2/Prime-2. The other ratings and the negative outlook are unaffected.

The one-notch downgrade of the deposit ratings follows the downgrade of Italy. At this rating level of the Italian government, our assessment of a moderate probability of systemic support in the event of a financial crisis provides no uplift from the baa3 standalone credit assessment (from one notch of uplift previously), under our joint default analysis (JDA) methodology.

GE Capital SpA

GE Capital Spa's long-term deposit rating was downgraded to Baa2 from Baa1. The outlook remains negative.

According to Moody's, the downgrade reflects the downgrade of Italy. GE Capital's business is domestic and as such, its rating is constrained by the sovereign rating, despite parental support. In Moody's view, parental support from General Electric Capital Corporation (rated A1/P-1) continues to be very high, but is likely to be linked to the longer-term prospects for the business in Italy. As a result, we have lowered the parental support uplift provided to the bank's deposit rating to three from four notches. This uplift is based on our expectation of (i) a very high probability of parental support from General Electric Capital Corporation ; and (ii) low probability of systemic support for GE Capital Spa in the event of a financial crisis.

Cassa Depositi e Prestiti

The government-related issuer (GRI) Cassa Depositi e Prestiti's long-term issuer and debt ratings have been downgraded to Baa2, with a negative outlook. This is at the same level as the Italian government, given its 70% government ownership and the strong financial and operational linkages with the government, reflected in its public policy function. The outlook is negative in line with the negative outlook on the sovereign.

Istituto Servizi Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA)

The GRI ISMEA's long-term issuer rating has been downgraded to Baa2, with a negative outlook. This is at the same level as the Italian government, given its full government ownership and the strong financial and operational linkages with the government, reflected in its public policy function. The outlook is negative in line with the negative outlook on the sovereign.

The methodologies used in these ratings were Moody's Consolidated Global Bank Rating Methodology published in June 2012, Finance Company Global Rating Methodology published in March 2012, and Government-Related Issuers: Methodology Update published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entities or their designated agents and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare each of the ratings are the following: parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entities, obligations or credits satisfactory for the purposes of issuing these ratings.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning the ratings is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entities or their related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

The below contact information is provided for information purposes only. Please see the issuer page on www.moodys.com for Moody's regulatory disclosure of the name of the lead analyst and the office that has issued the credit rating.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Johannes Wassenberg
MD - Banking
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Gregory?Winans?Bauer
MD - Global Banking
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Releasing Office:
Moody's Italia S.r.l
Corso di Porta Romana 68
Milan 20122
Italy
Telephone:+39-02-9148-1100

Moody's downgrades Italian banks
No Related Data.

 

© 2014 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

 


CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATION") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

 


MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

 


ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

 


All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications.

 


To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

 


To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

 


NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

 


MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

 


For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

© 2014 Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.
Regional Sites: