Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
15 Oct 2013
Downgrade affects $1.1 billion of outstanding debt
New York, October 15, 2013 -- Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the ratings of the SH 130 Concession
Company, LLC ("the Project") to Caa3 from B1,
including the Senior Bank Facility with $686 million outstanding
and the subordinate Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
Act (TIFIA) loan with $493 million outstanding. The rating
outlook is negative.
SH130 Concession Company LLC is a limited liability company owned by Cintra
TX 56, LLC (65% ownership) and Zachry Toll Road 56,
LP (35% ownership). The Project has a concession granted
by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for the southern-most
tolled sections of SH 130, comprising 41 miles of a 90 mile bypass
around the city of Austin, TX.
The downgrade to Caa3 from B1 reflects the increased prospects for a payment
default owing to rapid deterioration in the Project's liquidity
in 2013 due to substantially weaker than forecasted traffic and revenue
performance since the April 2013 downgrade to B1. The continued
subpar performance has resulted in the near full use of the $35
million liquidity facility to fund the June 2013 debt service payment.
Moody's revised forecasts now indicate that nearly all of the $30
million of available contingent equity will be used to fund the December
2013 debt service payment and a part of the June 2014 debt service payment.
Absent a marked increase in traffic and revenue over the next eight months
or significant remediation support from the sponsors, Moody's
expects that the Project will have insufficient cash to meet is debt service
payments due in June 2014. A payment default would have uncertain
near-term ramifications for the Project given the multiple bank
swap counterparties could terminate their swap agreements and demand a
termination payment (swaps are currently about $107 million out
of the money). An ongoing payment default could lead to events
that eventually allow TXDOT to terminate the concession agreement,
which could limit the lenders' ability to take possession of the
collateral. A concession termination would significantly increase
the potential loss given default; however, the lenders could
exercise their rights to remediate the default to prevent a concession
termination. The rating on the TIFIA loan is parity with the senior
bank loan, given the springing lien on the TIFIA facility,
which makes TIFIA pari passu with senior debt if there is a bankruptcy
related event of the company. The Caa3 rating further incorporates
our current expectation of a moderate level of impairment, given
a serious near-term shortfall in cash available for debt service,
balanced against the 20-year concession tail after the current
senior debt amortizes and the flexible repayment terms of the subordinate
The negative outlook reflects Moody's view that traffic and revenue will
continue to grow at a slow to moderate, yet inadequate pace in order
to meet the current debt service profile. The outlook also reflects
the uncertainty regarding additional sponsor support and the ultimate
lender recovery rate in a post payment default environment.
What Could Change the Rating - Up
A rating upgrade is unlikely at this time. The rating could recover
if over a long and sustained period, the toll road is providing
sufficient cash flow to pay debt service on a current and forward-looking
What Could Change the Rating - Down
The rating on the Project would be further pressured if Moody's
determines the loss given default will be higher than currently expected.
In April 2013 we downgraded the ratings to B1 to reflect the weak traffic
and revenue performance during the initial ramp up phase of the new toll
road that began operating in November 2012. Since then, the
additional 6 months of traffic and revenue show monthly growth,
but not at rates necessary to generate sufficient revenue to meet operating
and debt obligations through the June 30, 2014 debt service payment.
Moody's forecasts in April 2013 have not been realized and new forecasts
based on 10 months of real data indicate a slow growth profile rather
than a steep ramp up as would have been expected for new toll roads in
their first years of operations.
TXDOT has shown support for the toll road by subsidizing a one-year
heavy truck toll discount and funding new signage in key areas north and
south of the route to build awareness of the new 35 alternative and its
current discount for large trucks. The company has also embarked
on an aggressive marketing campaign that extends to NAFTA truckers in
Laredo. These combined efforts have resulted in traffic and revenue
growth, but the growth rates remain well below those required to
generate sufficient revenues to meet all near term obligations.
The Project was structured from the beginning to use reserves during the
ramp up phase, but these are expected to be depleted by June 2014.
The Project has fully drawn its $35 million liquidity facility
and will use the majority of the $30 million of available sponsor
contingent equity to fund the December 2013 debt service payment,
comprised of senior lien interest and swap payments only as the subordinate
TIFIA loan's interest payments begin in 2017. Even under
optimistic scenarios, Moody's forecasts a shortfall in available
funds to pay the June 30, 2014 debt service payments. All
available liquidity facilities, contingent equity, and excess
revenues on hand will be fully utilized when the June 30, 2014 payment
is due. Thus, absent a sponsor injection of equity,
a debt restructuring, or some other method of generating significantly
more revenues, there is a high likelihood of a payment default in
It remains uncertain if the sponsors will provide additional equity support
for the Project. A new traffic and revenue study will be completed
by February 2014, as required by TIFIA. The fully drawn $35
million liquidity facility reportedly has a 30 year repayment term.
The counterparties are unable to terminate the swaps unless a payment
default occurs. Thus, given the higher likelihood of a payment
default, any of the multiple swap counterparties could decide to
terminate the swaps and ask for a termination payment, which the
Project cannot afford at this time. This ability to terminate also
heightens the Project's default risk.
Moody's notes that the Project has a favorable location and provides
congestion relief to the highly utilized I-35 NAFTA corridor.
However, the rate of traffic and revenue growth is not enough to
meet the debt obligations that continue to grow when TIFIA interest payments
begin in 2017. As a result, a debt restructuring of some
kind or sponsor equity support are the only feasible options, besides
allowing a payment default to occur. The senior lenders and TIFIA
could also wait until revenues are sufficient to meet required debt service
payments. Given the 20 year tail on the concession agreement after
senior debt is paid, Moody's believes any loss given default
will be low to moderate over the long-term. Even assuming
generous annual revenue growth rates, our discounted cash flow analysis
indicates the Project may be unable to fully support the current debt
quantum in the long-term, resulting in a higher than previously
forecasted loss given default that is commensurate with the current rating
The road opened to traffic in October 2012, which was one month
ahead of the start of operations per the facility agreement, but
approximately four months behind the originally anticipated date.
The road began charging tolls in November. The history of traffic
and revenue is limited to that of the 10 months since it has been in operation,
from November 2012 to August 2013.
The Project's financing was structured, from the beginning,
to contemplate the use of a $35 million liquidity facility that
was put in place in order to support debt service payments in the first
18 to 24 months of operations. The structure also includes a sponsor
commitment for contingent equity in an amount of $30 million.
Given the relatively modest delay in the start of operations and primarily
due to the lower than anticipated revenue generation, the liquidity
facility was used to augment operating cash flows for the debt service
payments in December 2012 and June 2013 and the contingent equity will
be used for the December 2013 and part of the June 2014 debt service payments.
A debt service reserve fund is also part of the security package,
but it is not required to be funded until 2016. The fact that the
debt service reserve is not yet funded is a further weakness. Even
if traffic and revenue grow sufficiently strongly to deliver 1.00
times coverage by 2017 when TIFIA interest payments start (increasing
total debt service to approximately $78 million per annum),
the absence of a cash reserve means the company will likely have no safety
margin and will be at an elevated risk of default and low near term recovery
over the next few years.
Moody's notes ongoing initiatives both by the company and TxDOT to stimulate
usage of the road, and still awaits an updated long term financial
plan from the company outlining the plan to meet debt service obligations.
The current debt service profile is too burdensome for the Project in
its current ramp-up phase and provides little breathing room,
especially given traffic has not materialized as expected.
The ratings on SH 130 Concession Company LLC incorporate the relatively
strong fundamentals of the Project, including the strong,
diverse, and growing economy in the Austin to San Antonio corridor,
and the generally supportive concession terms.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Operational Toll Roads
published in December 2006. Please see the Credit Policy page on
www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and
whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit
rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Project Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
Chee Mee Hu
MD - Project Finance
Project Finance Group
Moody's downgrades SH 130 Concession Company to Caa3 from B1; Outlook negative
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.