New York, March 30, 2020 -- Moody's Investors Service, ("Moody's") downgraded
United States Steel Corporation's (U. S. Steel) Corporate
Family Rating (CFR) to Caa1 from B2, its Probability of Default
rating to Caa1-PD from B2-PD and its senior unsecured ratings,
including all Industrial Revenue Bond Ratings to Caa2 from B3.
The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating was downgraded to SGL-3
from SGL-2. The outlook has been revised to negative from
stable.
"The rating downgrade reflects U. S. Steel's
weaker debt protection measures than expected and increase in leverage
to 6.7x in 2019 from 2.2x the prior year due to difficult
market conditions and a weak price environment as well as the increase
in debt to fund strategic investments, including the acquisition
of a 49.9% interest in Big River Steel. Performance
and metrics will further weaken in 2020 as a result of further softening
in demand amidst expectations for lower GDP as the coronavirus spreads
globally" said Carol Cowan Moody's Senior Vice President and
lead analyst for U. S. Steel.
Downgrades:
..Issuer: Allegheny County Industrial Dev.
Auth., PA
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: Bucks County Industrial Development Auth.,
PA
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4)from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: Hoover (City of) AL, Industrial Devel.
Board
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: Indiana Finance Authority
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: Ohio Water Development Authority
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: Southwestern Illinois Development Authority
....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
..Issuer: United States Steel Corporation
.... Probability of Default Rating,
Downgraded to Caa1-PD from B2-PD
.... Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating,
Downgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-2
.... Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded
to Caa1 from B2
....Senior Unsecured Conv./Exch.
Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture,
Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from B3 (LGD4)
Outlook Actions:
..Issuer: United States Steel Corporation
....Outlook, Changed To Negative From
Stable
RATINGS RATIONALE
This rating action is based upon the impact of the coronavirus,
which is viewed as a social risk under our ESG framework, given
the substantial implications for public health and safety. The
impact of the coronavirus on the end markets to which U. S.
Steel sells will meaningfully impact the company's earnings and
cash flow generation in 2020 following the weaker performance in 2019.
The Caa1 CFR reflects the deterioration in performance and metrics that
occurred in 2019, as prices declined on a quarterly basis with 4th
quarter realized prices for North America flat-rolled down 12%
from the 1st quarter, USSE down approximately 7% and tubular
down around 16% all on a comparable quarter to quarter basis.
Difficult market conditions in Europe, where the PMI remained below
50 for most of 2019, auto production declined, and the steel
markets were challenged by imports resulted in USSE's segment EBITDA
declined to $35 million. In the US, declining rig
counts, softening in light vehicle production and general flat to
down industrial demand contributed to the North American Flat-Rolled
segment's EDITDA dropping 48% to $652 million while
the Tubular segment EBITDA's loss widened to $21 million
against weak market conditions, and industry high inventory levels
from increased imports of OCTG despite lower imports overall. The
first quarter of 2020 will remain weak while the second quarter will be
further challenged given deteriorating economic conditions and temporary
plant closures by US and European auto producers, important end
markets for U. S. Steel. The duration of closures
could extend longer than anticipated. With slowing economic activity,
back up in the supply chains is also expected.
Given expectations for EBITDA generation in 2020 to decline between 25%
and 44% relative to 2019 ($740 million with Moody's
standard adjustments) leverage is likely to exceed 10x.
Given the further deterioration in market conditions unfolding in 2020,
the company will immediately idle the Gary #4 blast furnace and begin
to undertake the planned outage at a reduced scope and delay components
of the originally planned outage. This blast furnace will remain
idle until market conditions improve. In addition, Blast
Furnace A at Granite City works will be temporarily idled. The
Lorrain Tubular Operations in Ohio and Lone Star Tubular Operations in
Texas.will be indefinitely idled commencing in late May.
Additionally, in order to minimize cash flow burn and maintain liquidity,
capital spending in 2020 will be reduced to $750 million.
Construction at the Mon Valley Works will be delayed, as will upgrades
to the Gary Hot Strip Mill, while the Dynamo line development at
USSE remains delayed. The company expects to complete the EAF at
Fairfield with the first arc expected in the second half of 2020.
The capital for this project was prefunded with the issuance of environmental
revenue bonds in late 2019. This reduction in capital expenditures
will minimize the level of negative cash flow generation, which
based upon our assumed EBITDA decline, would be less than $500
million.
The rapid and widening spread of the coronavirus outbreak, deteriorating
global economic outlook, falling oil prices, and asset price
declines are creating a severe and extensive credit shock across many
sectors, regions and markets. The combined credit effects
of these developments are unprecedented. The steel sector is a
sector that will be affected by the shock given its sensitivity to end
market demand, such as automotive, OCTG, general manufacturing
and sentiment. More specifically, the weaknesses in U.
S. Steel's credit profile following a challenging 2019 have
left it more vulnerable to shifts in market sentiment in these unprecedented
operating conditions. We regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social
risk under our ESG framework, given the substantial implications
for public health and safety.
The SGL-3 speculative grade liquidity rating reflects the company's
adequate liquidity with cash reducing to $749 million and $600
million drawn at year-end 2019 under its $2.0 billion
asset based revolving credit facility (ABL), which contains a $150
million first in-last out tranche. U. S. Steel
also had $190 million in restricted cash, largely reflecting
the issuance of IRB's in 2019 for funding of the EAF at Fairfield.
Liquidity has been bolstered by the drawdown of a further $800
million under U. S. Steel's ABL to enhance its cash
position. The extent to which the value of inventory and receivables
in the borrowing base contract remains a risk to remaining availability.
The facility requires the company to maintain a fixed charge coverage
ratio for the most recent four consecutive quarters should availability
be less than the greater of 10% of the total aggregate commitment
and $200 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio allows
for certain exclusions such as certain capital expenditures. The
facility matures in October 2024 but can be accelerated 91 days prior
to the maturity of any senior debt outstanding if certain liquidity conditions
are not met. With the company's debt repayments in recent
years, there are no senior note maturities until 2025, subsequent
to the maturity date of the ABL.
There is also a Euro 460 million ($517 million equivalent at year-end
December 31,2019) secured credit facility (receivables and inventory)
at the company's U. S. Steel Kosice (USSK) subsidiary
in Europe, which matures in December 2024. Euro 350 million
(roughly $393 million was outstanding at December 31, 2019).
The facility contains a net debt/EBITDA covenant for which the first measurement
date is June 30, 2021 and a further covenant requiring that total
equity be no less than 40% of total assets
The negative outlook assumes that demand fundamentals for the steel industry
in the US and Europe remain vulnerable to further deterioration in demand
of uncertain duration and downward price trends. The outlook expects
increased leverage and weaker debt protection metrics absent levers the
company has to minimize negative cash flow and maintain adequate liquidity.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:
Given the uncertainty as to the duration of weakening global conditions
as well as the significant investment requirements over the next several
years and need to execute on these strategic projects, a ratings
upgrade is unlikely. However, should market conditions improve
such that higher prices are sustainable, and the company can sustain
leverage of no more than 4.5x through varying price points on the
downside and (CFO-dividends) in excess of 10%, positive
ratings momentum could develop. Should liquidity deteriorate or
access to the ABL be reduced due to an imbalance between the size of the
facility and the borrowing base, the ratings could be downgraded.
U. S. Steel, like all producers in the global steel
sector faces pressure to reduce greenhouse gas and air pollution emissions,
among a number of other sustainability issues and will likely incur costs
to meet increasingly stringent regulations. As such, the
company faces longer term secular challenges in the ongoing shift away
from blast furnace steelmaking to EAFs.
U. S. Steel and companies who produce steel using the blast
furnace process ( integrated producers -use primarily coal and
iron ore to produce steel) have higher greenhouse gas emissions and face
greater challenges than producers who use the electric arc furnace (EAF),
which have a greater percentage of scrap (recycled steel) in the raw material
mix. Additionally, with the move to increasingly higher CAFÉ
standards, producers supplying the automotive industry face increasing
competition from other materials such as aluminum. U. S.
Steel continues to focus on its Advanced High- Strength Steel product
development to help mitigate against this market erosion. The increasing
use of debt in the capital structure, while for key strategic initiatives
indicates a higher tolerance for leverage in the capital structure.
Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U. S.
Steel is the second largest flat-rolled producer in the US in terms
of production capacity. The company manufactures and sells a wide
variety of steel sheet, tubular and tin products across a broad
array of industries, including service centers, transportation,
appliance, construction, containers, and oil,
gas and petrochemicals. Revenues for the twelve months ended December
31, 2019 were $12.9 billion.
The principal methodology used in these ratings was Steel Industry published
in September 2017 and available at https://www.moodys.com/research/Steel-Industry--PBC_1074524.
Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com
for a copy of this methodology.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and
sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and
Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody's
Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.
For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of
debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures
in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the
same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant
to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing
ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings
issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain
regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the
support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action
for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's
credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement
provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional
rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may
be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each
case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior
to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have
affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings
tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action,
and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action,
the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated
agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody's Policy
for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on
its website www.moodys.com.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit
rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating
review.
Moody's general principles for assessing environmental, social
and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1133569.
At At least one ESG consideration was material to the credit rating outcome
announced and described above.
The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was
issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed
by Moody's Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt
am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph
3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies.
Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's
office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Carol Cowan
Senior Vice President
Corporate Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Glenn B. Eckert
Associate Managing Director
Corporate Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376
Client Service: 1 212 553 1653