Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
03 Sep 2010
New York, September 03, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service announced today that it has downgraded the rating
of one class of notes issued by Opus CDO I Limited. The notes affected
by today's rating action are as follows:
U.S.$435,500,000 Super Senior Swap (current
notional of $276,578,706), Downgraded to Ca (sf);
previously on March 24, 2009 Downgraded to Caa3 (sf).
According to Moody's, the rating downgrade action today is the result
of deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying reference portfolio.
Such credit deterioration is observed through numerous factors,
including a decline in the average credit rating of the portfolio (as
measured by an increase in the weighted average rating factor),
and an increase in the dollar amount of defaulted securities. The
weighted average rating factor, as reported by the trustee,
has increased from 4991 in March 2009 to 6378 in August 2010. Defaulted
securities, as reported by the trustee, has also increased
from $16 million to $42 million in that period. Additionally,
approximately $25 million of RMBS within the underlying portfolio
are currently on review for possible downgrade as a result of Moody's
updated loss projections.
Moody's notes that in arriving at its ratings of ABS CDOs,
there exist a number of sources of uncertainty, operating both on
a macro level and on a transaction-specific level. Among
the general macro uncertainties are those surrounding future housing prices,
pace of residential mortgage foreclosures, loan modification and
refinancing, unemployment rate and interest rates. Also,
in arriving at the rating action described above, Moody's performed
sensitivity analyses whereby one or more key variables were changed.
For example, if defaulted assets in the reference portolio continue
to increase then the current rating could deteriorate by one notch.
Moody's explained that in arriving at the rating action noted above,
the ratings of subprime, Alt-A and Option-ARM RMBS
which are currently on review for possible downgrade were stressed.
For purposes of monitoring its ratings of SF CDOs with exposure to such
2005-2007 vintage RMBS, Moody's used certain projections
of the lifetime average cumulative losses as set forth in Moody's press
releases dated January 13th for subprime, January 14th for Alt-A,
and January 27th for Option-ARM. Based on the anticipated
ratings impact of the updated cumulative loss numbers, the stress
varied based on vintage, current rating, and RMBS asset type.
For 2005 Alt-A and Option-ARM securities, securities
that are currently rated Aaa (sf) or Aa (sf) were stressed by eleven notches,
and securities currently rated A (sf) or Baa (sf) were stressed by eight
notches. Those securities currently rated in the Ba (sf) or B (sf)
range were stressed to Caa3 (sf), while current Caa (sf) securities
were treated as Ca (sf). For 2006 and 2007 Alt-A and Option-ARM
securities, currently Aaa (sf) or Aa (sf) rated securities were
stressed by eight notches, and securities currently rated A (sf)
, Baa (sf) or Ba (sf) were stressed by five notches. Those
securities currently rated in the B range were stressed to Caa3 (sf),
while current Caa (sf) securities were treated as Ca (sf).
For 2005 subprime RMBS, those currently rated Aa (sf), A (sf)
or Baa (sf) were stressed by five notches, Ba (sf) rated securities
were stressed to Caa3 (sf), and B (sf) or Caa (sf) securities were
treated as Ca (sf). For subprime RMBS originated in the first half
of 2006, those currently rated Aaa (sf) were stressed by four notches,
while Aa (sf), A (sf) and Baa (sf) rated securities were stressed
by eight notches. Those securities currently rated in the Ba (sf)
range were stressed to Caa3 (sf), while current B (sf) and Caa (sf)
securities were treated as Ca (sf). For subprime RMBS originated
in the second half of 2006, those currently rated Aa (sf),
A (sf) , Baa (sf) or Ba (sf) were stressed by four notches,
currently B (sf) rated securities were treated as Caa3 (sf), and
currently Caa (sf) rated securities were treated as Ca (sf). For
2007 subprime RMBS, currently Ba (sf) rated securities were stressed
by four notches, currently B (sf) rated securities were treated
as Caa3 (sf), and currently Caa (sf) rated securities were treated
as Ca (sf).
Moody's noted that the stresses applicable to categories of 2005-2007
subprime RMBS that are not listed above will be two notches if the RMBS
ratings are on review for possible downgrade.
For purposes of monitoring its ratings of SF CDOs with exposure to pre-2005
vintage RMBS, Moody's considered the various factors indicating
continued negative performance that were described in Moody's press releases
dated April 8th for subprime, April 12th for Option-ARM and
April 13th for Alt-A. Such seasoned deals will have varying
stress based on RMBS asset type.
For pre-2005 Alt-A, Aaa (sf) rated securities were
stressed by four notches, Aa (sf) rated securities by six notches,
and A (sf ) or Baa (sf) rated securities by nine notches. Pre-2005
Option-ARM securities currently rated Aaa (sf) were stressed by
two notches, Aa (sf) and A (sf) by six notches, and Baa (sf)
by nine notches.
For pre-2005 subprime, Aaa (sf) and Aa (sf) rated securities
were stressed by two notches, A (sf) rated securities were stressed
by six notches, and Baa (sf) rated securities were stressed by nine
All subprime, Alt-A and Option-ARM RMBS securities
which originated prior to 2005, are currently rated Ba (sf) or below,
and are also currently on review for possible downgrade have been stressed
to Ca (sf).
Moody's further explained that these stresses are based on a preliminary
sample analysis of deals from a given vintage and asset type, and
that they will be utilized in its SF CDO rating analysis while subprime,
Alt-A and Option-ARM securities remain on review for downgrade.
Current public ratings will be used for securities that have undergone
an in depth review by our RMBS team, and that are no longer on review
In addition to the quantitative factors that are explicitly modeled,
qualitative factors are part of rating committee considerations.
These qualitative factors include the structural protections in each transaction,
the recent deal performance in the current market environment, the
legal environment, specific documentation features, the collateral
manager's track record, and the potential for selection bias in
the portfolio. All information available to rating committees,
including macroeconomic forecasts, input from other Moody's analytical
groups, market factors, and judgments regarding the nature
and severity of credit stress on the transactions, may influence
the final rating decision.
In deriving its ratings, Moody's uses the collateral instrument's
current rating-based expected loss, Moody's recovery rate
table, and the original rating of the instrument along with its
average life to infer an unadjusted default probability.
The approach Moody's takes to defining the default distribution
for the SF CDO collateral depends on the structure of the CDO itself.
Moody's applied the Monte Carlo simulation framework within CDOROMv2.6
to model the loss distribution for SF CDOs. Within this framework,
defaults are generated so that they occur with the frequency indicated
by the adjusted default probability pool (the default probability associated
with the current rating multiplied by the Resecuritization Stress) for
each credit in the reference. Specifically, correlated defaults
are simulated using a normal (or "Gaussian") copula model
that applies the asset correlation framework. Recovery rates for
defaulted credits are generated by applying within the simulation the
distributional assumptions, including the correlation between recovery
values. Together, the simulated defaults and recoveries across
each of the Monte Carlo scenarios define the loss distribution for the
The capital structure is incorporated into CDOROM by specifying the attachment
point and the thickness of the tranche. The Expected Loss (EL)
for each tranche is the weighted average of losses to each tranche across
all the scenarios, where the weight is the likelihood of the scenario
occurring. Moody's defines the loss as the shortfall in the
present value of cash flows to the tranche relative to the present value
of the promised cash flows. The discount rate used to present value
is the current swap rate plus the promised spread on the tranche based
on its remaining maturity. Solely for the purpose of discounting
losses, Moody's assumes that losses on the tranche occur 60%
of the way through the maturity of the tranche. The final EL of
the synthetic SF CDO tranche is the discounted average of the tranche
loss across all the scenarios simulated in CDOROM. Since the EL
is based on a simulation process, the convergence of the simulation
will depend, in part, on the number of iterations chosen for
the simulation. Moody's applies a 99% confidence interval
to the EL result using a Standard Error equal to the square root of the
EL Variance divided by the number of Monte Carlo simulations. If
this confidence interval adjustment is significant, a larger number
of iterations may be used to reduce the standard error.
The principal methodology used in rating Opus CDO I Limited was "Moody's
Approach to Rating SF CDOs" rating methodology published in August 2009.
Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process
of rating this issuer can also be found on Moody's website.
Moody's Investors Service did not receive or take into account a third
party due diligence report on the underlying assets or financial instruments
related to the monitoring of this transaction in the past 6 months.
Information sources used to determine the credit rating are the following:
1. Trustee, 2. Public information, 3.
Confidential and proprietary MIS information, 4. Confidential
and proprietary Moody's Analytics information.
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the issuer satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining a credit rating.
Further information on Moody's analysis of this transaction is available
on www.moodys.com. In addition, Moody's
publishes a weekly summary of structured finance credit, ratings
and methodologies, available to all registered users of our website,
MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Senior Vice President
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's downgrades the rating of Notes issued by Opus CDO I Limited, an ABS CDO
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
No Related Data.
© 2020 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND/OR ITS CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S (COLLECTIVELY, "PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY'S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS ("ASSESSMENTS"), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS,
ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS,
ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and Moody's investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody's Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody's Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.