Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
03 Jan 2011
$750 million (maximum) of asset-backed securities rated.
New York, January 03, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service assigned the rating of Baa1 (sf) on June 29,
2010 to the Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, Series 2010-1
(Series 2010-1 or the Notes) issued by Textainer Marine Containers
Limited (TMCL or the Issuer), an affiliate of Textainer Equipment
Management Limited (TEML or the Manager). Series 2010-1
are variable funding notes with an initial maximum of $750 million
which can be increased at the Issuer's request to up to $850 million.
TEML is a full-service global leasing company that specializes
in leasing marine cargo containers and is a subsidiary of Textainer Group
Holdings Limited, which, with its subsidiaries, is the
largest lessor of standard freight marine containers in the world.
Moody's also stated that there was no impact on its ratings of the
existing Series 2005-1 notes. The complete rating action
is as follows:
Issuer: Textainer Marine Containers Limited
$750,000,000 (maximum) Floating Rate Asset-Backed
Notes, Series 2010-1
The rating is based on the collateral consisting of a pool of marine containers,
cash flows anticipated to be generated by leases of the containers to
shipping companies, credit enhancement provided by overcollateralization
and a restricted cash account, the expertise of TEML as Manager
and the legal and structural features of the transaction.
The Issuer is a master issuing vehicle and all series share the same collateral
pool on a pari passu basis. The Issuer has previously issued its
Series 2000-1 notes and Series 2005-1 notes. Series
2005-1 is a term series which is paying down. The Series
2000-1 notes have been retired with the issuance of the Series
2010-1 notes. Like the retired series it replaces,
Series 2010-1 is revolving, providing liquidity for the purchase
of new containers. The revolving period is scheduled to last for
two years from closing. At that time if the revolving period is
not extended, the notes will 'convert' to term notes
and principal repayment begins. The legal final maturity is set
to be 15 years from the date of conversion. Prior to conversion
the Series 2010-1 notes have no scheduled principal payments but
may experience repayment in full or part based on borrowing base requirements
and cash receipts.
The required overcollateralization for all outstanding notes is established
based on an advance rate of 80.0% against a borrowing base
comprised of the book value of eligible containers plus the balance of
the restricted cash account. The restricted cash account is sized
to cover five months of interest on all of the Issuer's outstanding
TMCL is a special purpose Bermuda company formed to invest in containers
managed by TEML. A small minority interest in TMCL is held by affiliates
of Fortis Bank, N.V. while the balance is held by
a subsidiary of TGH.
The principal methodology used in rating the notes is described below.
Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process
of rating this issuer can also be found on Moody's website. Additional
research is available on http://www.moodys.com.
Moody's Investors Service did not receive or take into account a
third party due diligence report on the underlying assets or financial
instruments in this transaction.
V-SCORE AND PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES
Moody's V Score. The V Score for this transaction is Medium.
The V Score indicates "Medium" uncertainty about critical assumptions.
Moody's V Scores provide a relative assessment of the quality of available
credit information and the potential variability around the various inputs
to a rating determination. The V Score ranks transactions by the
potential for significant rating changes owing to uncertainty around the
assumptions that underlie the ratings within the categories of data quality,
historical performance and the level of disclosure for each of the asset
class sector and the issuer; transaction complexity, analytical
modeling and the market value risk; transaction governance,
backup servicing, alignment of interests and legal, regulatory
and other risks. V Scores apply to the entire transaction (rather
than individual tranches). While the overall score is Medium,
significant deviations from 'Medium' within the individual
risk categories include the following: quality of historical data
risk for the sector and the issuer are low-medium due to lengthy
available history of key data series; historical downgrade rate risk
which is low-medium as only one transaction has seen downgrades
in this sector to date; experience and oversight of transaction parties
risk, which is medium-low due to Sponsor's experience
and presence of third-party to facilitate a replacement if necessary;
and alignment of interests risk which is low due the substantial residual
in the form of overcollateralization retained by the Issuer.
Moody's Parameter Sensitivities. We analyzed the potential model-indicated
rating impact under different stress scenarios by varying the utilization
rate, which indicates the percentage of containers subject to lease
at any period in time, for containers on both short-term
and long-term lease. The base case long-term utilization
rate is assumed to be constant of 93% across all container types,
while short-term utilization rate assumptions vary by container
type with each following a triangular distribution whose parameters were
developed from the sponsor's historical experience. We stress
the base case assumed utilization rates with immediate one-time
permanent declines of 3, 6, 9, and 12 percentage points
from the base case. Under such scenarios, the initial Baa1
rating might change as follows: (i) with both long-term and
short-term utilization rate lowered by 3 percentage points from
the base case, the Baa1 initial rating would migrate to Baa3;
(ii) with both long-term and short-term utilization rate
lowered by 6 percentage points from the base case, the Baa1 initial
rating would migrate to Ba2; (iii) with a base case long-term
and short-term utilization rate lowered by 9 percentage points,
the Baa1 initial rating would migrate to Ba3; (iv) with a base case
long-term and short-term utilization rate lowered by 12
percentage points, the Baa1 initial rating would migrate to B1.
Parameter Sensitivities are not intended to measure how the rating of
the security might migrate over time; rather they are designed to
provide a quantitative calculation of how the initial rating might change
if key input parameters used in the initial rating process differed.
The analysis assumes that the deal has not aged. Parameter Sensitivities
only reflect the ratings impact of each scenario from a quantitative/model-indicated
standpoint. Qualitative factors are also taken into consideration
in the ratings process, so the actual ratings that would be assigned
in each case could vary from the information presented in the Parameter
Monte carlo simulation of asset and liability cash flows was the primary
quantitative technique used. Gross revenues generated by the container
leases were modeled through the simulation of various operating variables,
particularly utilization rates (percentage of containers under long or
short term leases) and per diem rates (lease pricing). Other simulated
variables included operating expenses, obligor defaults on long
term leases, proceeds from sold container dispositions and interest
rates. All of these variables were simulated via distributions,
which (apart from interest rates) were derived partially from historical
operational performance data and partially through qualitative assessments
of the company's expertise and the overall container leasing industry.
Several thousand iterations were run, sufficient to achieve convergence
of the decision variables. After each iteration, the spread
paid to investors over the pricing index was calculated. The average
spread paid was then calculated over all iterations and compared to the
promised spread. Due to the stressful modeling assumptions,
the average simulated spread is generally lower than the promised investor
spread. This reduction is compared to the reduction appropriate
to the requested rating. Moody's additionally considered other
rating indicators, such as expected loss and default frequency.
Key assumptions and variables simulated included the following:
(A) Utilization rate: (i) for long term lease the utilization rate
of containers is assumed to be constant of 93% throughout the life
of the transaction. (ii) for the short-term lease the utilization
of containers is assumed to follow a triangular distribution with its
parameters of minimum, mode and max vary by container types.
(B) Lease rate which is measured by per diem rate (PDR). The percentage
change in PDR is simulated annually and assumed to follow a normal distribution
with the mean and standard deviation derived from the sponsor's
historical information. (C) It is assumed that a portion of residual
value from the sales of containers will be realized. The percentage
is assumed to follows a triangular distribution with minimum, mode
and max of 80%, 90%, and 110% of depreciated
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, public information, parties
not involved in the ratings, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Investors Service information.
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the obligation satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining a credit
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Senior Vice President
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's Investors Service
Moody's rates container lease-backed notes sponsored by Textainer
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.