Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
PLEASE READ
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
1. Unless
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
2. You
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
Information.
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
I AGREE
30 Dec 2010
New York, December 30, 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service assigned the ratings of Baa2 on September
29, 2010 to the Series 2010-1 Senior Notes, Class A-1
(Series 2010-1 Senior Notes) issued by NuCO2 Funding LLC (together
with certain co-issuers, the Issuer). The Issuer is
a subsidiary of NuCO2 Florida Inc. (Sponsor and Master Manager),
which in turn is a subsidiary of Nu CO2 Inc. This transaction is
the second issuance from the Issuer under a whole business securitization
structure. The Series 2010-1 Senior Notes have an expected
final maturity in June 2015 and a legal final maturity in June 2040.
In conjunction with the new issuance, Moody's also stated
that there was no impact on its Baa2 rating of the existing Series 2008-1
Class A-1, A-2 and A-3 Senior Notes (Series
2008-1 Senior Notes, and together with the Series 2010-1
Senior Notes, the Senior Notes). The Sponsor's primary
business, conducted through the Issuer, is providing beverage
grade carbon dioxide (CO2) and equipment for storage and dispensing thereof,
to vendors of carbonated fountain beverages including quick service restaurants,
convenience stores, theaters and event venues nationally.
The complete rating action is as follows:
Issuer: NuCO2 Funding LLC, Series 2010-1
Senior Notes, Cl. A-1, Assigned Baa2 (sf)
RATING RATIONALE
The Senior Notes are collateralized by essentially all of the tangible
and intangible assets comprising the business of the Issuer on a pari
passu basis. The ratings on the Senior Notes are based primarily
on the following factors: (i) stable cash flows anticipated to be
generated by the securitized assets, consisting primarily of a revolving
highly diversified pool of equipment lease and carbon dioxide supply contracts
and agreements entered into with chain and independent quick service restaurants,
convenience stores and other establishments serving carbonated fountain
beverages to consumers; and the associated equipment installed on
premises; (ii) expected stable long-term demand for carbonated
fountain beverages; (iii) market share, business model and
competitive position of the Issuer as managed by the Sponsor, which
represents the only national provider of Bulk CO2 to the fountain beverage
industry; (iv) payment structure including early amortization events
which provide for early termination of the five-year interest only
period, and turbo structure which applies all available cash flow
after payment of operating expenses and interest on the Senior Notes to
the payment of principal pro rata among the Senior Notes; (v) liquid
credit enhancement in the form of cash in a reserve account sufficient
to cover six months of interest on the aggregate outstanding Senior Notes,
subject to adjustment thereafter, funded at closing from proceeds
and from time to time thereafter from excess cash flow and/or equity contributions
from the Sponsor; (vi) experience and expertise of the Sponsor as
master manager; (vii) presence of administrative agent and backup
manager from date of closing to provide ongoing transaction oversight
and to mitigate operational risks relating to the managerial responsibilities
of the Sponsor; and (viii) legal structure intended to isolate the
operating risk associated with performing services under the contracts
and agreements from the bankruptcy risk of the Sponsor.
The principal methodology used in rating the notes is described below.
Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process
of rating this issuer can also be found on Moody's website. Additional
research is available on http://www.moodys.com.
Moody's Investors Service did not receive or take into account a
third party due diligence report on the underlying assets or financial
instruments in this transaction.
V-SCORE AND PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES
Moody's V Score. The V Score for this transaction is Medium-High.
The V Score indicates "Medium-High" uncertainty about critical
assumptions. Moody's V Scores provide a relative assessment of
the quality of available credit information and the potential variability
around the various inputs to a rating determination. The V Score
ranks transactions by the potential for significant rating changes owing
to uncertainty around the assumptions that underlie the ratings within
the categories of data quality, historical performance and the level
of disclosure for each of the asset class sector and the issuer;
transaction complexity, analytical modeling and the market value
risk; transaction governance, backup servicing, alignment
of interests and legal, regulatory and other risks. V Scores
apply to the entire transaction (rather than individual tranches).
While the overall score is Medium-High, significant deviations
from 'Medium' within the individual categories include the
following: transaction complexity risk, which is judged to
be medium-high; legal, regulatory and other risks,
which is medium-high due to the limited history of whole business
securitization structures and lack of legal test; alignment of interests
risk which is low, due to the totality of the collateral package
and the substantial amount of business value in excess of the debt;
issuer historic performance variability, which is medium-low
based on historical performance; ongoing securitization performance
disclosure, which is medium-low based on completeness of
ongoing reporting; and market value sensitivity, which is medium-low
due to low exposure to asset liquidation events giving rise to market
value risk, since the rated notes are repaid via cash flow in almost
any scenario.
Moody's Parameter Sensitivities. We analyzed the potential model-indicated
rating impact under different stress scenarios for two key variables:
(a) likelihood of an economic transformative event, and (b) impact
of servicer default. For (a), an economic transformative
event is an event beyond the control of the manager, the occurrence
of which is posited as a possibility without specifying any particular
mechanism or cause, which would create a three-year sustained
spike in attrition of 10% per year, and permanently increase
costs and reduce operating margins by 15% of revenues. The
likelihood of the event is specified by reference to Moody's rating
tables, and in the base case is Ba1 and thus we stress this variable
by lowering the assumed rating, which results in higher frequency,
to B1 and B3. For (b), the precise impact of a servicer default
is not known but in the base case the reduction in renewal rate is assumed
to be uniformly distributed with parameters (10%, 20%)
while the attrition rate is assumed to follow a triangular distribution
with minimum, mode and maximum of 0%, 2% and
5% (whereas before default the contract attrition fluctuates positively
and negatively around zero). We stress the impact of a servicer
default by assuming greater declines in renewal rates and greater increases
in attrition. Therefore the parameter sensitivity stress results
show that the initial Baa2 might change as follows: (i) with an
economic transformative event likelihood assumption of Ba1, the
Baa2 initial rating is Baa2 in base case when the parameters for renewal
haircut and attrition rate are (10%, 20%) and (0,
2%, 5%) respectively, and would remain Baa2
in a stress case when the renewal rates and attribution rate both increased
by 10 percentage point from the base case, but would migrate to
Ba1 in a stress case when renewal rates and attrition rate are both increased
by 15 percentage point from the base case; (ii) with an economic
transformative event likelihood assumption of B1, the Baa2 initial
rating would remain Baa2 in base case when the parameters for renewal
haircut and attrition rate are (10%, 20%) and (0,
2%, 5%) respectively, and would move to Baa3
and Ba2, respectively, in stress cases when the renewal rates
and attribution rate are both increased by 10 and 15 percentage points
respectively from the base case; (iii) with an economic transformative
event likelihood assumption of B3, the Baa2 initial rating would
remain Baa2 in base case when the parameters for renewal haircut and attrition
rate are (10%, 20%) and (0, 2%,
5%) respectively, and would move to Ba1 and B1 in stress
cases when the renewal rates and attribution rate are both increased by
10 and 15 percentage points respectively from the base case.
Parameter Sensitivities are not intended to measure how the rating of
the security might migrate over time; rather they are designed to
provide a quantitative calculation of how the initial rating might change
if key input parameters used in the initial rating process differed.
The analysis assumes that the deal has not aged. Parameter Sensitivities
only reflect the ratings impact of each scenario from a quantitative/model-indicated
standpoint. Qualitative factors are also taken into consideration
in the ratings process, so the actual ratings that would be assigned
in each case could vary from the information presented in the Parameter
Sensitivity analysis.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
Moody's analyzes cash flows of the proposed transaction and evaluates
their sufficiency to make timely interest payments on the notes and repay
the principal by the legal maturity date using a simulation-based
approach. We identify key drivers of the cash flows and estimate
their expected value over the course of the transaction as well as the
probability distribution around that value. We derive expected
revenues and expenses and distributions based on the analysis of historical
performance trends of the collateral business. In this case,
Moody's analyzed the transaction utilizing a cash flow model which generates
cash flows for the business which are then fed into the securitized issuance
structure. The expense base was allocated into fixed and variable
components as previously described. Variables were then inserted
into the model to simulate the
potential dynamics of the business. The yield on the resulting
simulated cash flows of the Senior Obligations was calculated for each
of thousands of simulation iterations, and the average yield reduction
relative to the promised coupon for the rated notes was determined.
The average yield reduction is then compared to Moody's benchmark reduction
for the requested rating.
Key assumptions and variables simulated included the following:
(A) Contract growth rates: (i) annual renewal rates for maturing
contracts assumed to be a triangular distribution ranging from 5%
to 15% non-renewal (ii) annual net attrition rates (attrition
for existing non-maturing contracts plus growth for new contracts)
ranging from -2% (shrinkage) to +3% (growth)
with a no credit for or a severe haircut to contractual early termination
payments; (B) Product usage: growth of 1% per annum;
(C) Product pricing: zero growth in CPI/PPI (inflation tends to
benefit cash flows due to contract provisions); (D) Transaction life:
despite the 30-year legal final, no credit was given to cash
flows after year 18; however a stressed liquidation value was assigned
to the related Bulk CO2 tanks in year 18 in light of their tangible asset
value.
Two additional default variables were overlaid to these variables:
(A) Sponsor risk: the Sponsor was assumed to default at any time
during the first ten years of the transaction, with a probability
consistent with a low non-investment grade rating. Upon
the occurrence of default and thereafter, the distribution of annual
net attrition rates is reduced by a range of -5% to zero
(i.e., no net growth, only shrinkage or flatline)
for the remainder of the transaction life. (B) Industry risk:
positing that other events might possibly occur unrelated to a Sponsor
default, an industry risk event was added which was assumed to occur
with a probability consistent with a high non- investment rating.
Upon the occurrence of this event, net attrition is assumed to spike
to 10% each year for three straight years. In addition,
the securitized cash flow margin on revenues is assumed to permanently
decrease by 15% (percentage points of revenue).
The results in terms of reduction in average yield were consistent with
the rating. Several of the key stresses and assumptions were tested.
Moody's additionally considered default frequency as well as traditional
metrics such as leverage multiples (particularly debt to securitized cash
flow) and coverage ratios (particularly the debt service coverage ratio
as reported).
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, public information, parties
not involved in the ratings, and confidential and proprietary Moody's
Investors Service information.
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the obligation satisfactory for the purposes of assigning a credit
rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
New York
Michael McDermitt
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
New York
Everett Rutan
Senior Vice President
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's Investors Service
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's rates second series from NuCO2 whole business securitization issuer
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.
|
|
