info

Yes No
Moodys.com
Terms of Use
REGULATORY AFFAIRS
CAREERS
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
HOME
Close
Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Can't read?
Try a new set
Send Cancel
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
OK
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
OK
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Terms of One-Time Website Use

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Announcement:

Moody's reviews Exelon and Exelon Generation for possible downgrade; Affirms Constellation, outlook positive

28 Apr 2011

Approximately $ 17 Billion of Debt Securities Affected.

New York, April 28, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service placed the long-term ratings of Exelon Corporation (EXC: Baa1 senior unsecured) and Exelon Generation Company, LLC (ExGen: A3 senior unsecured) under review for possible downgrade following today's announced plan to merge with Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (CEG: Baa3 senior unsecured) in a stock-for-stock transaction. Concurrent with this rating action, Moody's affirmed all of the ratings of CEG and changed CEG's rating outlook to positive from stable. EXC and ExGen's short-term ratings for commercial paper are affirmed at Prime-2, while CEG's short-term rating for commercial paper is affirmed at Prime-3.

At the same time, Moody's affirmed all of the ratings for EXC's regulated subsidiaries and their subsidiaries and maintained the stable rating outlook at Commonwealth Edison Company (CWE: Baa3 senior unsecured), PECO Energy Company (PECO: A3 senior unsecured), ComEd Financing III (Ba1 subordinated debt) and PECO Energy Capital Trust III (Baa1 subordinated debt). Moody's also affirmed all of the ratings of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE: Baa2 senior unsecured) and subsidiary, BGE Capital Trust II (Baa3 subordinated debt). The rating outlook for BGE and BGE Capital Trust II is positive.

"The rating review for EXC and ExGen reflects the pending acquisition of a lower-rated entity and the expected increase in leverage, particularly off-balance sheet debt, at a time when electric margins are compressed," said Moody's Senior Vice President A.J. Sabatelle.

The review for possible downgrade for EXC and ExGen considers our expectation for a decline in consolidated financial metrics following the merger driven in part by reduced power prices. The review also considers the substantial increase in off-balance leverage that accompanies this merger due in large part to the addition of third party guarantees and other potential calls on capital, including tolling obligations. Moody's estimates that off-balance obligations for the combined EXC could nearly triple from the current level at EXC.

While acknowledging the strategic benefits of linking a company that is long on generation resources with a company that is long on customer load, Moody's believes that the combined entity will still be exposed to earnings and cash flow volatility due to a large unregulated business platform whose financial performance is influenced by market determined commodity pricing levels. We also believe that completion of this transaction increases the likelihood that EXC will remain more focused on maintaining its leadership position among unregulated power companies. As the largest unregulated generation company in terms of production and the largest retail energy supplier in North America, we calculate that the company's unregulated operations will collectively represent at least 65% of the combined operations during periods of low power prices and likely represent at least 80% of consolidated results when more robust power generation margins exists. As such, we believe that it will be very challenging for EXC to easily transform the company's business mix into one that is materially more balanced across regulated operations given the sheer size of the existing unregulated footprint. Moreover, given the competitive position that this merger reinforces, we believe that management, along with the board, will be more inclined in the future to pursue acquisitions of additional unregulated properties as a natural extension of an existing strategy, particularly given the more streamlined and less challenging regulatory approval requirements that tend to accompany unregulated acquisitions.

Balancing these factors are the expected benefits that this merger should produce as the linkage of EXC's generation with CEG's load should considerably reduce consolidated liquidity requirements and enable the merged company to receive somewhat better margins for its electric output given the stickiness of customer load. We further recognize that completing the transaction enables EXC to gain access to end-use customers within the retail supply chain at a much faster pace and in a more efficient way than it could have otherwise achieved from building it internally. While these factors add support for the rationale behind the merger, we observe that certain of the businesses being added have little to do with matching generation with load but add to the potential capital and liquidity requirements of the firm and increase the associated volatility with operating a commodity business. As such, we view the merged company as embracing a higher risk tolerance than what may have existed in the past at EXC given the commodity platform that accompanies this transaction. For that reason, we believe the merged company's credit metrics may need to be stronger than similarly rated peers and maintain access to amply sized sources of liquidity.

"For CEG, the rating affirmation and change in rating outlook to positive from stable reflects the expected benefits with being integrated into a larger, more diverse, and more financially robust company," added Moody's Vice President Scott Solomon.

We believe the acquisition would be a credit positive event for CEG's debt holders. The company's growth prospects have been challenged by its short generation position relative to the load obligation of its retail energy supply business. We view EXC's large electric generating footprint as aligning well with CEG's multi-state retail business and would expect the combination to reduce CEG's existing sizable liquidity requirements while providing a platform for growth.

The rating affirmation and maintenance of a stable outlook at CWE and at PECO reflects the credit neutral impact that we believe this transaction will have on both utilities' financial performance. At CWE, the rating affirmation incorporates the strong credit metrics that exist for the rating category balanced against a very challenging regulatory environment for electrics in the state. To that end, future rating actions are focused in the near-term on the outcome of the company's electric rate case expected in May 2011, along with greater clarity around the prospects of statewide legislation being passed that could transform the current regulatory framework to one that would be more transparent and would reduce regulatory lag. At PECO, we believe the company is well-positioned in its rating category given the strong credit metrics and fairly predictable regulatory environment in Pennsylvania. While we anticipate strong cash flow generation at PECO over the next several years, we also expect the company to pay all of its earnings as dividends over the next couple of years which tempers the possibility for a higher rating.

The outlook for BGE remains positive due to recent improvement in its standalone credit quality. We are not considering further positive rating actions at this time, however, due to uncertainty on conditions that may be required to secure regulatory support from the Maryland Public Service Commission. While EXC and CEG have proposed certain benefits to BGE residential customers, including a $100 credit within 90 days of closing, we view the merger approval process in Maryland as a material obstacle and that garnering support for the transaction could potentially require additional concessions.

The rating review for EXC and ExGen will focus on around gaining greater insights into the components of the combined company's off-balance obligations, particularly the existing CEG guarantees that support the commodity and retail business, the strategic direction of the merged company as it relates to businesses being acquired that are not directly linked to the supply of electricity to end-use customers, the appropriate amount of reliable liquidity resources under different scenarios, and the prospects for incremental operating expenses and capital requirements mandated by various oversight groups following the nuclear accident in Japan. Additionally, the rating review will examine the details concerning the manner in which CEG's operations are folded into EXC's unregulated platform from a organizational, legal, and counterparty perspective.

The transaction requires approval by the stockholders of both EXC and CEG and various regulatory approvals, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Maryland Public Service Commission, the New York Public Service Commission and the Public Utility Commission of Texas. The companies anticipate closing in early 2012.

The principal methodology used in rating EXC, ExGen, and CEG was Rating Methodology: Unregulated Utilities and Power Companies, published August 2009, and the principal methodology used in rating CWE, PECO, and BG&E was Rating Methodology: Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities, published in August 2009. Both are available on www.moodys.com in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory under the Research and Ratings tab. Other methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process of rating these issuers can also be found in the Rating Methodologies sub-directory on Moody's website.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

On Review for Possible Downgrade:

..Issuer: Exelon Corporation

.... Issuer Rating, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently Baa1

....Multiple Seniority Shelf, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently a range of (P)Baa3 to (P)Baa1

....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently Baa1

..Issuer: Exelon Generation Company, LLC

.... Issuer Rating, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently A3

....Multiple Seniority Shelf, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently (P)Baa2, (P)A3

....Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently A3

..Issuer: Pennsylvania Economic Dev. Fin. Auth.

....Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently A3

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust I

....Preferred Stock Shelf, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently (P)Baa2

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust II

....Preferred Stock Shelf, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently (P)Baa2

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust III

....Preferred Stock Shelf, Placed on Review for Possible Downgrade, currently (P)Baa2

Outlook Actions:

..Issuer: BGE Capital Trust II

....Outlook, Changed To Positive From Negative

..Issuer: Constellation Energy Group, Inc.

....Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust I

....Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust II

....Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

..Issuer: Exelon Capital Trust III

....Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

..Issuer: Exelon Corporation

....Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

..Issuer: Exelon Generation Company, LLC

....Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

Headquartered in Chicago, IL, EXC is the holding company for unregulated subsidiary, ExGen, a large competitive power generator, which owns and operates 25,619 megawatts (MW) of capacity and controls 6,139 MW of capacity under long-term contracts. EXC also owns CWE and PECO, both regulated subsidiaries. At December 31, 2010, Exelon had total assets of approximately $52.2 billion.

Headquartered in Baltimore, MD, CEG is a diversified energy company whose operating segments include merchant energy generation (Generation), customer supply (NewEnergy) and transmission and distribution (BG&E). Generation owns and operates approximately 12,000 MW of generating capacity, including CEG's 50.01% interest in Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, and manages 6 terawatt hours of capacity through long-term tolling agreements. At December 31, 2010, CEG had total assets of approximately $20 billion.

New York
A.J. Sabatelle
Senior Vice President
Infrastructure Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

New York
Scott Solomon
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Infrastructure Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Moody's Investors Service
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653

Moody's reviews Exelon and Exelon Generation for possible downgrade; Affirms Constellation, outlook positive
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

​​​​
Moodys.com