Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
21 Jul 2008
Moody's reviews FSA's Aaa rating for possible downgrade
New York, July 21, 2008 -- Moody's Investors Service has placed the Aaa insurance financial strength
ratings of Financial Security Assurance Inc. (FSA) and its affiliated
insurance operating companies on review for possible downgrade.
In the same rating action, Moody's also placed the senior unsecured
ratings of parent company, Financial Security Assurance Holdings
Ltd. (Aa2-rated) on review for possible downgrade.
Today's rating action reflects elevated risks with the financial guaranty
insurance market and within FSA's insured portfolio. Moody's
said that FSA's credit profile may no longer be consistent with the Aaa
rating, given the materiality of the stress faced by the firm in
its insurance and asset management operations, uncertainty about
the firm's portfolio risk profile, material shifts in the
demand function for financial guarantees, and -- as observed
recently among FSA's competitors -- potential sensitivity of
its franchise and financial flexibility if losses continue to rise.
Moody's noted that, while the outcome of the review is uncertain
at this time, a downgrade of FSA's insurance financial strength
rating below Aa2 is currently seen as unlikely.
As a result of this review, the Moody's-rated securities
that are guaranteed or "wrapped" by FSA are also placed under review for
possible downgrade, except those with higher public underlying ratings.
A list of these securities will be made available under "Ratings Lists"
CAUSES OF THE REVIEW FOR DOWNGRADE
Moody's said that significant deterioration in the financial conditions
of both insurance and asset management operations of FSA, as assessed
by our updated analysis discussed below, may be inconsistent with
the expectations of a Aaa-rated insurance company given the operational
and strategic sensitivities that such stress may exemplify. As
losses have mounted in the US residential mortgage market, FSA has
avoided the source of the guarantors' greatest stress, namely
ABS CDOs. However, its exposure to direct RMBS has generated
material losses in its insurance and asset management operations.
Moody's has also previously noted operational risks, exemplified
by FSA's receiving a Wells Notice from the SEC related to its asset
management operations. Dexia, FSA's parent, has
materially mitigated the financial effect of the firm's recent losses
through its $500 million capital infusion and extension of a committed
$5 billion, five year, line of credit, however
such support may not be unconditional or sufficient to entirely mitigate
potential risks, commented the rating agency.
According to Moody's, recent events have demonstrated that
the leverage and complexity of some structured finance transactions have
made loss estimations for certain segments of FSA's insured portfolio
more difficult and the variability of those estimations, especially
given the guarantor's operating leverage, may be inconsistent
with the very low risk tolerance implied by a Aaa rating.
Moody's added that the review for downgrade also reflects the significant
reduction in overall market demand for financial guaranty enhancement.
The structured finance market that generated about half of the industry's
and FSA's new business has seen a dramatic decline as a result of
the current market dislocation. Such dramatic instability in the
firm's current and prospective market opportunity also raises questions
about whether a Aaa rating remains appropriate.
Bond insurance volumes in the municipal segment have also declined significantly,
with insurance penetration rates dropping by a third or more. Although
deterioration in the credit profile of some of the large financial guaranty
providers might have been the main factor prompting this shift,
and FSA's competitive position in this market has improved,
Moody's notes that alternatives to bond insurance and the potential
reassessment of risk by investors in this segment may negatively influence
demand in this sector in the future.
The recent market disruptions and resulting decline in equity valuations
of other financial guarantors have highlighted the extent to which the
market's perception of future adverse developments can impact not
only new business volume but also financial flexibility. In this
context, Moody's takes note of the potential fragility of
FSA's access to business opportunities and capital should its insured
portfolio unexpectedly deteriorate.
According to Moody's, FSA is one of only three guarantors
that have remained active in recent months, reflecting the market's
perception of FSA's lower risk profile relative to many of its peers
given the company's limited exposure to ABS CDOs and strong parental
support. FSA has become the leading municipal underwriter with
currently about a 60% market share of the insured market (approximately
20% to 25% of current origination), although increasing
mortgage-related losses could adversely affect the firm's
franchise going forward.
Following Moody's May 14th press release on FSA, the rating
agency has reassessed FSA's mortgage-related exposures in
light of worse-than-expected performance trends in the second
lien asset class, and meaningful credit deterioration of mortgage
investments held by the firm's Financial Products portfolio.
Based on Moody's revised assessment of the risks in FSA's
direct RMBS portfolio, expected losses on a present value basis
approximated $770 million, while stress-case losses
totaled $1.5 billion, an increase of 78% and
36% respectively from Moody's prior estimates. Most
of this increase is attributable to material deterioration in the firm's
HELOC and closed-end second lien portfolio. Furthermore,
FSA remains modestly exposed to the ABS CDO sector, which did not
generate any loss under Moody's stress scenario.
Moody's said that FSA's conservative underwriting strategy has resulted
in a generally high-quality and well-diversified insured
portfolio beyond the firm's mortgage-related exposures.
Most non-mortgage-related structured segments are performing
well, although certain exposures, such as FSA's $75
billion of pooled corporate exposures, may be more sensitive to
transaction or sector deterioration. The rating agency added that
FSA has a $150 million exposure to Jefferson County Alabama that
could lead to losses to the guarantor given the severity of the stress
faced by the issuer.
FSA's asset management business has also experienced credit deterioration
given the large concentration of RMBS risk held within its $18
billion Financial Products portfolio. The rating agency said that
base-case losses within the Financial Products portfolio are expected
to be modest, but Moody's stress-case loss estimates
exceed $600 million, representing a capital charge increase
of roughly $200 million from prior assessments. FSA recently
entered into a $5 billion 5-year bank line with its parent
to mitigate the impact of asset liability mismatches relating to current
mark-to-market losses within the GIC portfolio. Moody's
said that without this line, capital charges for the Financial Products
business would have been materially higher.
Moody's has re-estimated expected and stress loss projections
on FSA's aggregate insured portfolio. Based on Moody's
revised assessment, estimated stress-case losses would approximate
$5.1 billion at the Aaa threshold and $4.2
billion at the Aa2 threshold. This compares to Moody's estimate
of FSA's total claims paying resources of approximately $6.5
billion. Relative to Moody's 1.3x "target"
level for capital adequacy, FSA is currently estimated to be $140
million below the Aaa target level.
SCOPE OF THE REVIEW
Moody's said that it will review the characteristics of FSA's
portfolio, particularly within the structured segment, that
could make the company susceptible to material losses as seen in the mortgage
market. Moody's will also evaluate the company's business
and franchise sensitivity to an erosion of market confidence, including
any impact on financial flexibility. In addition, Moody's
review will consider the likely strategic direction of the firm given
the changing dynamics within the industry, as well as the potential
implications of any future regulatory changes to the credit profile of
Moody's said that it will also consider the potential actions that
FSA may undertake to strengthen its financial profile given the currently
estimated shortfall to Moody's Aaa target level for capital adequacy
and remaining uncertainty about the performance of mortgage related exposures.
In this context, an important consideration will be the nature of
the prospective support for FSA by Dexia.
The following ratings have been placed under review for downgrade:
Financial Security Assurance Inc. -- insurance financial
strength at Aaa;
Financial Security Assurance (U.K.) Limited --
insurance financial strength at Aaa;
Financial Security Assurance Intl Ltd. -- insurance
financial strength at Aaa;
Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. -- senior
unsecured debt at Aa2, junior subordinated debt at Aa3, provisional
senior debt at (P)Aa2, provisional subordinated debt at (P)Aa3,
and provisional preferred stock at (P)A1;
FSA Seguros Mexico S.A. de C.V. --
insurance financial strength at Aaa (the firm's Aaa.mx national
scale rating was affirmed with a stable outlook); and
Sutton Capital Trusts I, II, III and IV -- contingent
capital securities at Aa2.
Financial Security Assurance, Inc. is the main operating
company of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and the parent
of other wholly-owned financial guaranty insurers in a stacked
structure. FSA Holdings is a subsidiary of Dexia Credit Local (senior
debt at Aa1, BFSR at B+), which is the largest operating
company within the Dexia Banking Group.
Senior Vice President
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service
No Related Data.
© 2019 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.