Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Rating Action:

Moody's reviews seven Mongolian banks for downgrade following sovereign review

Global Credit Research - 16 Feb 2017

Hong Kong, February 16, 2017 -- Moody's Investors Service has placed on review for downgrade the long-term ratings of seven Mongolian banks following Moody's review for downgrade of Mongolia's sovereign ratings on 15 February 2017.

The seven banks are: Bogd Bank LLC; Capital Bank LLC; Golomt Bank LLC; Khan Bank LLC; State Bank LLC; Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia LLC; and XacBank LLC.

Please see the related press release for more information on the sovereign review at this link:

https://www.moodys.com/research/--PR_362057

Moody's expects to complete the review within three months.

A full list of the affected ratings can be found at the bottom of this press release.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The action on the seven banks' ratings reflects the high correlation between the creditworthiness of the Mongolian banking system and that of the sovereign, given (1) the strong extent to which the banks' businesses depend on macroeconomic and financial conditions in Mongolia, and in view of the low level of cross-border diversification in their operations; and (2) their significant direct and indirect exposures to domestic sovereign debt relative to their capital bases.

The sovereign review is initiated because of uncertainty around the financing options for Development Bank of Mongolia's (DBM) $580 million repayment which is maturing on 21 March 2017. DBM lacks the foreign currency funds to finance the repayment itself, and the presence of an irrevocable and unconditional government guarantee on the DBM issuance means that Moody's would consider a default on the notes to constitute a default by the sovereign. The DBM notes also contain cross-acceleration clauses on other government obligations, implying wider implications of a default for investors.

The purpose of the sovereign review is to assess the implications of the 21 March 2017 maturity of the government-guaranteed notes issued by the DBM for the government's fiscal position and foreign exchange buffers. In Moody's view, the as yet unresolved issue of how that maturity will be financed poses a near-term threat to Mongolia's credit profile, notwithstanding ongoing discussions with the IMF.

Should an agreement with the IMF be reached during the review, the review will also assess the extent to which the terms of the resultant program mitigate those near-term risks, as well as offer the prospect of improvements in Mongolia's credit profile over the medium term.

In particular, the review for Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia LLC (TDBM) will focus on the implications -- if any -- for holders of the TDBM government-guaranteed bond of $500 million due on 19 May 2020, in the event that the upcoming repayment in March for a similarly guaranteed government bond issued by DBM results in economic losses for bond holders, and the government guarantee is not honored.

What Could Stabilize the Rating at the Current Level: Bogd Bank LLC; Capital Bank LLC; Golomt Bank LLC; Khan Bank LLC; State Bank LLC; and XacBank LLC.

Because these banks' caa1 BCAs are at the same level as Mongolia's sovereign rating, an upgrade is unlikely in the near term.

At the end of the review period, Moody's will confirm their Caa1 ratings with stable outlooks if the sovereign rating of Caa1 is confirmed with a stable outlook; and if the banks' asset quality and profitability profiles, which are under pressure from the challenging operating environment, show signs of clear stabilization.

What Could Change the Rating - Down: Bogd Bank LLC; Capital Bank LLC; Golomt Bank LLC; Khan Bank LLC; State Bank LLC; and XacBank LLC

Factors that could result in a downgrade include:

1) A downgrade of Mongolia's sovereign rating; or

2) A downgrade of the banks' BCAs

The banks' BCAs could be downgraded if: (1) asset quality deteriorates significantly, for example, with problem loans/gross loans exceeding 9.0% for a sustained period; (2) tangible common equity falls below 8%; or (3) profitability deteriorates significantly, leading to annual net losses on a sustained basis.

What Could Stabilize the Rating at the Current Level: Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia LLC.

Because the bank's caa1 BCA is at the same level as Mongolia's sovereign rating, an upgrade is unlikely in the near term.

At the end of the review period, Moody's will maintain its Caa1 rating with a stable outlook if the upcoming repayment in March for a similarly guaranteed government bond issued by DBM does not increase the risk of economic loss for the government-guaranteed bond holders of TDBM, and if there is no reduction in the likelihood that the government guarantee will be exercised if necessary; and if the banks' asset quality and profitability profiles, which are under pressure from the challenging operating environment, show signs of clear stabilization.

What Could Change the Rating - Down: Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia LLC

1) A high likelihood of losses for holders of TDBM government guaranteed bonds if the upcoming repayment in March for a similarly guaranteed government bond issued by DBM increases the risk of economic losses for bond holders of TDBM and reduces the likelihood that the government guarantee will be exercised;

2) A downgrade of Mongolia's sovereign rating; or

3) A downgrade of the bank's BCA

The bank's BCA could be downgraded if: (1) asset quality deteriorates significantly, for example, with problem loans/gross loans exceeding 9.0% for a sustained period; (2) tangible common equity falls below 8%; or (3) profitability deteriorates significantly, leading to annual net losses on a sustained basis.

The resultant ratings and actions are listed below:

Issuer: Bogd Bank LLC

- Baseline Credit Assessment (BCA) of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- Local Currency (LC) Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Foreign Currency (FC) Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Deposit Rating, affirmed at NP

Issuer: Capital Bank LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Deposit Rating, affirmed at NP

Issuer: Golomt Bank LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

Issuer: Khan Bank LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Issuer Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Deposit Rating, affirmed at NP

Issuer: State Bank LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

Issuer: Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Deposit Rating, affirmed at NP

- LC/FC Issuer Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Issuer Rating, affirmed at NP

- Backed FC Senior Unsecured of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Senior Unsecured MTN of (P)Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

Issuer: XacBank LLC

- BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Adjusted BCA of caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- Long-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of B3(cr) placed on review for downgrade

- Short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment affirmed at NP(cr)

- LC Deposit Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC Deposit Rating of Caa2 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Issuer Rating of Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- FC senior unsecured MTN of (P)Caa1 placed on review for downgrade

- LC/FC Short-term Deposit Rating, affirmed at NP

- LC/FC Short-term Issuer Rating, affirmed at NP

- Other Short-term Program, affirmed at (P)NP

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Banks published in January 2016. Please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

The first name below is the lead rating analyst for this Credit Rating and the last name below is the person primarily responsible for approving this Credit Rating.

Hyun Hee Park
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd.
24/F One Pacific Place
88 Queensway
Hong Kong
China (Hong Kong S.A.R.)
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077

Graeme Knowd
MD - Banking
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: 813-5408-4110
SUBSCRIBERS: 813-5408-4100

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd.
24/F One Pacific Place
88 Queensway
Hong Kong
China (Hong Kong S.A.R.)
JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350
SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077

No Related Data.
© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.