Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
characters you see
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
Don't want to see this again?
Accept our to continue to Moodys.com:
AND SCROLL DOWN!
By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document],
you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be
the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and
that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all
Moody’s information that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the
“Information”). References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s
Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Terms of One-Time Website Use
you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary,
you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or
public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish
or distribute any portion of it in any form.
acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of
the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and
(ii) are not statements of current
or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular
securities. Moody’s credit ratings and
publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless
and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and
publications when making an investment decision. No
warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness,
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit
rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.
3. To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors,
officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim
liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses
or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the
Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person
or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud
or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of
Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,
licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the
4. You agree to read [and
be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the
limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.
5. You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of
the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise,
shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in
the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.
08 Sep 2010
Outlook on ICS Building Society changed to negative
London, 08 September 2010 -- Moody's Investors Service today upgraded the bank financial strength rating
(BFSR) of Bank of Ireland to D+ from D. The D+ maps to
Baa3 on the long-term scale and the D mapped to Ba2. The
outlook on the BFSR is stable. The other ratings of the bank,
including the A1 (stable) / Prime-1 bank deposit and senior debt
ratings, are affirmed.
The BFSR of ICS Building Society was also upgraded to D+ (mapping
to Baa3 on the long-term scale) from D/Ba2, in line with
that of its parent. The outlook on the A2 long-term bank
deposit rating of the society was changed to negative.
These changes conclude the review on the two institution's BFSR's
initiated on March 31, 2010.
RATIONALE FOR UPGRADE OF THE BFSR OF BANK OF IRELAND
Ross Abercromby, Vice President and Senior Analyst for Bank of Ireland
at Moody's, commented: "Throughout this year there
has been a substantial improvement in the creditworthiness of Bank of
Ireland as a result of a number of factors. These include the raising
of EUR2.94 billion of equity capital, the transfer of two
tranches of loans to the National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) at an
average discount of 35% - which has been the lowest among
the rated Irish banks -, and the approval by the European
Commission of the bank's restructuring plan".
He continued: "We assume that the the remaining assets that
are to be acquired by NAMA will have a similar discount to those already
transferred. This -- together with the impairment of the remaining
assets -- is sufficiently covered in our base scenario by the successful
capital increase. Some vulnerability remains to our stress scenario,
which is reflected in the D+ BFSR." With regards to
the assets that are not transferred to NAMA, Moody's also
noted that early indications suggest the impairment charge on these may
have peaked (EUR893 million in the first half of 2010, compared
to EUR1.417 billion in the second half of 2009). However
Moody's still considers that the profitability of Bank of Ireland will
remain pressured from elevated impairments over 2010 -- 2012 on the
non-NAMA assets. The pressure is likely to come from the
large residential mortgage book in Ireland as unemployment remains high,
and from the business banking sector in Ireland that is likely to remain
challenged as a result of the substantial fall in economic activity.
Beyond the removal of toxic real estate exposure, the NAMA process
is improving the credit profile of the bank in two further ways:
(i) it is helping to reduce single-name concentrations (that were
already lower than Irish peers), and (ii) it helps to improve the
liquidity profile as the removal of the loans reduces the bank's funding,
and the transferred loans are acquired by NAMA with Irish government guaranteed
bonds that are pledgeable at the ECB.
Furthermore, the rating agency said that the recent capital raising
of the bank has greatly improved the quality of the capital base.
The capital was raised through a variety of means including a placement
to new international investors, a debt to equity swap (on certain
tier 1 and upper tier 2 securities), conversion of an element of
the government's preference shares and a fully underwritten rights
issue. Net of costs and the buying-out of warrants that
were attached to the government preference shares the bank raised EUR2.94
billion of equity, which went beyond the required EUR 2.66
billion required by the Irish regulator. Following this process
the Irish government now owns 36% of the bank and at end-June
2010 the core Tier 1 ratio was 10.2%, up from 8.9%
In addition to the ongoing burden stemming from the impairment of the
non-NAMA assets, the D+ BFSR also incorporates other
challenges facing the bank such as (i) the wind-down of the large
portfolio of non-core assets of which the largest part is the UK
intermediary distributed mortgage book (EUR30 billion at end-June
2010) and, along with that, a reduction in the bank's relatively
high utilisation of wholesale funding; (ii) the sale of businesses
due to European Commission requirements in return for approval of the
state aid; and (iii) the risk of a further downturn in the economies
of Ireland and the UK.
RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK ON THE BFSR OF BANK OF IRELAND
"Moody's is of the opinion that the measures taken by Bank
of Ireland to restructure the bank and to reduce the risk profile,
mean that its standalone credit strength is well captured at the D+
standalone rating level with limited downside risks and this supports
the stable outlook", said Abercromby. "At the
same time, we do not expect further upward pressure on the rating
until the bank has been able to progress significantly in its restructuring
process, including the completion of the NAMA process; and
until it has established a track record of unguaranteed debt issuance
as we note that in the current market environment access to capital markets
remains difficult for any Irish bank. Further evidence that impairment
charges on the non-NAMA assets are falling would also be important
as an indicator" Abercromby added.
NO IMPACT ON DEPOSIT AND SENIOR DEBT RATINGS
Importantly for the bank deposit and senior debt ratings of Bank of Ireland
the Irish government continues to be extremely supportive and this is
the key factor in the high levels of uplift incorporated into the A1 senior
rating of the bank. Given that the Irish government now owns 36%
of the bank and that Bank of Ireland's strong Irish franchise has been
relatively unaffected we expect government support to remain very high.
Moody's noted that coupon payments on the banks tier 1 and junior
subordinated securities are expected to be resumed in 2011. If
this were to happen then this could lead to upward pressure on these ratings;
currently the bank's junior subordinated debt is rated Ba3,
the cumulative preference shares B1 and the non-cumulative preference
ICS BUILDING SOCIETY RATING ACTIONS
The BFSR of ICS Building Society has also been upgraded to D+ (BCA:
Baa3) reflecting how highly integrated it is into Bank of Ireland (its
funding requirements [over and above its deposit base], liquidity
management and market risk management are all centralised in BoI),
and indeed it is managed as a part of the retail operations of Bank of
Ireland. However ICS Building Society needs to be sold following
the negotiations with the European Commission. The bank has a multi-year
period in which to sell ICS, but this will require a substantial
restructuring because as well as providing a servicing capability to its
parent for the Irish mortgage book, Bank of Ireland is only required
to sell a minimum of EUR2 billion of loans as well as deposits that at
end-2009 totalled EUR4.4 billion. The change in outlook
to negative reflects that, in Moody's opinion, any sale
is likely to be to a lower rated domestic entity given the small scale
of ICS Building Society.
RATING METHODOLOGIES APPLIED
The principal methodologies used in rating these issuers are Moody's "Bank
Financial Strength Ratings: Global Methodology", published
in February 2007, "Incorporation of Joint-Default Analysis
into Moody's Bank Ratings: A Refined Methodology", published
in March 2007, and "Moody's Guidelines for Rating Bank Hybrid Securities
and Subordinated Debt", published in November 2009, which
are available on www.moodys.com in the Rating Methodologies
sub-directory under the Research & Ratings tab. Other
methodologies and factors that may have been considered in the process
of rating these issuers can also be found in the Rating Methodologies
sub-directory on Moody's website.
PREVIOUS RATING ACTIONS
The last rating actions on Bank of Ireland and on ICS Building Society
were on March 31, 2010, when the D bank financial strength
rating of both institutions were placed on review for possible upgrade.
In addition on July 21, 2010, the government guaranteed long-term
debt of Bank of Ireland was downgraded to Aa2 (stable outlook) from Aa1
Bank of Ireland is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland and at end-June
2010 reported total assets of EUR180.4 billion. ICS Building
Society is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland and at end-2009
reported total assets of EUR13.6 billion.
MD - Banking
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
Moody's upgrades Bank of Ireland BFSR to D+, outlook stable
One Canada Square
London E14 5FA
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.