Please Note
We brought you to this page based on your search query. If this isn't what you are looking for, you can continue to Search Results for ""
The maximum number of items you can export is 3,000. Please reduce your list by using the filtering tool to the left.
Close
Close
Email Research
Recipient email addresses will not be used in mailing lists or redistributed.
Recipient's
Email

Use semicolon to separate each address, limit to 20 addresses.
Enter the
characters you see
Close
Email Research
Thank you for your interest in sharing Moody's Research. You have reached the daily limit of Research email sharings.
Close
Thank you!
You have successfully sent the research.
Please note: some research requires a paid subscription in order to access.
Already a customer?
LOG IN
Don't want to see this again?
REGISTER
OR
Accept our Terms of Use to continue to Moodys.com:

PLEASE READ AND SCROLL DOWN!

By clicking “I AGREE” [at the end of this document], you indicate that you understand and intend these terms and conditions to be the legal equivalent of a signed, written contract and equally binding, and that you accept such terms and conditions as a condition of viewing any and all Moody’s inform​ation that becomes accessible to you [after clicking “I AGREE”] (the “Information”).   References herein to “Moody’s” include Moody’s Corporation, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Terms of One-Time Website Use

1.            Unless you have entered into an express written contract with Moody’s to the contrary, you agree that you have no right to use the Information in a commercial or public setting and no right to copy it, save it, print it, sell it, or publish or distribute any portion of it in any form.               

2.            You acknowledge and agree that Moody’s credit ratings: (i) are current opinions of the future relative creditworthiness of securities and address no other risk; and (ii) are not statements of current or historical fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell particular securities.  Moody’s credit ratings and publications are not intended for retail investors, and it would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use Moody’s credit ratings and publications when making an investment decision.  No warranty, express or implied, as the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any Moody’s credit rating is given or made by Moody’s in any form whatsoever.          

3.            To the extent permitted by law, Moody’s and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for: (i) any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with use of the Information; and (ii) any direct or compensatory damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud or any other type of liability that by law cannot be excluded) on the part of Moody’s or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with use of the Information.

4.            You agree to read [and be bound by] the more detailed disclosures regarding Moody’s ratings and the limitations of Moody’s liability included in the Information.     

5.            You agree that any disputes relating to this agreement or your use of the Information, whether sounding in contract, tort, statute or otherwise, shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in the City and County of New York, Borough of Manhattan.​​​

I AGREE
Rating Action:

Moody's upgrades Cyprus's government bond rating to B3 and assigns stable outlook

14 Nov 2014

London, 14 November 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service has today upgraded Cyprus's government bond rating to B3 from Caa3. The rating agency has also changed the outlook on the government bond rating to stable from positive and affirmed Cyprus's Not-Prime (NP) short-term rating.

The upgrade reflects the government's progress to date in addressing the country's key challenges with respect to macroeconomic stability, fiscal consolidation and banking sector stability.

The upgrade reflects two key drivers:

1) The consolidation of the government's fiscal position, as illustrated by an expected return to a primary budget surplus from 2014, and the expectation that public debt relative to GDP will level off in 2015.

2) The stabilisation of Cyprus's financial sector through the recapitalisation of troubled banks, which, to some extent, lowers the risk that bank-related contingent liabilities will crystallise on the government's balance sheet.

However, Cyprus's government bond rating remains constrained by substantial credit challenges, including a weak economic outlook and the very high and still rising non-performing loans (NPLs) in the banking sector, which generate further negative risks to the government's balance sheet.

Concurrently, Moody's has today raised the bond ceilings to B1/NP from Caa1/NP, and the deposit ceiling to Caa1/NP from Caa2/NP. In both cases the rise is in line with the change in the government bond rating.

RATINGS RATIONALE

RATING RATIONALE FOR UPGRADE TO B3

The first driver supporting the rating upgrade is the consolidation of the government's fiscal position and the implications for the stabilisation of Cyprus's debt trajectory. Cyprus's fiscal metrics have exceeded the targets set with the Troika (EU, IMF and ECB): In 2013, the primary deficit fell to 2.0% of GDP versus its target of 4.2% in the original programme (under European System of Accounts 95, 'ESA 95'). Most of the measures aimed at permanently reducing the deficit were included in the 2013 budget, and resulted in significant fiscal consolidation of 7.5% percentage points of GDP over 2013-14, according to IMF data.

The fact that the economic contraction in 2013 and 2014 was not as severe as initially expected under the programme also contributed to the government's ability to outperform fiscal targets. In Moody's view, the economic and fiscal outperformance increases the likelihood of the government achieving the rest of its medium-term fiscal consolidation targets, e.g. reaching a primary surplus of 4% of GDP in 2018, and thereby succeeding in its objective of putting debt on a more sustainable path.

Moody's also estimates that the Cypriot government's fiscal deficit will likely come down to around 3% of GDP in 2014, from 4.9% in 2013 and 5.8% in 2012, and that the primary balance will improve by 2 percentage points in 2014, generating about 0.1% of GDP in surplus (under the newly implemented 'ESA 2010' accounting framework). This estimate assumes a contraction of the economy in 2014 by 2.5% in real terms and tight budget execution through 2014 on both expenditures and revenues. It also takes into account the impact of the fiscal measures enacted in 2013, including an increase in the corporate tax rate to 12.5% from 10% and the near-doubling of the withholding tax on interest to 30%, as well as the rationalisation of expenditures.

Comparing the budgeted revenue with the collected one, the government's budget forecasting has proven prudent, says Moody's. For instance, in the government's budget for 2015, revenue (net of borrowing) for 2014 has been revised up by 5.6% compared with budgeted levels, with direct and indirect taxes having been revised up by 2.6%.

Under the rating agency's baseline scenario, assuming a modest and gradual economic recovery from 2015-16 with growth progressively rising to around 2% over the medium term, government debt is expected to peak at around 110% of GDP (under ESA 2010) in 2015, before slowly reversing. Under such scenario, we assume that the €1 billion loan-to-assets swap that the Ministry of Finance intends to complete with the Central Bank will proceed.

The second driver for the upgrade of Cyprus's government rating is the improvement in the stability of the country's financial sector, and in particular the strengthening of the largest banks. Banks' balance sheets have been bolstered through increased capital buffers, external deleveraging (through sales of non-core activities overseas) and improvements in their funding profiles, says Moody's. As a consequence, the sovereign's susceptibility to shocks emanating from the banking sector has decreased to some extent.

The rating agency also notes that the authorities have strengthened the regulatory and supervisory framework, in particular by implementing measures intended to aid banks in dealing with their high NPLs, for instance through the reform of loan foreclosure procedures as set out in a law enacted on 6 September and that was recently enforced by the Supreme Court of Cyprus as it ruled out amendments aimed at diminishing this law.

Moody's notes that while the ECB's Comprehensive Assessment (CA) identified capital shortfalls for Bank of Cyprus Public Company Ltd (BoC), (Ca, review for upgrade/NP/E/ca) and Hellenic Bank Public Company Ltd (Caa3,stable/NP/ E/caa3), based on their financial position as of end of year 2013, BoC has already addressed the capital shortfall through pre-emptive actions this year and Hellenic Bank is in the process of doing so.

The Cooperative Central Bank (CCB, unrated), which is the central body that credit cooperative institutions are affiliated to, is now 99%-owned by the government following its recapitalisation in March 2014, and also passed the CA as the bank took pre-emptive actions. In Moody's view, CCB also shows gradual progress under its restructuring plan. The bank's 96 institutions have been merged into 18, its supervision by the Central Bank of Cyprus has been strengthened, and it had taken measures aimed at improving profitability.

However, there remain a number of risks which balance the credit-positive developments with respect to fiscal consolidation and the stabilisation of the banking system.

First, the continued deleveraging by the heavily indebted household and corporate sectors pose significant risks to the economic outlook. Moody's does not forecast a substantial economic recovery before 2016, and if underlying pressures were to increase by more than expected, the recovery would be postponed, raising further uncertainty over debt sustainability. Even in its base case, Moody's expects government debt to peak at an elevated level of around 110% of GDP in 2015 before leveling off, however slower growth would therefore cause the debt level to peak higher and decline more slowly. In addition, the rating agency notes that if the €1 billion (equivalent to around 6% of GDP) loan-to-assets swap that the Ministry of Finance intends to complete with the Central Bank were to not materialise, this year or in 2015, government debt would peak at around 115% of GDP.

Second, authorities also still face uncertainty over the strength of the banking sector, given the extremely high (48%) and rising level of NPLs across both household and corporate loan books. Provisions against bad loans are low, and banks remain vulnerable to NPLs rising further despite strengthened capital levels. As a result, the balance sheet of the government remains highly susceptible to risks emanating from the banking sector.

Overall, Moody's believes that Cyprus remains in a similar position to other defaulted sovereigns. The underlying problems that led to the country's initial default are not yet fully resolved and the likelihood of redefault will remain elevated for a sustained period of time.

RATIONALE FOR STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects a balance of risks. On the one hand, Moody's expects that the government's commitment to continuing its fiscal consolidation efforts will remain high, and that progress achieved in consolidating public finances and restoring the banking sector will most likely not reverse. On the other hand, the weak economic outlook and the high NPLs in the banking sector continue to pose risks to debt sustainability.

WHAT COULD CHANGE THE RATING UP/DOWN

Upward pressure to Cyprus's government bond rating could result from further fiscal progress under the Troika programme, e.g. if the government's primary surplus were to exceed targets and reach 4% earlier than planned (i.e. before 2018). In addition, evidence that the risks to growth and to the banking sector are unlikely to crystallise would imply upward pressure: higher economic growth and/or a more rapid reversal in the upward trend for banks' NPLs would be credit positive.

Conversely, downward pressure on Cyprus's government bond rating could emerge if the government's commitment to meeting the Troika programme's conditionality and restoring macro-financial stability were to weaken, in particular if the expected low resumption of growth fails to materialise. Evidence of a need to further recapitalise the banking sector would also exert downward pressure on the rating.

RATIONALE FOR RAISING OF LOCAL- AND FOREIGN-CURRENCY BOND CEILINGS

Moody's has raised the local- and foreign-currency bond ceilings of Cyprus to B1/NP from Caa1/NP. It also raised the local- and foreign-currency deposit ceilings to Caa1/NP from Caa2/NP.

The rise in the ceilings reflects the ongoing relaxation of capital control measures and the possibility for depositors to use their deposits for debt repayment under certain conditions. Domestic capital controls have been fully lifted while restrictions on international capital movements remain conditional to size, the nature of transactions, and business purposes. While the plan is for these restrictions to be relaxed, this process will be gradual and will take time to be fully implemented.

GDP per capita (PPP basis, US$): 28,748 (2013 Actual) (also known as Per Capita Income)

Real GDP growth (% change): -5.4% (2013 Actual) (also known as GDP Growth)

Inflation Rate (CPI, % change Dec/Dec): -2.3% (2013 Actual)

Gen. Gov. Financial Balance/GDP: -4.9% (2013 Actual) (also known as Fiscal Balance)

Current Account Balance/GDP: -1.7% (2013 Actual) (also known as External Balance)

External debt/GDP: [not available]

Level of economic development: Medium level of economic resilience

Default history: At least one default event (on bonds and/or loans) has been recorded since 1983.

On 11 November 2014, a rating committee was called to discuss the rating of the Cyprus, Government of. The main points raised during the discussion were: The issuer's fiscal or financial strength, including its debt profile, which has improved. The issuer has also become, to a certain extent, less susceptible to event risks, in particular stemming from the banking sector. Other views raised included: The issuer's institutional strength/ framework and the issuer's governance.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September 2013. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

The weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this rating action, if applicable.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.

Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Lucie Villa
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Sovereign Risk Group
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Alastair Wilson
MD - Sovereign Risk
Sovereign Risk Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454

Moody's upgrades Cyprus's government bond rating to B3 and assigns stable outlook
No Related Data.
© 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.