New York, November 02, 2016 -- Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the rating on notes issued by Lakeside
CDO II, Ltd:
U.S. $1,170,000,000 Class A-1
First Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Delayed Draw Notes Due 2040
(current outstanding balance of $ 39,626,424.11),
Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on July 16, 2015 Upgraded
to Baa3 (sf);
Lakeside CDO II, Ltd, issued in March 2004, is a collateralized
debt obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of RMBS, TruPS and
SF CDOs, originated in 2002 -- 2004.
RATINGS RATIONALE
This rating action is due primarily to the deleveraging of the senior
notes and an increase in the transaction's Class A-1 overcollateralization
(OC) ratio since November 2015. The Class A-1 notes have
been paid down by approximately 41.0%, or $27.5
million since that time. Based on Moody's calculation,
the Class A-1 OC ratio is currently 488%, versus 316%
in November 2015. Interest payments on the Class A-1 and
Class A-2 notes and principal paydown of the Class A-1 notes
is partially the result of interest and principal proceeds from certain
assets treated as defaulted by the trustee in amounts materially exceeding
expectation.
The deal has also benefited from an improvement in the credit quality
of the underlying portfolio since November 2015. Based on Moody's
calculation, the weighted average rating factor is currently 1724,
compared to 1942 in November 2015.
Notwithstanding the benefits of deleveraging and improvement in credit
quality of the portfolio, there is interest shortfall. Interest
payments on the Class A-1 and Class A-2 notes are partially
supplemented with principal proceeds in the waterfall. A total
of $2.8 million of principal proceeds have been diverted
to pay the Class A-1 and Class A-2 interest since November
2015.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action
The methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to Rating SF
CDOs," published in October 2016. Please see the Rating Methodology
page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Factors That Would Lead To an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Rating:
This transaction is subject to a number of factors and circumstances that
could lead to either an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings, as
described below:
1) Macroeconomic uncertainty: Primary causes of uncertainty about
assumptions are the extent of any deterioration in either consumer or
commercial credit conditions and in the residential real estate property
markets. The residential real estate property market's uncertainties
include housing prices; the pace of residential mortgage foreclosures,
loan modifications and refinancing; the unemployment rate; and
interest rates.
2) Deleveraging: One source of uncertainty in this transaction is
whether deleveraging from principal proceeds, recoveries from defaulted
assets, and excess interest proceeds will continue and at what pace.
Faster than expected deleveraging could have a significantly positive
impact on the notes' ratings.
3) Recovery of defaulted assets: The amount of recoveries received
from defaulted assets reported by the trustee and those that Moody's
assumes as having defaulted as well as the timing of these recoveries
create additional uncertainty. Moody's analyzed defaulted
assets assuming limited recoveries, and therefore, realization
of any recoveries exceeding Moody's expectation in the future would
positively impact the notes' ratings.
Loss and Cash Flow Analysis
Moody's applies a Monte Carlo simulation framework in Moody's
CDOROM™ to model the loss distribution for SF CDOs. The simulated
defaults and recoveries for each of the Monte Carlo scenarios define the
reference pool's loss distribution. Moody's then uses
the loss distribution as an input in the CDOEdge™ cash flow model.
In addition to the base case analysis, Moody's also conducted sensitivity
analyses to test the impact of a number of default probabilities on the
rated notes. Below is a summary of the impact of different default
probabilities (expressed in terms of WARF) on all of the rated notes (by
the difference in the number of notches versus the current model output,
for which a positive difference corresponds to lower expected loss):
Ba1 and below ratings notched up by two rating notches (976):
Class A-1: 0
Class A-2: 0
Class B: 0
Class C: 0
Ba1 and below ratings notched down by two notches (Insert WARF level):
Class A-1: -2
Class A-2: 0
Class B: 0
Class C: 0
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and sensitivity
analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity
to Assumptions of the disclosure form.
Moody's describes its loss and cash flow analysis in the section
"Ratings Rationale" of this press release.
Moody's quantitative analysis entails an evaluation of scenarios
that stress factors contributing to sensitivity of ratings and take into
account the likelihood of severe collateral losses or impaired cash flows.
Moody's weights the impact on the rated instruments based on its
assumptions of the likelihood of the events in such scenarios occurring.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to
each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their
credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating.
For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory
disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and
in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to
the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction
structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive
rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further
information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the
respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action,
and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action,
the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit
rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating
review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Svetlana Zaitseva
Associate Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
David Ham
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Structured Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653